[問卦] 練功夫 為何不用練跑步跟重訓?消失
跑步跟重訓,在格鬥裡面是相當重要的基本訓練
不管是拳擊、MMA、摔角、柔術、泰拳...全部都要練
增加肌耐力跟強化肺活量
因為格鬥非常耗體能,而且呼吸相當重要
體能不好的不到一回合就喘不過氣手就抬不起來了
可是在所有的中國功夫電影裡
都沒看到有人在練體能,跑步或重訓
包括少林三十六房、葉問、霍元甲、黃飛鴻...
練習畫面都只有練套路跟招式
難道練中國功夫的都不用練基本體能嗎?
有沒有卦?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.8.199.118
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1493716174.A.55B.html
→
05/02 17:09, , 1F
05/02 17:09, 1F
→
05/02 17:09, , 2F
05/02 17:09, 2F
→
05/02 17:10, , 3F
05/02 17:10, 3F
→
05/02 17:10, , 4F
05/02 17:10, 4F
→
05/02 17:10, , 5F
05/02 17:10, 5F
推
05/02 17:11, , 6F
05/02 17:11, 6F
推
05/02 17:11, , 7F
05/02 17:11, 7F
推
05/02 17:11, , 8F
05/02 17:11, 8F
推
05/02 17:11, , 9F
05/02 17:11, 9F
→
05/02 17:11, , 10F
05/02 17:11, 10F
那他們有在練跑步嗎?跑步最基本的內
沒有肺活量挑水有屁用
→
05/02 17:11, , 11F
05/02 17:11, 11F
→
05/02 17:11, , 12F
05/02 17:11, 12F
→
05/02 17:12, , 13F
05/02 17:12, 13F
→
05/02 17:12, , 14F
05/02 17:12, 14F
噓
05/02 17:12, , 15F
05/02 17:12, 15F
推
05/02 17:12, , 16F
05/02 17:12, 16F
噓
05/02 17:12, , 17F
05/02 17:12, 17F
→
05/02 17:12, , 18F
05/02 17:12, 18F
練套路需要體能 跟你有沒有在練體能是兩回事好嗎
→
05/02 17:13, , 19F
05/02 17:13, 19F
→
05/02 17:14, , 20F
05/02 17:14, 20F
※ 編輯: asianDUB (101.8.199.118), 05/02/2017 17:15:38
推
05/02 17:15, , 21F
05/02 17:15, 21F
推
05/02 17:15, , 22F
05/02 17:15, 22F
→
05/02 17:15, , 23F
05/02 17:15, 23F
→
05/02 17:16, , 24F
05/02 17:16, 24F
→
05/02 17:16, , 25F
05/02 17:16, 25F
→
05/02 17:17, , 26F
05/02 17:17, 26F
→
05/02 17:19, , 27F
05/02 17:19, 27F
推
05/02 17:20, , 28F
05/02 17:20, 28F
推
05/02 17:24, , 29F
05/02 17:24, 29F
噓
05/02 17:25, , 30F
05/02 17:25, 30F
推
05/02 17:26, , 31F
05/02 17:26, 31F
推
05/02 17:26, , 32F
05/02 17:26, 32F
推
05/02 17:26, , 33F
05/02 17:26, 33F
→
05/02 17:26, , 34F
05/02 17:26, 34F
推
05/02 17:26, , 35F
05/02 17:26, 35F
推
05/02 17:26, , 36F
05/02 17:26, 36F
推
05/02 17:26, , 37F
05/02 17:26, 37F
→
05/02 17:27, , 38F
05/02 17:27, 38F
→
05/02 17:27, , 39F
05/02 17:27, 39F
推
05/02 17:31, , 40F
05/02 17:31, 40F
→
05/02 17:32, , 41F
05/02 17:32, 41F
→
05/02 17:33, , 42F
05/02 17:33, 42F
噓
05/02 17:35, , 43F
05/02 17:35, 43F
推
05/02 17:35, , 44F
05/02 17:35, 44F
→
05/02 17:36, , 45F
05/02 17:36, 45F

推
05/02 17:37, , 46F
05/02 17:37, 46F
推
05/02 17:39, , 47F
05/02 17:39, 47F
推
05/02 17:43, , 48F
05/02 17:43, 48F
→
05/02 17:45, , 49F
05/02 17:45, 49F
噓
05/02 17:48, , 50F
05/02 17:48, 50F
噓
05/02 17:50, , 51F
05/02 17:50, 51F
→
05/02 17:50, , 52F
05/02 17:50, 52F
噓
05/02 17:52, , 53F
05/02 17:52, 53F
→
05/02 17:53, , 54F
05/02 17:53, 54F
噓
05/02 18:00, , 55F
05/02 18:00, 55F
推
05/02 18:00, , 56F
05/02 18:00, 56F
→
05/02 18:01, , 57F
05/02 18:01, 57F
推
05/02 18:01, , 58F
05/02 18:01, 58F
→
05/02 18:03, , 59F
05/02 18:03, 59F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):