[問卦] 如果未來同性婚姻可以合法,那一夫多妻是消失
如果未來同性婚姻可以合法,那一夫多妻是否也應恢復合法呢?
贊成同性婚姻的主要觀點是:
1.性取向是天生基因造成的 不應受到排擠或歧視
2.同性結婚不會影響他人 所以將其合法不會造成社會問題
如果同意上述觀點
那麼曾施行幾千年的一夫多妻制 是否也更需恢復合法
因為~
1.男人好色是天生基因造成的 多娶妻妾不應受到排擠或歧視
2.一夫多妻不會影響他人 只要原配同意就好
而且已施行過幾千年 也沒造成甚麼嚴重社會問題
甚至可以解決外遇 私生子女教養 等負面問題
所以如果同性婚姻可以合法
那麼一夫多妻恢復合法 也就更沒理由可以反對了
上述論點 不知大家有何意見呢
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 125.230.21.224
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1477064374.A.B2A.html
→
10/21 23:40, , 1F
10/21 23:40, 1F
→
10/21 23:40, , 2F
10/21 23:40, 2F
→
10/21 23:40, , 3F
10/21 23:40, 3F
→
10/21 23:40, , 4F
10/21 23:40, 4F
→
10/21 23:40, , 5F
10/21 23:40, 5F
→
10/21 23:41, , 6F
10/21 23:41, 6F
→
10/21 23:41, , 7F
10/21 23:41, 7F
推
10/21 23:41, , 8F
10/21 23:41, 8F
→
10/21 23:42, , 9F
10/21 23:42, 9F
→
10/21 23:42, , 10F
10/21 23:42, 10F
→
10/21 23:43, , 11F
10/21 23:43, 11F
→
10/21 23:43, , 12F
10/21 23:43, 12F
→
10/21 23:43, , 13F
10/21 23:43, 13F
→
10/21 23:44, , 14F
10/21 23:44, 14F
推
10/21 23:44, , 15F
10/21 23:44, 15F
推
10/21 23:44, , 16F
10/21 23:44, 16F
推
10/21 23:45, , 17F
10/21 23:45, 17F
推
10/21 23:45, , 18F
10/21 23:45, 18F
→
10/21 23:45, , 19F
10/21 23:45, 19F
→
10/21 23:45, , 20F
10/21 23:45, 20F
→
10/21 23:45, , 21F
10/21 23:45, 21F
→
10/21 23:45, , 22F
10/21 23:45, 22F
→
10/21 23:46, , 23F
10/21 23:46, 23F
噓
10/21 23:46, , 24F
10/21 23:46, 24F
→
10/21 23:46, , 25F
10/21 23:46, 25F
→
10/21 23:46, , 26F
10/21 23:46, 26F
→
10/21 23:46, , 27F
10/21 23:46, 27F
→
10/21 23:46, , 28F
10/21 23:46, 28F
→
10/21 23:47, , 29F
10/21 23:47, 29F
噓
10/21 23:47, , 30F
10/21 23:47, 30F
→
10/21 23:47, , 31F
10/21 23:47, 31F
→
10/21 23:48, , 32F
10/21 23:48, 32F
→
10/21 23:48, , 33F
10/21 23:48, 33F
→
10/21 23:48, , 34F
10/21 23:48, 34F
推
10/21 23:48, , 35F
10/21 23:48, 35F
→
10/21 23:49, , 36F
10/21 23:49, 36F
推
10/21 23:50, , 37F
10/21 23:50, 37F
噓
10/21 23:51, , 38F
10/21 23:51, 38F
推
10/21 23:51, , 39F
10/21 23:51, 39F
還有 39 則推文
噓
10/22 08:13, , 79F
10/22 08:13, 79F
噓
10/22 08:20, , 80F
10/22 08:20, 80F
噓
10/22 08:27, , 81F
10/22 08:27, 81F
→
10/22 08:28, , 82F
10/22 08:28, 82F
推
10/22 08:48, , 83F
10/22 08:48, 83F
→
10/22 08:48, , 84F
10/22 08:48, 84F
噓
10/22 09:10, , 85F
10/22 09:10, 85F
噓
10/22 09:45, , 86F
10/22 09:45, 86F
→
10/22 09:54, , 87F
10/22 09:54, 87F
→
10/22 10:00, , 88F
10/22 10:00, 88F
推
10/22 10:03, , 89F
10/22 10:03, 89F
→
10/22 10:03, , 90F
10/22 10:03, 90F
噓
10/22 10:05, , 91F
10/22 10:05, 91F
→
10/22 10:05, , 92F
10/22 10:05, 92F
推
10/22 11:07, , 93F
10/22 11:07, 93F
噓
10/22 13:23, , 94F
10/22 13:23, 94F
噓
10/22 13:23, , 95F
10/22 13:23, 95F
→
10/22 13:23, , 96F
10/22 13:23, 96F
噓
10/22 18:19, , 97F
10/22 18:19, 97F
噓
10/22 18:58, , 98F
10/22 18:58, 98F
噓
10/22 19:16, , 99F
10/22 19:16, 99F
→
10/22 19:16, , 100F
10/22 19:16, 100F
→
10/22 19:16, , 101F
10/22 19:16, 101F
→
10/22 19:16, , 102F
10/22 19:16, 102F
噓
10/22 19:26, , 103F
10/22 19:26, 103F
噓
10/22 19:57, , 104F
10/22 19:57, 104F
推
10/22 19:58, , 105F
10/22 19:58, 105F
→
10/22 22:24, , 106F
10/22 22:24, 106F
噓
10/22 22:52, , 107F
10/22 22:52, 107F
→
10/22 22:52, , 108F
10/22 22:52, 108F
推
10/22 23:17, , 109F
10/22 23:17, 109F
→
10/23 02:52, , 110F
10/23 02:52, 110F
噓
10/23 09:30, , 111F
10/23 09:30, 111F
噓
10/23 09:33, , 112F
10/23 09:33, 112F
噓
10/23 10:42, , 113F
10/23 10:42, 113F
噓
10/23 10:44, , 114F
10/23 10:44, 114F
→
10/23 10:45, , 115F
10/23 10:45, 115F
噓
10/23 16:56, , 116F
10/23 16:56, 116F
推
10/24 13:34, , 117F
10/24 13:34, 117F
噓
10/24 13:44, , 118F
10/24 13:44, 118F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 16 篇):