[討論] 台灣沒有利害的漫畫家原因是?已回收
不知道下這種標題好不好
我想要問的是日本的漫畫家很多
也有很多受歡迎的漫畫
像是火影 海賊王 科南 XX王....等
那台灣怎麼都沒有那種受歡迎的漫畫呢?
就算台灣輸日本好了
日本有上百位漫畫家 台灣卻似乎一個都沒有
不是説要上面那些這麼受歡迎
可是連一些比較不主流但也不少人看的漫畫都沒有的原因是什麼
是因為繪畫技術輸人
還是題材呢 還是沒人推廣?
感覺繪畫技術應該不會差太多才對
以前的七龍珠 獵人 烏龍派出所 也不是走那種精美畫風的
真的不好 就模仿畫風?(以前一堆日本人模仿鳥山明)
那題材呢?
台灣人小說也不少 應該代表題材沒有問題
可是漫畫就幾乎完全沒有
至於推廣我就不清楚了
我想要問的事 大家有聽過的漫畫(不管主流非主流)幾乎都是日本人畫的
幾乎沒有台灣的 甚至連其他國家的都很少見
請問有什麼原因嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 117.56.109.19
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1432887411.A.5AC.html
→
05/29 16:17, , 1F
05/29 16:17, 1F
→
05/29 16:17, , 2F
05/29 16:17, 2F
推
05/29 16:17, , 3F
05/29 16:17, 3F
→
05/29 16:18, , 4F
05/29 16:18, 4F
→
05/29 16:18, , 5F
05/29 16:18, 5F
推
05/29 16:19, , 6F
05/29 16:19, 6F
推
05/29 16:19, , 7F
05/29 16:19, 7F
→
05/29 16:19, , 8F
05/29 16:19, 8F
→
05/29 16:20, , 9F
05/29 16:20, 9F
推
05/29 16:20, , 10F
05/29 16:20, 10F
→
05/29 16:20, , 11F
05/29 16:20, 11F
推
05/29 16:20, , 12F
05/29 16:20, 12F
推
05/29 16:21, , 13F
05/29 16:21, 13F
→
05/29 16:21, , 14F
05/29 16:21, 14F
推
05/29 16:21, , 15F
05/29 16:21, 15F
→
05/29 16:21, , 16F
05/29 16:21, 16F
推
05/29 16:21, , 17F
05/29 16:21, 17F
推
05/29 16:21, , 18F
05/29 16:21, 18F
→
05/29 16:21, , 19F
05/29 16:21, 19F
→
05/29 16:21, , 20F
05/29 16:21, 20F
推
05/29 16:23, , 21F
05/29 16:23, 21F
推
05/29 16:23, , 22F
05/29 16:23, 22F
→
05/29 16:23, , 23F
05/29 16:23, 23F
推
05/29 16:24, , 24F
05/29 16:24, 24F
推
05/29 16:24, , 25F
05/29 16:24, 25F
→
05/29 16:30, , 26F
05/29 16:30, 26F
→
05/29 16:32, , 27F
05/29 16:32, 27F
→
05/29 16:34, , 28F
05/29 16:34, 28F
→
05/29 16:34, , 29F
05/29 16:34, 29F
推
05/29 16:37, , 30F
05/29 16:37, 30F
→
05/29 16:38, , 31F
05/29 16:38, 31F
推
05/29 16:40, , 32F
05/29 16:40, 32F
推
05/29 16:42, , 33F
05/29 16:42, 33F
→
05/29 16:43, , 34F
05/29 16:43, 34F
推
05/29 16:44, , 35F
05/29 16:44, 35F
→
05/29 16:44, , 36F
05/29 16:44, 36F
→
05/29 16:45, , 37F
05/29 16:45, 37F
推
05/29 16:46, , 38F
05/29 16:46, 38F
推
05/29 16:46, , 39F
05/29 16:46, 39F
推
05/29 16:49, , 40F
05/29 16:49, 40F
推
05/29 16:50, , 41F
05/29 16:50, 41F
推
05/29 16:51, , 42F
05/29 16:51, 42F
推
05/29 16:53, , 43F
05/29 16:53, 43F
→
05/29 16:53, , 44F
05/29 16:53, 44F
→
05/29 16:53, , 45F
05/29 16:53, 45F
→
05/29 16:55, , 46F
05/29 16:55, 46F
推
05/29 16:59, , 47F
05/29 16:59, 47F
推
05/29 16:59, , 48F
05/29 16:59, 48F
推
05/29 17:00, , 49F
05/29 17:00, 49F
推
05/29 17:03, , 50F
05/29 17:03, 50F
→
05/29 17:03, , 51F
05/29 17:03, 51F
推
05/29 17:05, , 52F
05/29 17:05, 52F
推
05/29 17:10, , 53F
05/29 17:10, 53F
→
05/29 17:11, , 54F
05/29 17:11, 54F
推
05/29 17:18, , 55F
05/29 17:18, 55F
推
05/29 17:21, , 56F
05/29 17:21, 56F
推
05/29 17:26, , 57F
05/29 17:26, 57F
推
05/29 17:28, , 58F
05/29 17:28, 58F
→
05/29 17:31, , 59F
05/29 17:31, 59F
推
05/29 17:33, , 60F
05/29 17:33, 60F
→
05/29 17:35, , 61F
05/29 17:35, 61F
→
05/29 17:35, , 62F
05/29 17:35, 62F
推
05/29 17:36, , 63F
05/29 17:36, 63F
推
05/29 17:38, , 64F
05/29 17:38, 64F
→
05/29 17:38, , 65F
05/29 17:38, 65F
推
05/29 17:38, , 66F
05/29 17:38, 66F
推
05/29 17:54, , 67F
05/29 17:54, 67F
→
05/29 17:58, , 68F
05/29 17:58, 68F
推
05/29 18:03, , 69F
05/29 18:03, 69F
推
05/29 18:07, , 70F
05/29 18:07, 70F
推
05/29 18:10, , 71F
05/29 18:10, 71F
推
05/29 18:25, , 72F
05/29 18:25, 72F
→
05/29 18:26, , 73F
05/29 18:26, 73F
→
05/29 18:26, , 74F
05/29 18:26, 74F
推
05/29 18:27, , 75F
05/29 18:27, 75F
推
05/29 18:27, , 76F
05/29 18:27, 76F
→
05/29 19:13, , 77F
05/29 19:13, 77F
推
05/29 19:29, , 78F
05/29 19:29, 78F
推
05/29 19:32, , 79F
05/29 19:32, 79F
推
05/29 19:59, , 80F
05/29 19:59, 80F
推
05/29 21:04, , 81F
05/29 21:04, 81F
推
05/30 00:22, , 82F
05/30 00:22, 82F
推
05/30 00:26, , 83F
05/30 00:26, 83F
→
05/30 00:26, , 84F
05/30 00:26, 84F
推
05/30 00:48, , 85F
05/30 00:48, 85F
推
05/30 02:43, , 86F
05/30 02:43, 86F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):