[問題] OG12-CR-63

看板GMAT作者 (天天保持好心情)時間13年前 (2011/03/28 22:40), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/3 (看更多)
When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, "No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies. Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above? (A)Why does the part that replies not answer, "Yes"? (B)Why are the observed facts in need of any special explanation? (C)Why do the subjects appear to accept the hypnotist's suggestion that they are deaf? (D)Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the same way in the situation described? (E)Why are the separate parts of the self the same for all subjects? 請問這題到底在反駁什麼呢?? 題目看的不是很懂 題目好像是在說:已經被催眠是聾子的人 當催眠師問他是否聽的到,他們回答"聽不到" 然後後面講的好複雜 有好心人可以來解釋一下嗎 P.S為什麼我覺得這題的出題風格跟PP差很多 我只求650 這會很難嗎 我越來越覺得自己是白癡了 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 219.85.250.76
文章代碼(AID): #1Da9tipr (GMAT)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1Da9tipr (GMAT)