[問卦] 同性戀吵合法,那戀童為什麼該被歧視?消失
同性戀總是說著愛上同性是天生的不是病
那戀童也是天生喜愛孩童
又為什麼沒人幫他們解放要合法?
同性戀說自己被逼著愛上異性很痛苦
那戀童又何嘗不是呢?
如果同性戀想合法平權,那是不是戀童戀動物的也應該合法呢?
跟馬結婚,跟掃把結婚,跟R20結婚,跟孩童結婚,難道愛上這些的人錯了嗎?
他們也是天生愛上這些的啊
我想這些也應該同時合法,不然就是在歧視啊!
理性討論,深入探討。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.75.219.2
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1477739599.A.39F.html
噓
10/29 19:13, , 1F
10/29 19:13, 1F
→
10/29 19:14, , 2F
10/29 19:14, 2F
→
10/29 19:14, , 3F
10/29 19:14, 3F
推
10/29 19:14, , 4F
10/29 19:14, 4F
噓
10/29 19:14, , 5F
10/29 19:14, 5F
→
10/29 19:14, , 6F
10/29 19:14, 6F
噓
10/29 19:14, , 7F
10/29 19:14, 7F
→
10/29 19:14, , 8F
10/29 19:14, 8F
→
10/29 19:14, , 9F
10/29 19:14, 9F
噓
10/29 19:14, , 10F
10/29 19:14, 10F
噓
10/29 19:14, , 11F
10/29 19:14, 11F
→
10/29 19:15, , 12F
10/29 19:15, 12F
→
10/29 19:15, , 13F
10/29 19:15, 13F
噓
10/29 19:15, , 14F
10/29 19:15, 14F
→
10/29 19:15, , 15F
10/29 19:15, 15F
不要物品不會說話就歧視人家哦,哪天科技發達,物品會跳出來指責你歧視哦。
推
10/29 19:15, , 16F
10/29 19:15, 16F
那R20用之前會詢問一下R20他願意嗎?
噓
10/29 19:15, , 17F
10/29 19:15, 17F
→
10/29 19:15, , 18F
10/29 19:15, 18F
噓
10/29 19:15, , 19F
10/29 19:15, 19F
噓
10/29 19:15, , 20F
10/29 19:15, 20F
→
10/29 19:16, , 21F
10/29 19:16, 21F
噓
10/29 19:16, , 22F
10/29 19:16, 22F
→
10/29 19:16, , 23F
10/29 19:16, 23F
推
10/29 19:17, , 24F
10/29 19:17, 24F
→
10/29 19:17, , 25F
10/29 19:17, 25F
噓
10/29 19:17, , 26F
10/29 19:17, 26F
推
10/29 19:17, , 27F
10/29 19:17, 27F
→
10/29 19:17, , 28F
10/29 19:17, 28F
噓
10/29 19:18, , 29F
10/29 19:18, 29F
各位各位不要激動,請用深入淺出的言論理想討論,他們天生愛上自己愛上的對象錯了嗎
?
※ 編輯: windigo (42.75.219.2), 10/29/2016 19:20:25
推
10/29 19:19, , 30F
10/29 19:19, 30F
噓
10/29 19:20, , 31F
10/29 19:20, 31F
推
10/29 19:20, , 32F
10/29 19:20, 32F
噓
10/29 19:20, , 33F
10/29 19:20, 33F
如果我問林志鈴的事你就會問我是不是想X林志鈴?完全無關的事情你這樣聯想?是想吃
妨害名譽嗎?
※ 編輯: windigo (42.75.219.2), 10/29/2016 19:22:21
→
10/29 19:21, , 34F
10/29 19:21, 34F
推
10/29 19:21, , 35F
10/29 19:21, 35F
還有 55 則推文
還有 15 段內文
→
10/29 19:43, , 91F
10/29 19:43, 91F
→
10/29 19:44, , 92F
10/29 19:44, 92F
推
10/29 19:44, , 93F
10/29 19:44, 93F
噓
10/29 19:44, , 94F
10/29 19:44, 94F
→
10/29 19:45, , 95F
10/29 19:45, 95F
噓
10/29 19:47, , 96F
10/29 19:47, 96F
噓
10/29 19:49, , 97F
10/29 19:49, 97F
→
10/29 19:51, , 98F
10/29 19:51, 98F
噓
10/29 19:53, , 99F
10/29 19:53, 99F
噓
10/29 19:53, , 100F
10/29 19:53, 100F
推
10/29 19:56, , 101F
10/29 19:56, 101F
→
10/29 19:57, , 102F
10/29 19:57, 102F
推
10/29 19:57, , 103F
10/29 19:57, 103F
→
10/29 19:58, , 104F
10/29 19:58, 104F
推
10/29 20:00, , 105F
10/29 20:00, 105F
噓
10/29 20:03, , 106F
10/29 20:03, 106F
噓
10/29 20:05, , 107F
10/29 20:05, 107F
推
10/29 20:08, , 108F
10/29 20:08, 108F
噓
10/29 20:11, , 109F
10/29 20:11, 109F
→
10/29 20:11, , 110F
10/29 20:11, 110F
噓
10/29 20:18, , 111F
10/29 20:18, 111F
理性討論喔各位,我提出我的疑問而已,如同我問豬為什麼奶很大也不代表我想摸豬奶好
嗎
※ 編輯: windigo (42.75.219.2), 10/29/2016 20:21:55
噓
10/29 20:22, , 112F
10/29 20:22, 112F
噓
10/29 20:28, , 113F
10/29 20:28, 113F
→
10/29 20:35, , 114F
10/29 20:35, 114F
推
10/29 20:35, , 115F
10/29 20:35, 115F
→
10/29 20:35, , 116F
10/29 20:35, 116F
→
10/29 20:46, , 117F
10/29 20:46, 117F
噓
10/29 20:50, , 118F
10/29 20:50, 118F
噓
10/29 21:07, , 119F
10/29 21:07, 119F
噓
10/29 21:16, , 120F
10/29 21:16, 120F
推
10/29 21:20, , 121F
10/29 21:20, 121F
推
10/29 21:28, , 122F
10/29 21:28, 122F
噓
10/29 21:29, , 123F
10/29 21:29, 123F
推
10/29 21:35, , 124F
10/29 21:35, 124F
→
10/29 21:35, , 125F
10/29 21:35, 125F
噓
10/29 21:46, , 126F
10/29 21:46, 126F
噓
10/29 22:13, , 127F
10/29 22:13, 127F
→
10/29 22:14, , 128F
10/29 22:14, 128F
噓
10/29 23:31, , 129F
10/29 23:31, 129F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):