Re: [文法] 時態文法題

看板Eng-Class作者 (my two cents)時間13年前 (2012/12/13 19:28), 編輯推噓3(3推 0噓 11→)
留言14則, 4人參與, 6年前最新討論串3/8 (看更多)
※ 引述《hopeliu (阿翔)》之銘言： : 某國中資優班文法題 : Cathy: It is really tired. : Peter: Yes. If there is an earthquake tomorrow, we ____________ . : (a) will have worked in vain : (b) worked in vain yesterday : (c) will have worked in vain yesterday : (d) will have worked in vain today : 註in vain: 徒勞無功 : 請問這題，答案a， : b選項錯誤的理由是？ : 歡迎各種指教， : 謝謝每位大大。 acd是屬於subjunctive/subjunctive b是屬於indicative/indicative b若你妹認為對的, 就先維持她的語感,就不要去解釋為何是indicative form. 此外,補充一下,類似句子及其語境. Suppose that a group of people worked yesterday on building a new dam. Their work is not yet completed, so it is crucial that it should not rain before they complete the work, otherwise what they have built so far may be washed away. Unfortunately, rain has been forecast for tomorrow. Under these circumstances, one of the workers might remark if it rains tomorrow, we'll have worked in vain yesterday. ****** ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^^^^^^^^^^ Comrie (1981:73) 這種句子很久就有了,不算是什麼難句,不用想的太難,並不會難懂. c選項懂了, d選項就不難理解. 而b選項, 這也是個類似句, If it rains tomorrow, we worked in vain yesterday. Comrie (1982) 我沒記錯Comrie教授是劍橋大學語言學博士,本身是英文母語人士, 時態文法教科書權威作者之一. 這些全是文法正確例子且 語境成立下是可能說出口(remark)的. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.32.58.58 ※ 編輯: tijj 來自: 114.32.58.58 (12/13 19:32)
推
12/13 20:49, , 1F
喔！！！ 我懂了 大感謝tijj大 小弟受教了 Orz
12/13 20:49, 1F
推
12/14 02:01, , 2F
sorry to trouble you again, so the differences among
12/14 02:01, 2F
→
12/14 02:01, , 3F
1)If it rains tomorrow, we would have worked in vain
12/14 02:01, 3F
→
12/14 02:01, , 4F
yesterday.
12/14 02:01, 4F
→
12/14 02:01, , 5F
2)If it rains tomorrow, we will have worked in vain
12/14 02:01, 5F
→
12/14 02:02, , 6F
yesterday.
12/14 02:02, 6F
→
12/14 02:02, , 7F
3)If it rains tomorrow, we worked in vain yesterday.
12/14 02:02, 7F
→
12/14 02:02, , 8F
lie in the speaker's confidence in whether their work
12/14 02:02, 8F
→
12/14 02:03, , 9F
done yesterday would be in vain or not?
12/14 02:03, 9F
推
12/14 02:07, , 10F
if so, is the order 3)>2)>1) correct? if not, then
12/14 02:07, 10F
→
12/14 02:08, , 11F
what differentiates them? thanks
12/14 02:08, 11F
→
09/07 00:12, , 12F
sorry to tr https://daxiv.com
09/07 00:12, 12F
→
12/02 18:27, , 13F
3)If it rai https://daxiv.com
12/02 18:27, 13F
→
04/13 22:46, 6年前 , 14F
done yester https://moxox.com
04/13 22:46, 14F
‣ 更多 tijj 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1GoRlC10 (Eng-Class)
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容：
以下文章回應了本文：
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 8 篇)：
排序： 最新先 | 最舊先 | 留言數
在新視窗開啟完整討論串 (共8篇)
‣ 更多 tijj 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1GoRlC10 (Eng-Class)