[問卦] 日兵百人斬是畜生,而毛澤東殺千萬人是神?消失
如題
為何
日兵在南京斬百人
結果被支那人視為畜生
而
毛澤東、蔣臭頭在支那殺害千萬人
卻被支那人視為神
WHY ?
這不是很矛盾嗎
為了合理詮釋這種矛盾
產生以下幾種推論:
1.日兵殺得不夠多?
要像毛、蔣一樣屠殺超過千萬才會被支那人認證是神
2.因為日兵不是支那國籍
所以屠殺支那人被視為畜生作為
反觀蔣毛是支那國籍
所以支那人基於自家人心態
允許蔣毛屠殺千萬人
那麼
是不是日兵只要改國籍成支那、也殺個千萬
就能像蔣毛一樣被支那人視為神?
結論:只要被納入成為支那人
就要有被屠殺千萬的覺悟?
但
只要你有能力殺千萬人
也可以被支那人崇拜為神?
不知以上推論有無錯誤?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.237.221.71
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1476001860.A.426.html
→
10/09 16:31, , 1F
10/09 16:31, 1F
推
10/09 16:31, , 2F
10/09 16:31, 2F
→
10/09 16:31, , 3F
10/09 16:31, 3F
※ 編輯: DJaV (36.237.221.71), 10/09/2016 16:32:19
→
10/09 16:31, , 4F
10/09 16:31, 4F
→
10/09 16:31, , 5F
10/09 16:31, 5F
→
10/09 16:31, , 6F
10/09 16:31, 6F
→
10/09 16:31, , 7F
10/09 16:31, 7F
推
10/09 16:32, , 8F
10/09 16:32, 8F
→
10/09 16:32, , 9F
10/09 16:32, 9F
推
10/09 16:32, , 10F
10/09 16:32, 10F
推
10/09 16:32, , 11F
10/09 16:32, 11F
→
10/09 16:33, , 12F
10/09 16:33, 12F
推
10/09 16:33, , 13F
10/09 16:33, 13F
→
10/09 16:33, , 14F
10/09 16:33, 14F
→
10/09 16:33, , 15F
10/09 16:33, 15F
→
10/09 16:33, , 16F
10/09 16:33, 16F
推
10/09 16:33, , 17F
10/09 16:33, 17F
→
10/09 16:34, , 18F
10/09 16:34, 18F
推
10/09 16:34, , 19F
10/09 16:34, 19F
→
10/09 16:34, , 20F
10/09 16:34, 20F
→
10/09 16:34, , 21F
10/09 16:34, 21F
→
10/09 16:34, , 22F
10/09 16:34, 22F
→
10/09 16:34, , 23F
10/09 16:34, 23F
→
10/09 16:35, , 24F
10/09 16:35, 24F
→
10/09 16:35, , 25F
10/09 16:35, 25F
→
10/09 16:35, , 26F
10/09 16:35, 26F
推
10/09 16:36, , 27F
10/09 16:36, 27F
→
10/09 16:36, , 28F
10/09 16:36, 28F
噓
10/09 16:37, , 29F
10/09 16:37, 29F
→
10/09 16:37, , 30F
10/09 16:37, 30F
→
10/09 16:37, , 31F
10/09 16:37, 31F
→
10/09 16:37, , 32F
10/09 16:37, 32F
→
10/09 16:37, , 33F
10/09 16:37, 33F
推
10/09 16:38, , 34F
10/09 16:38, 34F
→
10/09 16:38, , 35F
10/09 16:38, 35F
推
10/09 16:38, , 36F
10/09 16:38, 36F
推
10/09 16:39, , 37F
10/09 16:39, 37F
→
10/09 16:40, , 38F
10/09 16:40, 38F
噓
10/09 16:40, , 39F
10/09 16:40, 39F
→
10/09 16:40, , 40F
10/09 16:40, 40F
→
10/09 16:41, , 41F
10/09 16:41, 41F
→
10/09 16:42, , 42F
10/09 16:42, 42F
→
10/09 16:42, , 43F
10/09 16:42, 43F
→
10/09 16:48, , 44F
10/09 16:48, 44F
→
10/09 16:50, , 45F
10/09 16:50, 45F
推
10/09 16:52, , 46F
10/09 16:52, 46F
→
10/09 16:53, , 47F
10/09 16:53, 47F
→
10/09 16:55, , 48F
10/09 16:55, 48F
噓
10/09 16:56, , 49F
10/09 16:56, 49F
推
10/09 16:58, , 50F
10/09 16:58, 50F
推
10/09 17:11, , 51F
10/09 17:11, 51F
推
10/09 17:23, , 52F
10/09 17:23, 52F
→
10/09 17:23, , 53F
10/09 17:23, 53F
噓
10/09 17:24, , 54F
10/09 17:24, 54F
噓
10/09 17:29, , 55F
10/09 17:29, 55F
→
10/09 17:30, , 56F
10/09 17:30, 56F
推
10/09 17:33, , 57F
10/09 17:33, 57F
→
10/09 17:34, , 58F
10/09 17:34, 58F
→
10/09 17:34, , 59F
10/09 17:34, 59F
推
10/09 17:36, , 60F
10/09 17:36, 60F
推
10/09 17:36, , 61F
10/09 17:36, 61F
→
10/09 18:01, , 62F
10/09 18:01, 62F
噓
10/09 18:25, , 63F
10/09 18:25, 63F
推
10/09 18:41, , 64F
10/09 18:41, 64F
噓
10/10 17:52, , 65F
10/10 17:52, 65F
→
10/10 17:53, , 66F
10/10 17:53, 66F
→
10/12 16:56, , 67F
10/12 16:56, 67F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 11 篇):