[新聞] 年改明再審 李來希:軍公教砍最多消失
1.媒體來源:
中央社
2.完整新聞標題:
年改明再審 李來希:軍公教砍最多
3.完整新聞內文:
(中央社記者余曉涵台北2日電)全國公務人員協會理事長李來希今天表示,軍公教勞的
計算基礎應該要一致,在共同基礎上才能改善,但最後結果一定是勞工砍少,軍公教砍最
多。
年金改革鬧得沸沸揚揚,立法院明天也將再度審查年改草案。李來希今天在「軍公教網路
之聲直播電台」中表示,由於幾乎所有勞團都反對勞保年金的計算基礎從5年調升至15年
,因此他認為勞保這塊改革最終並不會過。
李來希說,如果大家都反對勞工的計算基礎調升到15年,那為什麼軍公教的退撫制度的計
算基礎也要調到15年?
李來希表示,現行制度公務員是最後1個月,拉長到15年的傷害比勞工還要大。李來希認
為不管是軍公教勞的計算基礎應該要一致,這樣在共同基礎上慢慢改善,就可以讓問題單
純化。
但李來希認為最後結果一定不是這樣,他說最後結果一定是勞工砍得少,軍公教砍得多,
因為軍公教的人數比較少。
李來希表示,目前政府就營造出95%跟5%的對立,但5%的要輸也要輸得合情合理合法,否
則就會留下動盪根源。
李來希強調,軍公教人員是非常溫和的,如果逼到極端後果將會非常嚴重。
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
http://www.cna.com.tw/news/asoc/201705020084-1.aspx
5.備註:
軍公教平均來講領最多,當然砍最多!
一般勞工哪能像您月退至少領九萬!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.116.73.178
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1493697399.A.A4A.html
噓
05/02 11:57, , 1F
05/02 11:57, 1F
→
05/02 11:57, , 2F
05/02 11:57, 2F
→
05/02 11:57, , 3F
05/02 11:57, 3F
噓
05/02 11:57, , 4F
05/02 11:57, 4F
噓
05/02 11:57, , 5F
05/02 11:57, 5F
推
05/02 11:58, , 6F
05/02 11:58, 6F
噓
05/02 11:58, , 7F
05/02 11:58, 7F
→
05/02 11:58, , 8F
05/02 11:58, 8F
噓
05/02 11:58, , 9F
05/02 11:58, 9F
噓
05/02 11:58, , 10F
05/02 11:58, 10F
噓
05/02 11:58, , 11F
05/02 11:58, 11F
噓
05/02 11:59, , 12F
05/02 11:59, 12F
推
05/02 11:59, , 13F
05/02 11:59, 13F
噓
05/02 11:59, , 14F
05/02 11:59, 14F
推
05/02 11:59, , 15F
05/02 11:59, 15F
→
05/02 11:59, , 16F
05/02 11:59, 16F
噓
05/02 11:59, , 17F
05/02 11:59, 17F
噓
05/02 12:00, , 18F
05/02 12:00, 18F
→
05/02 12:00, , 19F
05/02 12:00, 19F
噓
05/02 12:00, , 20F
05/02 12:00, 20F
噓
05/02 12:01, , 21F
05/02 12:01, 21F
噓
05/02 12:01, , 22F
05/02 12:01, 22F
噓
05/02 12:01, , 23F
05/02 12:01, 23F
推
05/02 12:02, , 24F
05/02 12:02, 24F
噓
05/02 12:02, , 25F
05/02 12:02, 25F
→
05/02 12:02, , 26F
05/02 12:02, 26F
噓
05/02 12:03, , 27F
05/02 12:03, 27F
→
05/02 12:03, , 28F
05/02 12:03, 28F
→
05/02 12:03, , 29F
05/02 12:03, 29F
噓
05/02 12:04, , 30F
05/02 12:04, 30F
噓
05/02 12:05, , 31F
05/02 12:05, 31F
噓
05/02 12:06, , 32F
05/02 12:06, 32F
噓
05/02 12:06, , 33F
05/02 12:06, 33F
噓
05/02 12:07, , 34F
05/02 12:07, 34F
噓
05/02 12:07, , 35F
05/02 12:07, 35F
噓
05/02 12:07, , 36F
05/02 12:07, 36F
噓
05/02 12:10, , 37F
05/02 12:10, 37F
噓
05/02 12:11, , 38F
05/02 12:11, 38F
噓
05/02 12:14, , 39F
05/02 12:14, 39F
噓
05/02 12:16, , 40F
05/02 12:16, 40F
推
05/02 12:20, , 41F
05/02 12:20, 41F
推
05/02 12:20, , 42F
05/02 12:20, 42F
噓
05/02 12:20, , 43F
05/02 12:20, 43F
推
05/02 12:21, , 44F
05/02 12:21, 44F
推
05/02 12:21, , 45F
05/02 12:21, 45F
推
05/02 12:21, , 46F
05/02 12:21, 46F
噓
05/02 12:22, , 47F
05/02 12:22, 47F
噓
05/02 12:25, , 48F
05/02 12:25, 48F
噓
05/02 12:26, , 49F
05/02 12:26, 49F
噓
05/02 12:28, , 50F
05/02 12:28, 50F
→
05/02 12:28, , 51F
05/02 12:28, 51F
噓
05/02 12:29, , 52F
05/02 12:29, 52F
噓
05/02 12:29, , 53F
05/02 12:29, 53F
推
05/02 12:31, , 54F
05/02 12:31, 54F
噓
05/02 12:33, , 55F
05/02 12:33, 55F
推
05/02 12:34, , 56F
05/02 12:34, 56F
噓
05/02 12:40, , 57F
05/02 12:40, 57F
→
05/02 12:41, , 58F
05/02 12:41, 58F
推
05/02 12:44, , 59F
05/02 12:44, 59F
推
05/02 12:45, , 60F
05/02 12:45, 60F
→
05/02 12:46, , 61F
05/02 12:46, 61F
噓
05/02 13:05, , 62F
05/02 13:05, 62F
→
05/02 13:06, , 63F
05/02 13:06, 63F
→
05/02 13:06, , 64F
05/02 13:06, 64F
噓
05/02 13:09, , 65F
05/02 13:09, 65F
噓
05/02 13:42, , 66F
05/02 13:42, 66F
→
05/02 14:00, , 67F
05/02 14:00, 67F
噓
05/02 14:11, , 68F
05/02 14:11, 68F
噓
05/02 14:42, , 69F
05/02 14:42, 69F
噓
05/02 14:50, , 70F
05/02 14:50, 70F
→
05/02 14:56, , 71F
05/02 14:56, 71F
噓
05/02 15:09, , 72F
05/02 15:09, 72F
噓
05/02 16:05, , 73F
05/02 16:05, 73F
推
05/02 17:42, , 74F
05/02 17:42, 74F
推
05/02 18:22, , 75F
05/02 18:22, 75F
推
05/02 18:23, , 76F
05/02 18:23, 76F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):