Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig47BAA14E1A027AA130B37E10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 01/04/2012 20:52, Matthew Tippett wrote:
>
> As a service to the community or vendor that publishes the tuning
> guide, Michael is more than willing to redo a tuned vs untuned
> comparison. To date, the communities have never taken us up on that
> offer. In part, this affects Phoronix.com <http://Phoronix.com>'s
> perception in the public, but that is more of a result of a one sided
> discussion by a party external to a particular community (with a
> healthy touch of journalisticly pumped compare & contrast). For the
> FreeBSD community, who else outside of the FreeBSD community actually
> runs public comparisons of FreeBSD against anything?
If you just want to benchmark defaults, please, use proper defaults and
don't do a *custom* ZFS setup (which was IMHO a pretty big and gross
mistake).
I would be interested in a benchmark that does significant tests with
same hardware and REAL default setup.
It would be awesome if those benchmarks were re-done that way, so we can
compare an out-of-the-box experience even if that's not the last word on
how a system will perform (as others said, no one uses a default setup
for their servers)
And, if anyone else suggests a tuned-system benchmark ... I'm ok with
that too as long it's done properly and with guidance of a person of the
community that can give proper advice.
I'm a regular reader of Phoronix because it's basically easier than
being subscribed to a couple of mailing lists, blogs and such just to
get latest information on developments.
And the site is fairly popular, so you hold a pretty big responsibility
in there.
I got really disappointed on how a bad benchmark could impact on the
reputation of FreeBSD.
Things that are not true that people will be repeating (not-so-long-ago
I was a moderator on a Linux forum and I saw that misinformation in
action, it's terrible !)
Sorry if the words sound strong ... but I'm glad that these benchmarks
can be re-done.
Thanks for reading !
--------------enig47BAA14E1A027AA130B37E10
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)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=UXym
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig47BAA14E1A027AA130B37E10--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 119 之 124 篇)：