Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1

看板FB_current作者時間14年前 (2011/12/16 03:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串11/124 (看更多)
On 15 December 2011 17:58, O. Hartmann <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > Since ZFS in Linux can only be achieved via FUSE (ad far as I know), it > is legitimate to compare ZFS and ext4. It would be much more competetive > to compare Linux BTRFS and FreeBSD ZFS. > Er... does ext4 guarantee data integrity? You're not comparing like with like; please do some research on the point of ZFS before asserting that they're fair comparisons. A fair(er) comparison could be ext4 with UFS+soft-updates. Chris _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
文章代碼(AID): #1EwaFl9H (FB_current)
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 11 之 124 篇):
文章代碼(AID): #1EwaFl9H (FB_current)