Re: [問題] JR到底該不該留
來點實際討論
看勇士的樣子,要解體也不太可能了
然,丟KI求win now 也不是一個好選項
KL也換不到更好的
以長期規劃來看,奪冠勢必要等勇士掛病號(不切實際)、解體(再等兩三年吧!到時LBJ已經待退嘍~)才有可能跨過去
然後又有些言論是丟誰誰誰來補強、薪資已卡死難補強、換年紀更大的根本是丟了未來...等言論
因此我大膽提出養兵2~3年的想法
把LBJ做主菜丟出去,換個強硬內線回來養,像是鉛筆、AD或是拿潛力無窮的字母哥,順便拿個幾張首輪回來
如此既能省稅又能拿簽選未來
再加上磨合完備、勇士拆夥、LBJ老化
兩三年後KI搭配換回來的年輕肉體勢必能衝擊聯盟
這樣才是長久之道,至於總冠?就給LBJ去到的球隊或青賽去跟勇士馬刺玩嘍~
個人淺見
有沒有需要質疑騎士體質不夠好啊?
有沒有需要質疑LBJ的自帶體系啊?
有沒有需要丟誰丟誰又不說能補到誰啊?
真心求解
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.137.28.216
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Cavaliers/M.1497436959.A.EBA.html
推
06/14 18:52, , 1F
06/14 18:52, 1F
→
06/14 18:55, , 2F
06/14 18:55, 2F
→
06/14 18:57, , 3F
06/14 18:57, 3F
→
06/14 18:58, , 4F
06/14 18:58, 4F
推
06/14 18:59, , 5F
06/14 18:59, 5F
推
06/14 19:03, , 6F
06/14 19:03, 6F
→
06/14 19:04, , 7F
06/14 19:04, 7F
噓
06/14 19:07, , 8F
06/14 19:07, 8F
推
06/14 19:07, , 9F
06/14 19:07, 9F
→
06/14 19:09, , 10F
06/14 19:09, 10F
→
06/14 19:09, , 11F
06/14 19:09, 11F
噓
06/14 19:16, , 12F
06/14 19:16, 12F
推
06/14 19:17, , 13F
06/14 19:17, 13F
→
06/14 19:17, , 14F
06/14 19:17, 14F
推
06/14 19:21, , 15F
06/14 19:21, 15F
推
06/14 19:38, , 16F
06/14 19:38, 16F
推
06/14 19:44, , 17F
06/14 19:44, 17F
→
06/14 19:45, , 18F
06/14 19:45, 18F
推
06/14 19:47, , 19F
06/14 19:47, 19F
推
06/14 19:47, , 20F
06/14 19:47, 20F
推
06/14 19:50, , 21F
06/14 19:50, 21F
推
06/14 19:50, , 22F
06/14 19:50, 22F
推
06/14 19:51, , 23F
06/14 19:51, 23F
→
06/14 19:51, , 24F
06/14 19:51, 24F
→
06/14 19:52, , 25F
06/14 19:52, 25F
→
06/14 19:53, , 26F
06/14 19:53, 26F
推
06/14 19:55, , 27F
06/14 19:55, 27F
→
06/14 19:58, , 28F
06/14 19:58, 28F
推
06/14 20:01, , 29F
06/14 20:01, 29F
推
06/14 20:07, , 30F
06/14 20:07, 30F
推
06/14 20:09, , 31F
06/14 20:09, 31F
→
06/14 20:09, , 32F
06/14 20:09, 32F
→
06/14 20:09, , 33F
06/14 20:09, 33F
→
06/14 20:09, , 34F
06/14 20:09, 34F
→
06/14 20:09, , 35F
06/14 20:09, 35F
→
06/14 20:09, , 36F
06/14 20:09, 36F
推
06/14 20:12, , 37F
06/14 20:12, 37F
→
06/14 20:18, , 38F
06/14 20:18, 38F
噓
06/14 20:21, , 39F
06/14 20:21, 39F
噓
06/14 20:22, , 40F
06/14 20:22, 40F
→
06/14 20:24, , 41F
06/14 20:24, 41F
→
06/14 20:24, , 42F
06/14 20:24, 42F
→
06/14 20:24, , 43F
06/14 20:24, 43F
→
06/14 20:24, , 44F
06/14 20:24, 44F
→
06/14 20:24, , 45F
06/14 20:24, 45F
→
06/14 20:25, , 46F
06/14 20:25, 46F
→
06/14 20:25, , 47F
06/14 20:25, 47F
推
06/14 20:27, , 48F
06/14 20:27, 48F
推
06/14 21:09, , 49F
06/14 21:09, 49F
推
06/14 21:10, , 50F
06/14 21:10, 50F
推
06/14 21:18, , 51F
06/14 21:18, 51F
推
06/14 21:34, , 52F
06/14 21:34, 52F
推
06/14 21:57, , 53F
06/14 21:57, 53F
推
06/14 21:59, , 54F
06/14 21:59, 54F
→
06/14 22:00, , 55F
06/14 22:00, 55F
推
06/14 22:02, , 56F
06/14 22:02, 56F
→
06/14 22:02, , 57F
06/14 22:02, 57F
→
06/14 22:03, , 58F
06/14 22:03, 58F
推
06/14 22:05, , 59F
06/14 22:05, 59F
推
06/14 22:35, , 60F
06/14 22:35, 60F
推
06/14 23:21, , 61F
06/14 23:21, 61F
推
06/14 23:43, , 62F
06/14 23:43, 62F
→
06/14 23:45, , 63F
06/14 23:45, 63F
推
06/15 00:08, , 64F
06/15 00:08, 64F
推
06/15 00:15, , 65F
06/15 00:15, 65F
→
06/15 01:48, , 66F
06/15 01:48, 66F
→
06/15 04:09, , 67F
06/15 04:09, 67F
→
06/15 04:09, , 68F
06/15 04:09, 68F
噓
06/15 07:05, , 69F
06/15 07:05, 69F
噓
06/17 11:29, , 70F
06/17 11:29, 70F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
問題
14
31
完整討論串 (本文為第 8 之 17 篇):
問題
51
101
問題
33
74
問題
13
50
問題
16
25
問題
45
131
問題
11
47
問題
26
70
問題
14
31
問題
9
29