[閒聊] 大家一隻單眼都用多久時間才用壞掉?
雖然在DC版有問 因為我發現DC幾乎沒有人是用壞掉淘汰的
主要是過時 摔到 泡水 被偷 賣掉 太久沒用電池膨脹 又電池沒賣
對我來講是好事 我是淬煉技術底的 所以用過時DC也玩很開心 像我隨手機還依然是s90
相對的 我倒是有聽過單眼用到壞掉的 雖然很大多數都是摔到或泡水才壞掉
1.單眼是因為以前很貴所以大家都用很長久 直到最後有故障壞掉嗎?
2.單眼最特別的是有計算快門數 簡直像汽車里程表一樣 越多轉手價越不利 不知道為何
當初單眼要設計快門數?
3.以查快門數量麻煩的方式感覺好像原始是要設計給原廠人員才懂的如何檢查.請問快門數
的多寡會影響相片的銳利度嗎?還是只影響快門維修的可能?
因為我的小DC s90好像拍越多 發現成像越不銳利 當然差微有夠小的 但還是感覺得出來
好險底片單眼沒有計算底片捲數的地方
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 88.105.54.222
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/DSLR/M.1445304312.A.2AD.html
推
10/20 09:33, , 1F
10/20 09:33, 1F
→
10/20 09:33, , 2F
10/20 09:33, 2F
推
10/20 09:36, , 3F
10/20 09:36, 3F
→
10/20 09:36, , 4F
10/20 09:36, 4F
→
10/20 09:36, , 5F
10/20 09:36, 5F
推
10/20 09:40, , 6F
10/20 09:40, 6F
→
10/20 09:42, , 7F
10/20 09:42, 7F
推
10/20 09:44, , 8F
10/20 09:44, 8F
→
10/20 09:44, , 9F
10/20 09:44, 9F
→
10/20 09:44, , 10F
10/20 09:44, 10F
推
10/20 09:47, , 11F
10/20 09:47, 11F
推
10/20 09:53, , 12F
10/20 09:53, 12F
推
10/20 09:54, , 13F
10/20 09:54, 13F
推
10/20 09:58, , 14F
10/20 09:58, 14F
推
10/20 10:03, , 15F
10/20 10:03, 15F
→
10/20 10:04, , 16F
10/20 10:04, 16F
→
10/20 10:05, , 17F
10/20 10:05, 17F
推
10/20 10:06, , 18F
10/20 10:06, 18F
推
10/20 10:08, , 19F
10/20 10:08, 19F
→
10/20 10:18, , 20F
10/20 10:18, 20F
→
10/20 10:19, , 21F
10/20 10:19, 21F
→
10/20 10:20, , 22F
10/20 10:20, 22F
→
10/20 10:21, , 23F
10/20 10:21, 23F
推
10/20 10:27, , 24F
10/20 10:27, 24F
推
10/20 10:33, , 25F
10/20 10:33, 25F
噓
10/20 10:40, , 26F
10/20 10:40, 26F
→
10/20 10:55, , 27F
10/20 10:55, 27F
推
10/20 11:00, , 28F
10/20 11:00, 28F
噓
10/20 11:03, , 29F
10/20 11:03, 29F
→
10/20 11:08, , 30F
10/20 11:08, 30F
→
10/20 11:09, , 31F
10/20 11:09, 31F
推
10/20 11:09, , 32F
10/20 11:09, 32F
→
10/20 11:10, , 33F
10/20 11:10, 33F
推
10/20 11:12, , 34F
10/20 11:12, 34F
→
10/20 11:13, , 35F
10/20 11:13, 35F
→
10/20 11:14, , 36F
10/20 11:14, 36F
推
10/20 11:56, , 37F
10/20 11:56, 37F
推
10/20 12:07, , 38F
10/20 12:07, 38F
→
10/20 12:07, , 39F
10/20 12:07, 39F
→
10/20 12:07, , 40F
10/20 12:07, 40F
→
10/20 12:17, , 41F
10/20 12:17, 41F
噓
10/20 12:25, , 42F
10/20 12:25, 42F
推
10/20 12:26, , 43F
10/20 12:26, 43F
推
10/20 12:52, , 44F
10/20 12:52, 44F
→
10/20 13:35, , 45F
10/20 13:35, 45F
噓
10/20 13:41, , 46F
10/20 13:41, 46F
推
10/20 13:46, , 47F
10/20 13:46, 47F
噓
10/20 14:18, , 48F
10/20 14:18, 48F
噓
10/20 14:58, , 49F
10/20 14:58, 49F
噓
10/20 15:01, , 50F
10/20 15:01, 50F
噓
10/20 16:50, , 51F
10/20 16:50, 51F
噓
10/20 18:07, , 52F
10/20 18:07, 52F
噓
10/20 19:18, , 53F
10/20 19:18, 53F
推
10/20 20:07, , 54F
10/20 20:07, 54F
→
10/20 21:43, , 55F
10/20 21:43, 55F
→
10/20 22:21, , 56F
10/20 22:21, 56F
噓
10/20 22:45, , 57F
10/20 22:45, 57F
噓
10/21 02:18, , 58F
10/21 02:18, 58F
→
10/21 04:11, , 59F
10/21 04:11, 59F
推
10/21 10:50, , 60F
10/21 10:50, 60F
→
10/21 10:50, , 61F
10/21 10:50, 61F
推
10/22 08:00, , 62F
10/22 08:00, 62F
→
10/22 08:00, , 63F
10/22 08:00, 63F
→
10/22 08:00, , 64F
10/22 08:00, 64F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 6 篇):