Re: [閒聊] 臺北與上海
臺北在城市硬體上大概就是貴陽的等級吧,和上海差了幾個等級
只是素質高一些
畢竟富裕時間比中國長
看貴陽影片
http://www.tudou.com/programs/view/4WRf-RHb-5w/?resourceId=0_06_02_99
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 151.33.13.205
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/CrossStrait/M.1407513753.A.E70.html
推
08/09 00:13, , 1F
08/09 00:13, 1F
→
08/09 00:29, , 2F
08/09 00:29, 2F
→
08/09 00:31, , 3F
08/09 00:31, 3F
----------------------------------
硬體就是城市建設,高樓大廈,馬路橋梁
→
08/09 00:32, , 4F
08/09 00:32, 4F
→
08/09 00:35, , 5F
08/09 00:35, 5F
→
08/09 00:38, , 6F
08/09 00:38, 6F
→
08/09 00:40, , 7F
08/09 00:40, 7F
推
08/09 00:41, , 8F
08/09 00:41, 8F
※ 編輯: esolve (151.33.20.229), 08/09/2014 00:42:52
→
08/09 00:42, , 9F
08/09 00:42, 9F
→
08/09 00:44, , 10F
08/09 00:44, 10F
→
08/09 00:45, , 11F
08/09 00:45, 11F
→
08/09 00:48, , 12F
08/09 00:48, 12F
---------------------------------------
上海是和紐約東京巴黎比的
臺北和上海比。。那不是一個等級,沒啥比的
要說優點,拿個小城市也可能有比紐約強的地方,說明不了什么
※ 編輯: esolve (151.33.20.229), 08/09/2014 00:50:03
※ 編輯: esolve (151.33.20.229), 08/09/2014 00:50:32
推
08/09 00:51, , 13F
08/09 00:51, 13F
→
08/09 00:51, , 14F
08/09 00:51, 14F
--------------------------------------
陜西神木從幼兒園到高中免費教育,免費醫療,所以?
江蘇華西還共產主義呢,大學學費都包了,家家戶戶別墅寶馬呢
※ 編輯: esolve (151.33.20.229), 08/09/2014 00:55:11
→
08/09 00:54, , 15F
08/09 00:54, 15F
推
08/09 00:55, , 16F
08/09 00:55, 16F
※ 編輯: esolve (151.33.20.229), 08/09/2014 00:57:00
→
08/09 00:55, , 17F
08/09 00:55, 17F
→
08/09 00:57, , 18F
08/09 00:57, 18F
※ 編輯: esolve (151.33.20.229), 08/09/2014 00:58:59
→
08/09 01:05, , 19F
08/09 01:05, 19F
→
08/09 01:06, , 20F
08/09 01:06, 20F
→
08/09 01:08, , 21F
08/09 01:08, 21F
--------------------------------
所以神木 華西比臺北好
紐約不配世界都市
※ 編輯: esolve (151.33.20.229), 08/09/2014 01:09:20
→
08/09 01:09, , 22F
08/09 01:09, 22F
-----------------------------
另外記住一點,中國一直在進步,臺灣和臺北就這樣了
※ 編輯: esolve (151.33.20.229), 08/09/2014 01:11:09
→
08/09 01:12, , 23F
08/09 01:12, 23F
→
08/09 01:14, , 24F
08/09 01:14, 24F
---------------------------------
我上面不是一直在強調臺北不是和上海比,而是和貴陽南寧比麼?
※ 編輯: esolve (151.33.20.229), 08/09/2014 01:16:05
→
08/09 01:16, , 25F
08/09 01:16, 25F
→
08/09 01:19, , 26F
08/09 01:19, 26F
→
08/09 01:22, , 27F
08/09 01:22, 27F
→
08/09 01:23, , 28F
08/09 01:23, 28F
→
08/09 01:25, , 29F
08/09 01:25, 29F
→
08/09 01:28, , 30F
08/09 01:28, 30F
→
08/09 01:32, , 31F
08/09 01:32, 31F
→
08/09 01:33, , 32F
08/09 01:33, 32F
→
08/09 01:35, , 33F
08/09 01:35, 33F
→
08/09 01:36, , 34F
08/09 01:36, 34F
----------------------------------
我開宗明義就說了在硬體建設上臺北和貴陽比
沒說全面比
※ 編輯: esolve (151.33.20.229), 08/09/2014 01:56:28
推
08/09 02:43, , 35F
08/09 02:43, 35F
→
08/09 02:44, , 36F
08/09 02:44, 36F
→
08/09 02:45, , 37F
08/09 02:45, 37F
→
08/09 02:45, , 38F
08/09 02:45, 38F
→
08/09 02:46, , 39F
08/09 02:46, 39F
→
08/09 02:46, , 40F
08/09 02:46, 40F
→
08/09 02:48, , 41F
08/09 02:48, 41F
→
08/09 02:48, , 42F
08/09 02:48, 42F
→
08/09 02:48, , 43F
08/09 02:48, 43F
→
08/09 02:49, , 44F
08/09 02:49, 44F
→
08/09 02:49, , 45F
08/09 02:49, 45F
推
08/09 02:51, , 46F
08/09 02:51, 46F
→
08/09 02:51, , 47F
08/09 02:51, 47F
→
08/09 02:51, , 48F
08/09 02:51, 48F
→
08/09 07:04, , 49F
08/09 07:04, 49F
→
08/09 07:05, , 50F
08/09 07:05, 50F
→
08/09 07:05, , 51F
08/09 07:05, 51F
推
08/09 17:36, , 52F
08/09 17:36, 52F
推
08/09 17:44, , 53F
08/09 17:44, 53F
-------------------------------------------
這里說的不就是貴陽和臺北比硬體?
原po問的不就是繁華度?
※ 編輯: esolve (151.33.124.146), 08/09/2014 21:18:56
推
08/09 22:06, , 54F
08/09 22:06, 54F
推
08/09 22:17, , 55F
08/09 22:17, 55F
→
08/09 22:17, , 56F
08/09 22:17, 56F
→
08/09 22:18, , 57F
08/09 22:18, 57F
→
08/09 22:18, , 58F
08/09 22:18, 58F
→
08/09 22:19, , 59F
08/09 22:19, 59F
→
08/09 22:20, , 60F
08/09 22:20, 60F
推
08/09 22:23, , 61F
08/09 22:23, 61F
推
08/09 22:25, , 62F
08/09 22:25, 62F
→
08/09 22:25, , 63F
08/09 22:25, 63F
推
08/09 22:41, , 64F
08/09 22:41, 64F
→
08/10 10:48, , 65F
08/10 10:48, 65F
→
08/10 10:49, , 66F
08/10 10:49, 66F
→
08/10 10:51, , 67F
08/10 10:51, 67F
→
08/10 10:57, , 68F
08/10 10:57, 68F
→
08/10 10:59, , 69F
08/10 10:59, 69F
→
08/10 11:01, , 70F
08/10 11:01, 70F
→
08/10 11:03, , 71F
08/10 11:03, 71F
→
08/10 11:05, , 72F
08/10 11:05, 72F
推
08/10 11:08, , 73F
08/10 11:08, 73F
→
08/10 11:08, , 74F
08/10 11:08, 74F
→
08/10 11:08, , 75F
08/10 11:08, 75F
→
08/10 11:09, , 76F
08/10 11:09, 76F
→
08/10 11:10, , 77F
08/10 11:10, 77F
→
08/10 11:12, , 78F
08/10 11:12, 78F
→
08/10 11:14, , 79F
08/10 11:14, 79F
→
08/10 11:15, , 80F
08/10 11:15, 80F
→
08/10 11:21, , 81F
08/10 11:21, 81F
推
08/10 13:05, , 82F
08/10 13:05, 82F
→
08/10 13:06, , 83F
08/10 13:06, 83F
推
08/10 13:11, , 84F
08/10 13:11, 84F
→
08/10 13:12, , 85F
08/10 13:12, 85F
噓
08/10 13:24, , 86F
08/10 13:24, 86F
噓
08/10 13:28, , 87F
08/10 13:28, 87F
噓
08/14 05:12, , 88F
08/14 05:12, 88F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
閒聊
8
74
閒聊
19
141
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 19 篇):
閒聊
7
106
閒聊
5
71
閒聊
13
84
閒聊
0
4
閒聊
1
10
閒聊
0
3
閒聊
0
3
閒聊
14
110
閒聊
1
8
閒聊
2
27