[新聞]健保署不想「養」病人 C肝新藥納健保有變數消失
1.媒體來源:
聯合影音
2.完整新聞標題:
健保署不想「養」病人 C肝新藥納健保有變數
3.完整新聞內文:
C肝新藥療效極佳,衛福部長林奏延七月拍板納入健保,但經費來源未有定案,恐
有變卦。健保署長李伯璋今日出席健保會總額協商前的公聽會,他表示,醫院花費
幾百億治療C肝卻未治癒,無疑是在「養病人」,但目前無公務預算補助,因此盼
由病人部份負擔,但一切尊重下周健保會討論。
台灣有近60萬C肝病患,若不治療導致慢性肝炎甚至肝癌,但超過17萬人未接受治
療,更估計有28萬人未被診斷出來。在C肝用藥試辦計畫中,自101年至今年六月,
既有的C肝病人數自1萬3千餘人上升至1萬9千餘人,每年花費11至20億不等,健保署
長李伯璋認為,這是在「養病人」,病人治療一半,跟沒有治療是一樣的。
C肝新藥有9成以上的機會根治疾病,副作用少,治療週期能減至12周,然而即使日
前目前艾伯維、必治妥兩家藥廠同意將療程治療價格壓至25萬元,但以每年優先給
付對象1至1.5萬人估算,每年需花費25至37.5億元左右。
李伯璋表示,新藥所需預算龐大,擠壓健保總額,排擠其他醫療服務,故無法在預
算來源確定前,取得一致意見讓C肝新藥納入健保給付。C肝防治今年來不及由國家
編列預算處理,目前健保預算如何編列、是否納入民眾部分負擔機制、何時上路均
未擬定,一切待下周健保會協商。但未來會考慮與亞洲鄰近國家如韓國、新加坡與
日本協商,共同向藥廠議價,壓低價格。
4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
https://video.udn.com/news/559857
5.備註:
柯文哲: 現在醫療界的狀況是「醫術越好越賺不到錢」,因為醫院採用PPF(生產
可能性曲線)的業績抽成制度發錢,醫生看一個病人就可抽成,因此會「用複雜的醫
療方式把病人醫好」,病人越慘,醫生賺得越多
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 124.11.173.42
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1473906742.A.3AC.html
※ 編輯: king19880326 (124.11.173.42), 09/15/2016 10:32:49
→
09/15 10:33, , 1F
09/15 10:33, 1F
推
09/15 10:33, , 2F
09/15 10:33, 2F
推
09/15 10:33, , 3F
09/15 10:33, 3F
→
09/15 10:33, , 4F
09/15 10:33, 4F
推
09/15 10:34, , 5F
09/15 10:34, 5F
推
09/15 10:34, , 6F
09/15 10:34, 6F
噓
09/15 10:34, , 7F
09/15 10:34, 7F
推
09/15 10:34, , 8F
09/15 10:34, 8F
→
09/15 10:35, , 9F
09/15 10:35, 9F
→
09/15 10:35, , 10F
09/15 10:35, 10F
→
09/15 10:35, , 11F
09/15 10:35, 11F
→
09/15 10:35, , 12F
09/15 10:35, 12F
→
09/15 10:35, , 13F
09/15 10:35, 13F
噓
09/15 10:35, , 14F
09/15 10:35, 14F
→
09/15 10:35, , 15F
09/15 10:35, 15F
→
09/15 10:36, , 16F
09/15 10:36, 16F
→
09/15 10:36, , 17F
09/15 10:36, 17F
→
09/15 10:38, , 18F
09/15 10:38, 18F
推
09/15 10:38, , 19F
09/15 10:38, 19F
推
09/15 10:39, , 20F
09/15 10:39, 20F
噓
09/15 10:39, , 21F
09/15 10:39, 21F
→
09/15 10:39, , 22F
09/15 10:39, 22F
→
09/15 10:39, , 23F
09/15 10:39, 23F
→
09/15 10:41, , 24F
09/15 10:41, 24F
→
09/15 10:42, , 25F
09/15 10:42, 25F
推
09/15 10:42, , 26F
09/15 10:42, 26F
→
09/15 10:43, , 27F
09/15 10:43, 27F
推
09/15 10:43, , 28F
09/15 10:43, 28F
→
09/15 10:44, , 29F
09/15 10:44, 29F
→
09/15 10:44, , 30F
09/15 10:44, 30F
推
09/15 10:44, , 31F
09/15 10:44, 31F
→
09/15 10:44, , 32F
09/15 10:44, 32F
→
09/15 10:46, , 33F
09/15 10:46, 33F
→
09/15 10:46, , 34F
09/15 10:46, 34F
推
09/15 10:47, , 35F
09/15 10:47, 35F
推
09/15 10:50, , 36F
09/15 10:50, 36F
→
09/15 10:51, , 37F
09/15 10:51, 37F
→
09/15 10:51, , 38F
09/15 10:51, 38F
→
09/15 10:55, , 39F
09/15 10:55, 39F
→
09/15 10:56, , 40F
09/15 10:56, 40F
→
09/15 11:05, , 41F
09/15 11:05, 41F
→
09/15 11:06, , 42F
09/15 11:06, 42F
→
09/15 11:12, , 43F
09/15 11:12, 43F
推
09/15 11:22, , 44F
09/15 11:22, 44F
推
09/15 11:24, , 45F
09/15 11:24, 45F
→
09/15 11:25, , 46F
09/15 11:25, 46F
推
09/15 11:31, , 47F
09/15 11:31, 47F
推
09/15 11:32, , 48F
09/15 11:32, 48F
噓
09/15 11:32, , 49F
09/15 11:32, 49F
推
09/15 11:33, , 50F
09/15 11:33, 50F
推
09/15 11:43, , 51F
09/15 11:43, 51F
推
09/15 11:59, , 52F
09/15 11:59, 52F
噓
09/15 12:11, , 53F
09/15 12:11, 53F
噓
09/15 12:13, , 54F
09/15 12:13, 54F
→
09/15 12:14, , 55F
09/15 12:14, 55F
→
09/15 12:15, , 56F
09/15 12:15, 56F
噓
09/15 12:19, , 57F
09/15 12:19, 57F
→
09/15 12:19, , 58F
09/15 12:19, 58F
→
09/15 12:27, , 59F
09/15 12:27, 59F
推
09/15 14:48, , 60F
09/15 14:48, 60F
推
09/15 15:01, , 61F
09/15 15:01, 61F
→
09/15 15:02, , 62F
09/15 15:02, 62F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):