[新聞] 下班傳Line1則算4小時 工商界:一例一休讓刁勞變多消失
下班傳Line1則算4小時 工商界:一例一休讓刁勞變多
2017-03-11 21:22
〔即時新聞/綜合報導〕新北市一名勞工因常在非上班時間接到雇主傳LINE給他交代工作,
新北市仲裁委員會仲裁因此拿到加班費,勞動部對此提醒,在一例一休上路後,若勞工在休
息日就算只用LINE發了1封工作訊息,雇主就需支付4小時的加班費。針對相關報導,台北市
商業會理事長王應傑則認為,隨著勞基法新制上路,將會有越來越多刁難老闆的「刁勞」。
下班傳LINE算加班 賴正鎰:政府管太多
新北市一名電子零件製造業廠務助理前年遭資方資遣後,蒐集包含LINE對話的相關證據,向
資方請求加班費,勞資調解破裂交付仲裁,最終新北市仲裁委員會認定雇主須補發2598元加
班費。
《蘋果日報》報導,勞動部指出,一例一休實施後,休息日加班未滿4小時須以4小時計薪,
因此雇主在休息日發LINE要求勞工加班的話,就算只有1封、被認定只加班1分鐘,也須以4
小時來計算加班費。勞動部也建議,勞雇雙方可事先約定,在休息日用通訊軟體加班要如何
計算工時。
《中央社》報導,全國商業總會理事長賴正鎰對此表示「政府管太多了」,首例一開可能會
引發寒蟬效應,日後若雇主不用LINE而是尋找其他替代方案,也只是讓雙方都感到困擾。他
也指出,交辦事項應該是緊急或臨時性的,本來就難預知,政府應從寬認定。
王應傑則指出,這項案例反而是造成勞資對立,讓原本的小問題被放大,如果員工都那麼計
較,雇主根本防不勝防。他也強調,員工下班後可選擇關機,主管應該不會指責,要不要加
班全看員工心態。
王應傑也提到,很多勞工在一例一休上路後因加班時數不夠、抱怨薪水變少,且也有越來越
多刁難老闆的「刁勞」出現,這只會讓雙方的衝突擴大。
http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/2001370
--
╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴╴
▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁
▕ 太陽系絕對防衛線 ▏
▕ Gunbuster ▏
 ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.226.143.85
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1489248334.A.700.html
→
03/12 00:06, , 1F
03/12 00:06, 1F
噓
03/12 00:06, , 2F
03/12 00:06, 2F
推
03/12 00:06, , 3F
03/12 00:06, 3F
→
03/12 00:06, , 4F
03/12 00:06, 4F
推
03/12 00:07, , 5F
03/12 00:07, 5F
→
03/12 00:07, , 6F
03/12 00:07, 6F
→
03/12 00:07, , 7F
03/12 00:07, 7F
噓
03/12 00:07, , 8F
03/12 00:07, 8F
→
03/12 00:07, , 9F
03/12 00:07, 9F
噓
03/12 00:07, , 10F
03/12 00:07, 10F
推
03/12 00:08, , 11F
03/12 00:08, 11F
→
03/12 00:08, , 12F
03/12 00:08, 12F
推
03/12 00:10, , 13F
03/12 00:10, 13F
噓
03/12 00:11, , 14F
03/12 00:11, 14F
→
03/12 00:11, , 15F
03/12 00:11, 15F
→
03/12 00:11, , 16F
03/12 00:11, 16F
→
03/12 00:12, , 17F
03/12 00:12, 17F
→
03/12 00:13, , 18F
03/12 00:13, 18F
→
03/12 00:13, , 19F
03/12 00:13, 19F
噓
03/12 00:15, , 20F
03/12 00:15, 20F
噓
03/12 00:16, , 21F
03/12 00:16, 21F
推
03/12 00:16, , 22F
03/12 00:16, 22F
噓
03/12 00:16, , 23F
03/12 00:16, 23F
→
03/12 00:17, , 24F
03/12 00:17, 24F
→
03/12 00:17, , 25F
03/12 00:17, 25F
→
03/12 00:18, , 26F
03/12 00:18, 26F
推
03/12 00:18, , 27F
03/12 00:18, 27F
→
03/12 00:18, , 28F
03/12 00:18, 28F
→
03/12 00:19, , 29F
03/12 00:19, 29F
噓
03/12 00:19, , 30F
03/12 00:19, 30F
推
03/12 00:20, , 31F
03/12 00:20, 31F
→
03/12 00:20, , 32F
03/12 00:20, 32F
噓
03/12 00:21, , 33F
03/12 00:21, 33F
推
03/12 00:24, , 34F
03/12 00:24, 34F
噓
03/12 00:30, , 35F
03/12 00:30, 35F
推
03/12 00:38, , 36F
03/12 00:38, 36F
噓
03/12 00:54, , 37F
03/12 00:54, 37F
噓
03/12 01:06, , 38F
03/12 01:06, 38F
噓
03/12 01:16, , 39F
03/12 01:16, 39F
→
03/12 01:18, , 40F
03/12 01:18, 40F
噓
03/12 06:11, , 41F
03/12 06:11, 41F
噓
03/12 06:24, , 42F
03/12 06:24, 42F
噓
03/12 08:03, , 43F
03/12 08:03, 43F
推
03/12 08:04, , 44F
03/12 08:04, 44F
噓
03/12 08:06, , 45F
03/12 08:06, 45F
推
03/12 08:11, , 46F
03/12 08:11, 46F
噓
03/12 08:29, , 47F
03/12 08:29, 47F
推
03/12 08:59, , 48F
03/12 08:59, 48F
噓
03/12 09:06, , 49F
03/12 09:06, 49F
噓
03/12 09:10, , 50F
03/12 09:10, 50F
噓
03/12 09:34, , 51F
03/12 09:34, 51F
噓
03/12 10:01, , 52F
03/12 10:01, 52F
噓
03/12 11:11, , 53F
03/12 11:11, 53F
→
03/12 11:40, , 54F
03/12 11:40, 54F
→
03/12 11:40, , 55F
03/12 11:40, 55F
推
03/12 22:36, , 56F
03/12 22:36, 56F
噓
03/12 23:44, , 57F
03/12 23:44, 57F
噓
03/13 02:30, , 58F
03/13 02:30, 58F
噓
03/13 02:39, , 59F
03/13 02:39, 59F
→
03/14 18:42, , 60F
03/14 18:42, 60F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 14 篇):