[轉錄]Re: [暴卦] 有沒有釣魚台不是台灣的八卦?有耶!
※ [本文轉錄自 Gossiping 看板]
作者: birdy590 (Birdy) 看板: Gossiping
標題: Re: [暴卦] 有沒有釣魚台不是台灣的八卦?有耶!
時間: Mon Jun 16 21:46:50 2008
※ 引述《wahaha99 (此方不可長)》之銘言:
個人整理的日本方看法
1. 先佔, 確認係無人荒島後於 1895 年登島建碑並設立工廠, 留有照片紀錄
最多時住有超過 200 人, 島上事業到 1940 年結束
之間從無償租用->付租金->買下
2. 一直到 1945 年前沒有任何國家表示異議
還有那份中華民國名義發的公文書, 表示並非不知情狀態
3. 舊金山和約中放棄台灣, 另一條文託管南西群島(包含釣魚台)
4. 台灣未參與但間接承認舊金山和約
5. 美國在託管時期曾借用釣魚台, 每年並付給地主租金
6. 託管結束, 沖繩返還
容易擊倒的常見證據
1. 慈禧太后將釣魚台賜封給盛宣懷的諭旨, 已被多名兩岸學者證明係偽造
挺厲害的, 目標遠大的詐騙集團
2. 因為漁業糾紛,由東京裁判所判決,尖閣列島隸屬當時處於日本統治下的臺北州
經查與報載事件經過不符, 研判是老人家記錯
歡迎補充, 對台灣有利的也可以
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 203.204.216.34
※ 編輯: birdy590 來自: 203.204.216.34 (06/16 21:47)
噓
06/16 21:47,
06/16 21:47
推
06/16 21:47,
06/16 21:47
推
06/16 21:48,
06/16 21:48
→
06/16 21:48,
06/16 21:48
推
06/16 21:49,
06/16 21:49
推
06/16 21:49,
06/16 21:49
推
06/16 21:49,
06/16 21:49
→
06/16 21:49,
06/16 21:49
→
06/16 21:49,
06/16 21:49
推
06/16 21:50,
06/16 21:50
→
06/16 21:50,
06/16 21:50
→
06/16 21:50,
06/16 21:50
→
06/16 21:50,
06/16 21:50
噓
06/16 21:50,
06/16 21:50
→
06/16 21:51,
06/16 21:51
推
06/16 21:51,
06/16 21:51
→
06/16 21:51,
06/16 21:51
→
06/16 21:51,
06/16 21:51
推
06/16 21:51,
06/16 21:51
推
06/16 21:51,
06/16 21:51
→
06/16 21:52,
06/16 21:52
推
06/16 21:52,
06/16 21:52
→
06/16 21:52,
06/16 21:52
→
06/16 21:52,
06/16 21:52
推
06/16 21:52,
06/16 21:52
→
06/16 21:52,
06/16 21:52
→
06/16 21:52,
06/16 21:52
→
06/16 21:52,
06/16 21:52
→
06/16 21:52,
06/16 21:52
→
06/16 21:53,
06/16 21:53
→
06/16 21:53,
06/16 21:53
推
06/16 21:53,
06/16 21:53
→
06/16 21:53,
06/16 21:53
推
06/16 21:53,
06/16 21:53
→
06/16 21:54,
06/16 21:54
推
06/16 21:54,
06/16 21:54
→
06/16 21:54,
06/16 21:54
推
06/16 21:54,
06/16 21:54
→
06/16 21:54,
06/16 21:54
→
06/16 21:54,
06/16 21:54
→
06/16 21:54,
06/16 21:54
推
06/16 21:55,
06/16 21:55
→
06/16 21:55,
06/16 21:55
噓
06/16 21:55,
06/16 21:55
→
06/16 21:55,
06/16 21:55
→
06/16 21:55,
06/16 21:55
噓
06/16 21:55,
06/16 21:55
→
06/16 21:55,
06/16 21:55
→
06/16 21:56,
06/16 21:56
→
06/16 21:56,
06/16 21:56
→
06/16 21:56,
06/16 21:56
推
06/16 21:56,
06/16 21:56
→
06/16 21:56,
06/16 21:56
→
06/16 21:57,
06/16 21:57
→
06/16 21:57,
06/16 21:57
→
06/16 21:57,
06/16 21:57
→
06/16 21:57,
06/16 21:57
→
06/16 21:58,
06/16 21:58
→
06/16 21:58,
06/16 21:58
推
06/16 21:58,
06/16 21:58
→
06/16 21:58,
06/16 21:58
→
06/16 21:58,
06/16 21:58
噓
06/16 21:59,
06/16 21:59
→
06/16 21:59,
06/16 21:59
推
06/16 21:59,
06/16 21:59
→
06/16 22:00,
06/16 22:00
→
06/16 22:00,
06/16 22:00
推
06/16 22:00,
06/16 22:00
→
06/16 22:00,
06/16 22:00
→
06/16 22:00,
06/16 22:00
→
06/16 22:06,
06/16 22:06
推
06/16 22:06,
06/16 22:06
→
06/16 22:08,
06/16 22:08
→
06/16 22:10,
06/16 22:10
→
06/16 22:13,
06/16 22:13
推
06/16 22:13,
06/16 22:13
→
06/16 22:16,
06/16 22:16
噓
06/16 22:16,
06/16 22:16
→
06/16 22:17,
06/16 22:17
→
06/16 22:17,
06/16 22:17
→
06/16 22:20,
06/16 22:20
→
06/16 22:21,
06/16 22:21
→
06/16 22:22,
06/16 22:22
噓
06/16 22:23,
06/16 22:23
推
06/16 22:26,
06/16 22:26
→
06/16 22:30,
06/16 22:30
→
06/16 22:30,
06/16 22:30
推
06/16 23:19,
06/16 23:19
--
=============================
Boundary representation is
not necessarily authoriative.
=============================
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 210.60.2.68
討論串 (同標題文章)