Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1
--Sig_/E950_Ap3Vq1E8qCyz2buUn_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:31:55 -0800
<matthew@phoronix.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the comment Arnaud. For comparative benchmarking
> on [1]Phoronix.com, Michael inva configuration 'in the way the
> developers or production'. This is by rule. However, i poor
> scores on be 'it should be tuned, is configured for a diffe The
> response from us to this comes in two forms. &nb 1) If it is the
> wrong workload for the platform, do a public pos explaining and
> analysing the results. Highlighting the rationale fo r the
> concious reduction in performance (ie: journaling filesystems with
> ba filesystem integrity 2) If tuning can have a material impact
> on the results, post a t uning guide with step by step and
> rationale. Ie: educate the communit Michael and I have had many
> discussions with vendors an on this. In almost all cases, the
> vendor has either cha default configuration or accepted the results
> as valid. As guide, Micha comparison. To dat offer. In part,
> thi public, but that is more of a result of a one sided d party
> external to a particular community (with a healthy tou
> journalisticly pumped compare & contrast). For the FreeBSD
> community, who else outside of the FreeBSD community actually runs
> public c Matthew
Not really related to the discussion on hand, but the above about the
most unreadable email I am yet to read on the public mailing list.
--=20
Alexander Kabaev
--Sig_/E950_Ap3Vq1E8qCyz2buUn_
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFPBOV6Q6z1jMm+XZYRAn7AAKDDqfIxM5+mvV3YaP5WyZ7e0ed09QCgzKBU
P1N6ba6nwNiQNjP2lDWmJQI=
=05rk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Sig_/E950_Ap3Vq1E8qCyz2buUn_--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 122 之 124 篇)：