Re: [iwin] 衛福部3/21會議 確定不直播
想借這串問一下,本來想說寫篇英文文章發到Reddit之類的論壇看能不能鬧更大一點(?)
結果寫完了想到自己其實也不常混歐美論壇不太懂那邊生態,所以不知道到底該發去哪裡才
好XDD 有版友能給點建議嗎?
附上寫好的文章
Taiwanese people's freedom of reading/watching virtual works is threatened
The government of Taiwan (R.O.C.) is planning on releasing a new policy. To expl
ain it, people who own, create, or spread virtual artworks might be subject to d
isproportionately harsh penalties (up to seven-year sentence) if the government
subjectively considers the art works to be inappropriate content, particularly t
hose depicting child pornography. The government claims that it is to decrease t
he rate for child prostitution to happen; however, the policy is completely ridi
culous in my opinion for the reasons below.
First and foremost, there is no clue that virtual artworks are connected to actu
al child prostitution. In fact, refer to the study carried out by the experts at
Sexologisk Klinik(*), virtual child pornography does not lead to real child pro
stitution. There is also a substantial body of research showing that violence is
not related to violent video games. Based on the facts, I believe there is a hi
gher chance that virtual artworks are not responsible for any real world crimes,
including child prostitution. For instance, Japan has the lowest reported rates
of sexual assault and child prostitution despite having a thriving virtual porn
industry, including virtual child pornography. Engagement with virtual artworks
may satisfy certain desires, potentially reducing the likelihood of harmful beh
aviors towards real individuals. Overall, it seems to me that virtual artworks d
o not result in real child prostitution. Given this point, declaring owning virt
ual artworks a crime would be absolutely inadequate.
Secondly, there are no REAL children being abused just because someone owns or c
reates virtual artworks, as long as the artworks are totally fictions. On the ot
her hand, the freedom of the owner or the creator would be severely harmed. Once
the law is implemented, rather than real criminals, individuals without crimina
l intent are punished. This is clearly beyond the scope of government authority.
Actually, perpetrators of child prostitution in Taiwan always tend to be given
lenient sentences (usually lower than four-year sentences), which incites great
anger among our citizens. I suppose it would be a better idea for the government
to deal with real-world child prostitutes rather than banning virtual artworks
that are not proven to be related.
Finally, whether the art works comply with the standard is totally decided by th
e government, regardless of the background or the character set of the works. Wi
thout any criteria, the policy will undoubtedly become the tool for the governme
nt to control the freedom of speech. For example, if an active user on a forum o
pposes an inappropriate policy the government wants to promulgate, which upsets
the government, then the government would be able to sue the user because the us
er has posted a picture of a child, which does not even have to be erotic in pub
lic view. This will gradually silence all the opinions against the government, a
nd severely undermine freedom of speech in the long term.
Despite all of the unjustified aspects of the policy, the government will still
hold a meeting to impose stricter regulations on virtual artworks on 21st, March
. Moreover, the whole meeting would be held privately, making all of us afraid t
hat the meeting will be rigged. That is why I write down and post this article.
I hope that we can supervise the government together, preventing it from going f
urther on the road of dictatorship.
Here are some of the Taiwanese people’s responses to this incident.
ACGN creator's rights promotion association: https://www.facebook.com/ACGNCRPA/?
paipv=0&eav=AfbiMYSvAHueldor5H6Vbpu0kHv3Dn5gimkLEjGKmL9i1LNGBTR4UpBiTUcVzTbYvVk&
_rdr
ACGN creator’s issues forum: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cuqokjptclQ&t=2s&a
b_channel=%E5%8B%95%E6%BC%AB%E5%B7%A5%E6%9C%83
* refer to https://cbldf.org/2012/07/danish-report-discredits-link-between-cart
oons-and-child-sex-abuse/
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.200.12.122 (臺灣)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1710604247.A.235.html
推
03/16 23:52,
1月前
, 1F
03/16 23:52, 1F
推
03/16 23:52,
1月前
, 2F
03/16 23:52, 2F
→
03/16 23:54,
1月前
, 3F
03/16 23:54, 3F
→
03/16 23:54,
1月前
, 4F
03/16 23:54, 4F
推
03/16 23:54,
1月前
, 5F
03/16 23:54, 5F
推
03/16 23:55,
1月前
, 6F
03/16 23:55, 6F
→
03/16 23:56,
1月前
, 7F
03/16 23:56, 7F
→
03/16 23:56,
1月前
, 8F
03/16 23:56, 8F
→
03/16 23:56,
1月前
, 9F
03/16 23:56, 9F
→
03/16 23:57,
1月前
, 10F
03/16 23:57, 10F
推
03/16 23:57,
1月前
, 11F
03/16 23:57, 11F
推
03/16 23:59,
1月前
, 12F
03/16 23:59, 12F
→
03/17 00:00,
1月前
, 13F
03/17 00:00, 13F
→
03/17 00:02,
1月前
, 14F
03/17 00:02, 14F
→
03/17 00:02,
1月前
, 15F
03/17 00:02, 15F
推
03/17 00:03,
1月前
, 16F
03/17 00:03, 16F
→
03/17 00:07,
1月前
, 17F
03/17 00:07, 17F
→
03/17 00:07,
1月前
, 18F
03/17 00:07, 18F
→
03/17 00:07,
1月前
, 19F
03/17 00:07, 19F
推
03/17 00:13,
1月前
, 20F
03/17 00:13, 20F
→
03/17 00:13,
1月前
, 21F
03/17 00:13, 21F
→
03/17 00:13,
1月前
, 22F
03/17 00:13, 22F
噓
03/17 00:17,
1月前
, 23F
03/17 00:17, 23F
→
03/17 00:18,
1月前
, 24F
03/17 00:18, 24F
推
03/17 00:38,
1月前
, 25F
03/17 00:38, 25F
→
03/17 00:41,
1月前
, 26F
03/17 00:41, 26F
推
03/17 00:48,
1月前
, 27F
03/17 00:48, 27F
噓
03/17 00:53,
1月前
, 28F
03/17 00:53, 28F
推
03/17 01:31,
1月前
, 29F
03/17 01:31, 29F
推
03/17 01:45,
1月前
, 30F
03/17 01:45, 30F
推
03/17 01:53,
1月前
, 31F
03/17 01:53, 31F
推
03/17 01:55,
1月前
, 32F
03/17 01:55, 32F
→
03/17 01:55,
1月前
, 33F
03/17 01:55, 33F
→
03/17 01:57,
1月前
, 34F
03/17 01:57, 34F
→
03/17 01:57,
1月前
, 35F
03/17 01:57, 35F
→
03/17 01:57,
1月前
, 36F
03/17 01:57, 36F
→
03/17 01:57,
1月前
, 37F
03/17 01:57, 37F
推
03/17 02:02,
1月前
, 38F
03/17 02:02, 38F
推
03/17 02:03,
1月前
, 39F
03/17 02:03, 39F
→
03/17 02:03,
1月前
, 40F
03/17 02:03, 40F
→
03/17 02:09,
1月前
, 41F
03/17 02:09, 41F
→
03/17 02:09,
1月前
, 42F
03/17 02:09, 42F
→
03/17 02:11,
1月前
, 43F
03/17 02:11, 43F
推
03/17 02:11,
1月前
, 44F
03/17 02:11, 44F
→
03/17 02:11,
1月前
, 45F
03/17 02:11, 45F
→
03/17 02:13,
1月前
, 46F
03/17 02:13, 46F
→
03/17 02:15,
1月前
, 47F
03/17 02:15, 47F
→
03/17 02:15,
1月前
, 48F
03/17 02:15, 48F
→
03/17 02:15,
1月前
, 49F
03/17 02:15, 49F
噓
03/17 04:36,
1月前
, 50F
03/17 04:36, 50F
推
03/17 06:59,
1月前
, 51F
03/17 06:59, 51F
→
03/17 06:59,
1月前
, 52F
03/17 06:59, 52F
推
03/17 08:19,
1月前
, 53F
03/17 08:19, 53F
→
03/17 08:36,
1月前
, 54F
03/17 08:36, 54F
噓
03/17 08:40,
1月前
, 55F
03/17 08:40, 55F
→
03/17 09:01,
1月前
, 56F
03/17 09:01, 56F
→
03/17 09:01,
1月前
, 57F
03/17 09:01, 57F
推
03/17 09:22,
1月前
, 58F
03/17 09:22, 58F
→
03/17 09:22,
1月前
, 59F
03/17 09:22, 59F
→
03/17 09:22,
1月前
, 60F
03/17 09:22, 60F
推
03/17 09:29,
1月前
, 61F
03/17 09:29, 61F
→
03/17 09:29,
1月前
, 62F
03/17 09:29, 62F
→
03/17 09:29,
1月前
, 63F
03/17 09:29, 63F
→
03/17 09:29,
1月前
, 64F
03/17 09:29, 64F
→
03/17 09:29,
1月前
, 65F
03/17 09:29, 65F
→
03/17 09:29,
1月前
, 66F
03/17 09:29, 66F
→
03/17 09:29,
1月前
, 67F
03/17 09:29, 67F
→
03/17 09:29,
1月前
, 68F
03/17 09:29, 68F
推
03/17 09:34,
1月前
, 69F
03/17 09:34, 69F
→
03/17 09:37,
1月前
, 70F
03/17 09:37, 70F
→
03/17 09:37,
1月前
, 71F
03/17 09:37, 71F
→
03/17 09:37,
1月前
, 72F
03/17 09:37, 72F
→
03/17 09:37,
1月前
, 73F
03/17 09:37, 73F
→
03/17 09:37,
1月前
, 74F
03/17 09:37, 74F
→
03/17 09:38,
1月前
, 75F
03/17 09:38, 75F
→
03/17 09:38,
1月前
, 76F
03/17 09:38, 76F
推
03/17 09:44,
1月前
, 77F
03/17 09:44, 77F
→
03/17 09:44,
1月前
, 78F
03/17 09:44, 78F
→
03/17 09:44,
1月前
, 79F
03/17 09:44, 79F
→
03/17 09:44,
1月前
, 80F
03/17 09:44, 80F
→
03/17 09:44,
1月前
, 81F
03/17 09:44, 81F
→
03/17 09:44,
1月前
, 82F
03/17 09:44, 82F
推
03/17 10:53,
1月前
, 83F
03/17 10:53, 83F
→
03/17 10:53,
1月前
, 84F
03/17 10:53, 84F
→
03/17 20:13,
1月前
, 85F
03/17 20:13, 85F
→
03/17 20:13,
1月前
, 86F
03/17 20:13, 86F
→
03/17 20:13,
1月前
, 87F
03/17 20:13, 87F
噓
03/17 20:31,
1月前
, 88F
03/17 20:31, 88F
→
03/17 23:28,
1月前
, 89F
03/17 23:28, 89F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 12 之 15 篇):