Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig90C2E873E806961B03779663
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Am 12/15/11 14:51, schrieb Daniel Kalchev:
>=20
> On Dec 15, 2011, at 3:25 PM, Stefan Esser wrote:
>=20
>> Am 15.12.2011 11:10, schrieb Michael Larabel:
>>> No, the same hardware was used for each OS.
>>>
>>> In terms of the software, the stock software stack for each OS was us=
ed.
>>
>> Just curious: Why did you choose ZFS on FreeBSD, while UFS2 (with
>> journaling enabled) should be an obvious choice since it is more simil=
ar
>> in concept to ext4 and since that is what most FreeBSD users will use
>> with FreeBSD?
>=20
>=20
> Or perhaps, since it is "server" Linux distribution, use ZFS on Linux a=
s well. With identical tuning on both Linux and FreeBSD. Having the same =
FS used by both OS will help make the comparison more sensible for FS I/O=
=2E
>=20
> Daniel_______________________________________________
Since ZFS in Linux can only be achieved via FUSE (ad far as I know), it
is legitimate to compare ZFS and ext4. It would be much more competetive
to compare Linux BTRFS and FreeBSD ZFS.
Each OS does optimize on different filesystems and a user/manager can
assume that the vendor offers the best performance available by turning
on the default FS by a standard stock installation.
Using ZFS on Linux would be a great disadvantage and the benchmark would
turn out the same bullsh... as comparing Linux-domain only with FreeBSD
weknesses only ...
Linux distributions offer setups for desktop and server. The FreeBSD
folks have the choice to do it themselfes. And maybe I'm one of those
puritain people appreciating this. "Out of the box" OS is Windooze, with
all its consequences.
Oliver
Post scriptum:
It seems to be hard to follow the benchmark environment on Phoronix
since the URL refers to a setup of different systems.
--------------enig90C2E873E806961B03779663
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO6jVeAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8ALYH/0un2B7HHTHdeoxEzN9UJ8x+
WhlqiupymlpJR2UJDkWlDRETa9JABFE6Iuc84iAPbcHExzyd6BbYMhr9pvX0OlCM
p1IWXUHrpXzr3fs3qoWtQIJi4yr6/Wb2dvJJHBK8tuwyOd2XR9GC4/sIwFXpw7Up
7343FJKIhZXpacEkJP/rQz9PxjcmifzuuDQhwjvrbTJDoJn5CQvya9gcVFExlTBS
2qHd7UwCjRf6xiu9lhTEtYy4O5uZoqSLeprxTEowP4DRwSbBJ33Ix0eAGmEc4vfB
OnijWNZVnR4J8VrSj1DXltb8t/wTKe9bWzT8lVf98cVK018vQ2h3juiASY/y++A=
=6R/p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig90C2E873E806961B03779663--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 8 之 124 篇)：