Re: [閒聊] 大家怎麼看美國最低工資調漲24%的議題
※ 引述《DarthRaider (低調的悠閒)》之銘言:
: 推 Aegisth:美國如果生產力這麼高,為何貿易赤字有增無減? 03/09 21:44
: → Aegisth:另如果我國勞動生產力真大幅提升,為何沒有競爭提高工資? 03/09 21:53
: → caseypie:美國的貿易赤字有增無減.....科科 03/09 21:57
: → Aegisth:前面修正一下,至少國債沒有減少過。 03/09 22:00
: 1.如何從國民所得帳推導出高勞動生產力就不能有貿易赤字或財政赤字的增加?
: p.s.其實柯林頓第二任執政後期有出現財政盈餘,小布希之後才又變成赤字
: 2.薪資沒有反映勞動生產力的直接後果就是人才外流、搶進相對有保障的公職
: (外國跟本國競爭;公部門跟私部門競
如果一個制度有問題,或設備有問題,或配合上有問題,甚至,任何一個,我
們有能力提出來的項目有問題,那麼,這些有能力的人也會出走,或是想要進入穩定而不
需要強調產出的公部門。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 189.32.33.130
→
03/10 11:34, , 1F
03/10 11:34, 1F
→
03/10 11:35, , 2F
03/10 11:35, 2F
→
03/10 18:40, , 3F
03/10 18:40, 3F
→
03/10 18:53, , 4F
03/10 18:53, 4F
→
03/10 18:55, , 5F
03/10 18:55, 5F
→
03/10 20:21, , 6F
03/10 20:21, 6F
→
03/10 20:23, , 7F
03/10 20:23, 7F
→
03/10 20:26, , 8F
03/10 20:26, 8F
→
03/10 20:29, , 9F
03/10 20:29, 9F
→
03/10 20:32, , 10F
03/10 20:32, 10F
→
03/10 20:34, , 11F
03/10 20:34, 11F
→
03/10 21:16, , 12F
03/10 21:16, 12F
→
03/10 21:19, , 13F
03/10 21:19, 13F
→
03/10 21:19, , 14F
03/10 21:19, 14F
→
03/10 21:21, , 15F
03/10 21:21, 15F
→
03/10 21:21, , 16F
03/10 21:21, 16F
→
03/10 21:23, , 17F
03/10 21:23, 17F
→
03/10 21:32, , 18F
03/10 21:32, 18F
→
03/10 21:33, , 19F
03/10 21:33, 19F
→
03/10 21:42, , 20F
03/10 21:42, 20F
→
03/10 21:42, , 21F
03/10 21:42, 21F
→
03/11 09:21, , 22F
03/11 09:21, 22F
推
03/12 00:20, , 23F
03/12 00:20, 23F
→
03/12 00:21, , 24F
03/12 00:21, 24F
→
03/12 00:22, , 25F
03/12 00:22, 25F
→
03/12 00:23, , 26F
03/12 00:23, 26F
→
03/12 00:24, , 27F
03/12 00:24, 27F
→
03/12 00:25, , 28F
03/12 00:25, 28F
→
03/12 07:54, , 29F
03/12 07:54, 29F
→
03/12 07:59, , 30F
03/12 07:59, 30F
→
03/12 08:01, , 31F
03/12 08:01, 31F
→
03/12 08:03, , 32F
03/12 08:03, 32F
→
03/12 08:07, , 33F
03/12 08:07, 33F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 9 之 11 篇):