[問卦] 台男造成的嚴重傷亡車禍比率>>>>台女?消失
雖然台女常常被酸三寶
但造成輕微傷勢的居多
但每次看到那種嚴重肇事致死或重傷的
大多是無照或酒駕台男 不然就是自以為行車技巧好的台男
這樣說起來 其實台男在馬路上比台女還危險的多吧?
是這樣嗎??
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 158.69.25.95
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1491302920.A.8F6.html
→
04/04 18:48, , 1F
04/04 18:48, 1F
噓
04/04 18:49, , 2F
04/04 18:49, 2F
推
04/04 18:50, , 3F
04/04 18:50, 3F
推
04/04 18:50, , 4F
04/04 18:50, 4F
→
04/04 18:50, , 5F
04/04 18:50, 5F
→
04/04 18:50, , 6F
04/04 18:50, 6F
推
04/04 18:50, , 7F
04/04 18:50, 7F
→
04/04 18:50, , 8F
04/04 18:50, 8F
你確定酒駕 或無照的台男 出現在你面前都是用很正常的方式?
→
04/04 18:50, , 9F
04/04 18:50, 9F
噓
04/04 18:50, , 10F
04/04 18:50, 10F
推
04/04 18:51, , 11F
04/04 18:51, 11F
→
04/04 18:51, , 12F
04/04 18:51, 12F
噓
04/04 18:51, , 13F
04/04 18:51, 13F
推
04/04 18:52, , 14F
04/04 18:52, 14F
→
04/04 18:52, , 15F
04/04 18:52, 15F
→
04/04 18:52, , 16F
04/04 18:52, 16F
→
04/04 18:52, , 17F
04/04 18:52, 17F
三寶的花招還可以讓你看到笑出來
台男的花招會讓你這輩子都沒辦法再笑…
→
04/04 18:53, , 18F
04/04 18:53, 18F
推
04/04 18:53, , 19F
04/04 18:53, 19F
→
04/04 18:53, , 20F
04/04 18:53, 20F
推
04/04 18:54, , 21F
04/04 18:54, 21F
推
04/04 18:54, , 22F
04/04 18:54, 22F
真的 男生保費就是比較貴 保險公司很精明的
→
04/04 18:54, , 23F
04/04 18:54, 23F
推
04/04 18:55, , 24F
04/04 18:55, 24F
※ 編輯: Aruka0924 (158.69.25.95), 04/04/2017 18:56:22
→
04/04 18:55, , 25F
04/04 18:55, 25F
→
04/04 18:56, , 26F
04/04 18:56, 26F
推
04/04 18:56, , 27F
04/04 18:56, 27F
→
04/04 18:56, , 28F
04/04 18:56, 28F
我可以理解把女生列在三寶的原因 但台男危險程度真的完全不輸 甚至更高
推
04/04 18:57, , 29F
04/04 18:57, 29F
推
04/04 18:57, , 30F
04/04 18:57, 30F
→
04/04 18:57, , 31F
04/04 18:57, 31F
推
04/04 18:57, , 32F
04/04 18:57, 32F
認真說 會逼車的垃圾 100個裡面有99個是台男 不是開玩笑的
→
04/04 18:57, , 33F
04/04 18:57, 33F
→
04/04 18:58, , 34F
04/04 18:58, 34F
→
04/04 18:58, , 35F
04/04 18:58, 35F
推
04/04 18:59, , 36F
04/04 18:59, 36F
推
04/04 18:59, , 37F
04/04 18:59, 37F
※ 編輯: Aruka0924 (158.69.25.95), 04/04/2017 19:01:09
→
04/04 18:59, , 38F
04/04 18:59, 38F
推
04/04 19:02, , 39F
04/04 19:02, 39F
推
04/04 19:02, , 40F
04/04 19:02, 40F
他跟小傑粗去丸了~
※ 編輯: Aruka0924 (158.69.25.95), 04/04/2017 19:04:01
噓
04/04 19:06, , 41F
04/04 19:06, 41F
→
04/04 19:06, , 42F
04/04 19:06, 42F
→
04/04 19:06, , 43F
04/04 19:06, 43F
噓
04/04 19:09, , 44F
04/04 19:09, 44F
推
04/04 19:10, , 45F
04/04 19:10, 45F
噓
04/04 19:13, , 46F
04/04 19:13, 46F
→
04/04 19:15, , 47F
04/04 19:15, 47F
→
04/04 19:15, , 48F
04/04 19:15, 48F
→
04/04 19:16, , 49F
04/04 19:16, 49F
噓
04/04 19:20, , 50F
04/04 19:20, 50F
→
04/04 19:20, , 51F
04/04 19:20, 51F
噓
04/04 19:25, , 52F
04/04 19:25, 52F
噓
04/04 19:40, , 53F
04/04 19:40, 53F
→
04/04 19:40, , 54F
04/04 19:40, 54F
推
04/04 19:41, , 55F
04/04 19:41, 55F
推
04/04 19:41, , 56F
04/04 19:41, 56F
噓
04/04 19:43, , 57F
04/04 19:43, 57F
→
04/04 19:43, , 58F
04/04 19:43, 58F
→
04/04 19:43, , 59F
04/04 19:43, 59F
推
04/04 19:44, , 60F
04/04 19:44, 60F
推
04/04 19:47, , 61F
04/04 19:47, 61F
噓
04/04 20:53, , 62F
04/04 20:53, 62F
→
04/04 20:53, , 63F
04/04 20:53, 63F
噓
04/04 20:59, , 64F
04/04 20:59, 64F
推
04/05 21:41, , 65F
04/05 21:41, 65F
噓
04/06 10:09, , 66F
04/06 10:09, 66F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):