Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enigB97FEA6B9A0C0983989EA20A
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Am 12/15/11 14:58, schrieb Daniel Kalchev:
>=20
> On Dec 15, 2011, at 3:48 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>=20
> [=85]
>> That said: thrown out, data ignored, done.
>>
>> Now what? Where are we? We're right back where we were a day or two
>> ago; meaning no closer to solving the dilemma reported by users and
>> SCHED_ULE. Heck, we're not even sure if there is an issue, other than=
>> some folks confirming that SCHED_4BSD performs better for them (that's=
>> what started this whole thread), and there are at least a couple which=
>> have stated this.
>=20
> But, are any of these benchmarks really engaging the 4BSD/ULE scheduler=
differences? Most such benchmarks are run on a system with no other load=
whatsoever and in no way represent real world experience.
>=20
> What is more, I believe in such benchmarks "the system feels sluggish" =
is not measured at all. Even if it is measured, if in such case the bench=
mark finishes "better" - that is, faster, or say, makes the system freeze=
for the user for the duration of the test -- it will be considered "win"=
, because the benchmark suite ran faster on that particular system -- whe=
reas a system which ran the benchmark fast, provided good interactive res=
ponse etc would be considered "loser".
I guess you have some proofs on that "feeling"?
>=20
> I think it is not good idea to hijack this thread, but instead focusing=
on the other SCHED_ULE bashing thread to define an reasonable benchmark =
or a set of benchmarks rather -- so that many would run it and provide fe=
edback.
>=20
>=20
> Daniel_______________________________________________
--------------enigB97FEA6B9A0C0983989EA20A
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO6jXLAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8eHMH+gIP8qH2klzQvMwrpp40QhU1
E1Bd4Q13P5RAc69oJJWdBzz4jV9Oz9aJZzpc4uHnFI9FyxBVY9LL3QVuX3cErK7u
NmxS6Hl3AkrfAZ2I0O/XGq6LF6Kmcw83LCKWubexRAaIIr4YjZd/AiTd5TlU1nyy
Nml9b8yyJlt9aggS22TO6UTnqRxcvqFQhP8hAZnPjYsoN6sDd3TRynAJqNc7LWeW
P8jBxo2+gqEnNDl4LYrr+RDM6Gsbr3k2+YYK98miX/DUHBLEBx0liVCpy+lPNWhl
XBqGGGPjveUqBEVvUiOixU7aO8rxQDnL3PBSdreL7xeOTvP9bRdZ1lnaxpEq+4M=
=YwYJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enigB97FEA6B9A0C0983989EA20A--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 10 之 124 篇)：