Re: [新聞] 護孕妻殺賊 男子改判2月徒刑定讞消失
事實上就是被告證詞自相矛盾才會敗訴
"我怕老婆有危險"
->發現浴室有人,選擇主動闖入把人逼出來
疑點:死者自己躲起來了,你如果怕老婆有危險不是應該帶老婆退出去嗎?
"我只學過割草,不知道這樣會死,但是我怕他窒息有放鬆力道"
->怕他窒息就是知道他會死,而且最後還是死了
"他一直掙扎所以我只好一直壓制"
->老婆拍的影片和警員證詞都表明死者已癱軟無動靜
舉證之所在,敗訴之所在
--
至於鄉民講的甚麼如果小偷有武器
->怕小偷有武器還主動去撞門把小偷逼出來?
還有甚麼以後都不要反抗讓老婆被強姦
->明明就是一個躲浴室的沒膽小偷,扯甚麼強姦?
甚麼被殺跟判刑要選哪一個
->同上,而且跟緩刑兩年比起來,有人會選被殺嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.160.165.3
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1473141413.A.130.html
※ 編輯: killeryuan (1.160.165.3), 09/06/2016 13:57:40
噓
09/06 13:58, , 1F
09/06 13:58, 1F
偷竊是死罪?
→
09/06 13:58, , 2F
09/06 13:58, 2F
那是人家的法定權利
→
09/06 13:58, , 3F
09/06 13:58, 3F
他自己躲在浴室裡,你說呢?
推
09/06 13:59, , 4F
09/06 13:59, 4F
→
09/06 13:59, , 5F
09/06 13:59, 5F
→
09/06 14:00, , 6F
09/06 14:00, 6F
你可以選擇報警讓警察去抓
→
09/06 14:01, , 7F
09/06 14:01, 7F
推
09/06 14:01, , 8F
09/06 14:01, 8F
※ 編輯: killeryuan (1.160.165.3), 09/06/2016 14:03:17
→
09/06 14:01, , 9F
09/06 14:01, 9F
→
09/06 14:02, , 10F
09/06 14:02, 10F
噓
09/06 14:03, , 11F
09/06 14:03, 11F
→
09/06 14:04, , 12F
09/06 14:04, 12F
噓
09/06 14:04, , 13F
09/06 14:04, 13F
→
09/06 14:04, , 14F
09/06 14:04, 14F
噓
09/06 14:19, , 15F
09/06 14:19, 15F
噓
09/06 14:23, , 16F
09/06 14:23, 16F
推
09/06 14:25, , 17F
09/06 14:25, 17F
→
09/06 14:25, , 18F
09/06 14:25, 18F
噓
09/06 14:25, , 19F
09/06 14:25, 19F
→
09/06 14:26, , 20F
09/06 14:26, 20F
→
09/06 14:26, , 21F
09/06 14:26, 21F
推
09/06 14:39, , 22F
09/06 14:39, 22F
→
09/06 14:39, , 23F
09/06 14:39, 23F
→
09/06 14:40, , 24F
09/06 14:40, 24F
→
09/06 14:41, , 25F
09/06 14:41, 25F
→
09/06 14:51, , 26F
09/06 14:51, 26F
噓
09/06 14:52, , 27F
09/06 14:52, 27F
→
09/06 14:52, , 28F
09/06 14:52, 28F
→
09/06 14:52, , 29F
09/06 14:52, 29F
→
09/06 14:53, , 30F
09/06 14:53, 30F
推
09/06 14:53, , 31F
09/06 14:53, 31F
→
09/06 14:54, , 32F
09/06 14:54, 32F
推
09/06 15:41, , 33F
09/06 15:41, 33F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 7 之 13 篇):