Re: [考題] 102年地特三等，法學緒論與英文，第39題
※ 引述《p2squarefx (拼命四郎)》之銘言：
: [考題] 國考歷屆考題與考題觀念討論(書裡看到的選這個)請附上想法、出處
: 39 How did researchers confirm their theory about the remarkable effect of
: sugar?
: (A)They stopped feeding both groups of mice any more sugar.
: (B)They found that both groups of mice lost interest in the sweet food.
: (C)They gave both groups of mice a drug that blocks the release of
: beta-endorphins.
: (D)They measured the amount of beta-endorphins released in the blood of the
: mice.
: 答案是C
: 依據題目，研究人員用來驗證假設的藥，明明是阻斷受器，而並非停止製造
: beta-endorphin，所以答案(C)是絕對錯誤:
: Researchers confirmed their theory by giving both groups of mice Naltrexone,
: a drug that blocks beta-endorphin receptors.
c沒錯吧...
你仔細看清楚c後面說的是blocks the release of beta-endorphins
意思是隔絕beta-endorphins的釋放
原文是說隔絕接受器官的功能 使它不能接受到beta-endorphins
為什麼你會覺得有問題?因為隔絕是兩面的...
你隔絕a釋放 同時不是也隔絕了b接受嗎?
c只是換個說法而已..
如果今天它本文是寫disable 那c可能就有問題了
: 因此，這題比較合理的答案應該是(B)，因為只要餵了那種藥，糖不再有意義，自然就
: 沒了興趣。
: If you take Naltrexone, it does not matter how many beta-endorphins you
: release—you will not get any relief from pain. Sure enough, when the sugar-fed
: mice were given Naltrexone, they lost all interest in the sweetsubstance。
: .....
: Numbed by Naltrexone, both groups of mice cried equally often. The poor baby
: mice were still depressed—but now even sugar could not make them feel better.
: 我有哪裡理解錯誤嗎，沒有的話就準備疑義了
一點也不合理吧...
你自己都說了 只要餵了那種藥 就不會對糖有興趣
b只是說兩組老鼠都對糖失去興趣
你只靠這句話就能驗證他們理論中糖的重要性?
完全沒頭沒尾啊 如果沒有本文的話 光是這題題目+b 誰看得懂...
我知道你這裡想說的是除了c以外最合理的答案
但是前提是c是錯的才有這必要...不過c我看來是沒啥問題啦..b錯的很明顯
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.31.135.162
推
12/24 15:13, , 1F
12/24 15:13, 1F
※ 編輯: mihaier 來自: 61.31.135.162 (12/24 15:15)
推
12/24 15:27, , 2F
12/24 15:27, 2F
推
12/25 11:07, , 3F
12/25 11:07, 3F
→
12/25 11:08, , 4F
12/25 11:08, 4F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文：
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 5 篇)：