[問卦] 為何光能無法取代電能作為能量傳輸形式?消失
如題,各位鄉民午安
和電纜傳輸電能比起來,光纖傳輸光能不會有電阻問題
也不會發生電線走火或觸電意外的可能
無論是能量衰減還是使用安全性光纖都比電纜傳輸電能要好得多
可是人類至今卻還是將電能作為能量傳輸的主要形式
身為文組麻瓜的我,對此感到很好奇既然光能有這些優勢
為何人類不使用理論上較安全的光能驅動”光器”而仍使用較危險的電能呢?
各位理組領域的專家先進能不能為我解答呢?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.136.125.149
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1458193323.A.0F1.html
→
03/17 13:42, , 1F
03/17 13:42, 1F
→
03/17 13:42, , 2F
03/17 13:42, 2F
推
03/17 13:43, , 3F
03/17 13:43, 3F
推
03/17 13:44, , 4F
03/17 13:44, 4F
推
03/17 13:45, , 5F
03/17 13:45, 5F
推
03/17 13:45, , 6F
03/17 13:45, 6F
→
03/17 13:46, , 7F
03/17 13:46, 7F
→
03/17 13:47, , 8F
03/17 13:47, 8F
→
03/17 13:47, , 9F
03/17 13:47, 9F
推
03/17 13:47, , 10F
03/17 13:47, 10F
→
03/17 13:49, , 11F
03/17 13:49, 11F
→
03/17 13:50, , 12F
03/17 13:50, 12F
→
03/17 13:51, , 13F
03/17 13:51, 13F
推
03/17 13:52, , 14F
03/17 13:52, 14F
→
03/17 13:52, , 15F
03/17 13:52, 15F
→
03/17 13:54, , 16F
03/17 13:54, 16F
→
03/17 13:55, , 17F
03/17 13:55, 17F
→
03/17 13:55, , 18F
03/17 13:55, 18F
→
03/17 13:56, , 19F
03/17 13:56, 19F
→
03/17 13:56, , 20F
03/17 13:56, 20F
→
03/17 13:57, , 21F
03/17 13:57, 21F
→
03/17 13:57, , 22F
03/17 13:57, 22F
→
03/17 13:57, , 23F
03/17 13:57, 23F
推
03/17 13:58, , 24F
03/17 13:58, 24F
推
03/17 13:58, , 25F
03/17 13:58, 25F
→
03/17 13:58, , 26F
03/17 13:58, 26F
→
03/17 13:58, , 27F
03/17 13:58, 27F
→
03/17 13:59, , 28F
03/17 13:59, 28F
→
03/17 13:59, , 29F
03/17 13:59, 29F
→
03/17 13:59, , 30F
03/17 13:59, 30F
→
03/17 14:00, , 31F
03/17 14:00, 31F
推
03/17 14:00, , 32F
03/17 14:00, 32F
→
03/17 14:00, , 33F
03/17 14:00, 33F
→
03/17 14:00, , 34F
03/17 14:00, 34F
→
03/17 14:02, , 35F
03/17 14:02, 35F