Re: [FB] 關於台北市塞車消失
有沒有人想過自行車車道只是個幌子
重點是要縮減那幾條過寬的路
路太寬反而造成道路縮減時堆積疏通不易而特別容易塞
縮減反而能讓整體台北交通更順暢?
※ 引述《EXPCDR (EXPCDR)》之銘言:
: 對於台北市塞車問題有人做了一張圖
: http://i.imgur.com/Kp0kcmy.jpg

: 網址裡頭大家一面倒的都在批評柯
: 害本魯不曉得是我資訊錯誤還是沒有注意到這部分
: 網址如下
: https://goo.gl/0223sL
: 本人沒有任何預設立場 只是想問大家
: 這是真的還是再唬爛的?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 123.192.40.90
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1454344449.A.597.html
噓
02/02 00:35, , 1F
02/02 00:35, 1F
推
02/02 00:35, , 2F
02/02 00:35, 2F
→
02/02 00:35, , 3F
02/02 00:35, 3F
→
02/02 00:35, , 4F
02/02 00:35, 4F
→
02/02 00:36, , 5F
02/02 00:36, 5F
噓
02/02 00:36, , 6F
02/02 00:36, 6F
噓
02/02 00:36, , 7F
02/02 00:36, 7F
像進出復興南北路的都是小於三線道,過民權後突然變四線道,這不是反而讓進出變堵塞嗎?以柯批對流體力學的學養應該一眼就看出問題
※ 編輯: soulivee (123.192.40.90), 02/02/2016 00:39:06
噓
02/02 00:37, , 8F
02/02 00:37, 8F
噓
02/02 00:37, , 9F
02/02 00:37, 9F
噓
02/02 00:38, , 10F
02/02 00:38, 10F
噓
02/02 00:38, , 11F
02/02 00:38, 11F
推
02/02 00:38, , 12F
02/02 00:38, 12F
噓
02/02 00:38, , 13F
02/02 00:38, 13F
→
02/02 00:39, , 14F
02/02 00:39, 14F
噓
02/02 00:39, , 15F
02/02 00:39, 15F
噓
02/02 00:39, , 16F
02/02 00:39, 16F
※ 編輯: soulivee (123.192.40.90), 02/02/2016 00:41:15
→
02/02 00:41, , 17F
02/02 00:41, 17F
推
02/02 00:42, , 18F
02/02 00:42, 18F
※ 編輯: soulivee (123.192.40.90), 02/02/2016 00:43:27
推
02/02 00:42, , 19F
02/02 00:42, 19F
推
02/02 00:43, , 20F
02/02 00:43, 20F
※ 編輯: soulivee (123.192.40.90), 02/02/2016 00:43:47
※ 編輯: soulivee (123.192.40.90), 02/02/2016 00:45:22
推
02/02 00:47, , 21F
02/02 00:47, 21F
噓
02/02 00:51, , 22F
02/02 00:51, 22F
推
02/02 00:52, , 23F
02/02 00:52, 23F
轉彎車流應該不會比直線大,而且大路也有紅綠燈管制
※ 編輯: soulivee (123.192.40.90), 02/02/2016 01:05:02
※ 編輯: soulivee (123.192.40.90), 02/02/2016 01:08:35
→
02/02 01:23, , 24F
02/02 01:23, 24F
噓
02/02 01:52, , 25F
02/02 01:52, 25F
→
02/02 03:05, , 26F
02/02 03:05, 26F
討論串 (同標題文章)