Re: [問題]OG-SC-67
※ 引述《chenemily (天天保持好心情)》之銘言：
: Affording strategic proximity to the Strait of Gibraltar, Morocco was also of
: interest to the French throughout the first half of the twentieth century
: because they assumed that if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was
: always insecure.
: (A) if they did not hold it, their grip on Algeria was always insecure
: (B) without it their grip on Algeria would never be secure
: (C) their grip on Algeria was not ever secure if they did not hold it
: (D) without that, they could never be secure about their grip on Algeria
: (E) never would their grip on Algeria be secure if they did not hold it
: 請問這題該怎麼解?
: 我原本是想說it指代不清 因為有可能指代Morocco or the Strait of Gibraltar
: 但是每個選項都有It
: 而且OG好像不認為it有指代the Strait of Gibraltar的可能
: 他只說再C & E會有指代Algeria or Morocco
: 除了用代名詞還有其他可以判斷的地方嗎?!!
: 請高手幫忙囉 <(_ _)>
通常我不建議用指代不清解題, 比較建議您改變判題角度, 用“是否有必要使用代名詞”
這點, 比較不會將正確答案刪除.
基本上這裡可以先用concise看, if they did not hold it和without it當然後者比較
簡潔, 可以少用代名詞盡量少用, 符合gmat標準英文的看法
另外這裡也有考“與過去事實相反”的考點, 這點可以從assumed這個字眼判斷出, 對過
去事件做假設,這個時候if對應的主要子句最好有would, 表達假設語氣, 答案A的主要子
句用過去式是在描述過去“事實”, 所以可以排除
--
A兔GMAT作戰中心
http://tw.myblog.yahoo.com/tootoo5478/
歡迎加入FB社團A2 GMAT掌握GMAT考試資訊
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.248.66.212
討論串 (同標題文章)