Re: [紀錄] 勝投領先群
說實在的,要不是洋基有王建民,
我實在很懶得看他們的整場比賽,大不了就是上官網看比賽結果,
因為他們大部分的比賽都很難看,
不是打擊不連線,就是整隊便秘。
號稱大投手級的人物,表現也差強人意,
不要再說他們以前多強多殺,那是以前的事,
小弟未能躬逢其時,雖是小小的遺憾,但我想看的是現在的比賽!!
說真的,若以球員身價跟比賽結果對照的話,
洋基大概只有明星賽後那段時間,才有展現符合身價的實力吧。
那天翻了某雜誌,才知道大聯盟現任年薪最高的前十名,
洋基就佔了四名。很難想像這種球隊還得苟延殘喘地跟別人爭什麼外卡...
然後你看到某些球迷自我解嘲的說"ERA越高的投手,打洋基越有心得...科科",
或者是"我們洋基只對強隊有興趣!!"
講得好像很不屑贏一樣!!
這些自我安慰的話,我個人實在不以為然,表現爛就是爛,
要不是希望能多看小王幾場比賽,我倒很希望洋基隊早早打烊回家。
因為一個用金錢堆積出來的球隊,
實在很難展現運動比賽所強調的"不服輸"的精神,
每每看到一些年輕的球隊,用的都是一些不知名的球員,
但卻都能打敗這些號稱"頂尖"的明星球員,就覺得很爽!!
這才是運動"以小搏大""以弱勝強",最能激勵人心的部分,不是嗎?
或許洋基被稱為邪惡帝國的原因,
就是他玩的其實是一場用行銷堆積出來的明星秀,
跟運動什麼、或者團隊精神什麼的,反而沒多大關係了吧...
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 210.64.251.45
→
09/03 17:34, , 1F
09/03 17:34, 1F
推
09/03 17:35, , 2F
09/03 17:35, 2F
→
09/03 17:38, , 3F
09/03 17:38, 3F
推
09/03 17:39, , 4F
09/03 17:39, 4F
推
09/03 17:41, , 5F
09/03 17:41, 5F
→
09/03 17:41, , 6F
09/03 17:41, 6F
推
09/03 17:41, , 7F
09/03 17:41, 7F
→
09/03 17:44, , 8F
09/03 17:44, 8F
→
09/03 17:45, , 9F
09/03 17:45, 9F
推
09/03 17:45, , 10F
09/03 17:45, 10F
→
09/03 17:47, , 11F
09/03 17:47, 11F
推
09/03 17:48, , 12F
09/03 17:48, 12F
→
09/03 17:50, , 13F
09/03 17:50, 13F
推
09/03 17:50, , 14F
09/03 17:50, 14F
→
09/03 17:51, , 15F
09/03 17:51, 15F
→
09/03 17:51, , 16F
09/03 17:51, 16F
噓
09/03 17:51, , 17F
09/03 17:51, 17F
推
09/03 17:53, , 18F
09/03 17:53, 18F
推
09/03 18:10, , 19F
09/03 18:10, 19F
噓
09/03 18:10, , 20F
09/03 18:10, 20F
噓
09/03 18:11, , 21F
09/03 18:11, 21F
→
09/03 18:13, , 22F
09/03 18:13, 22F
噓
09/03 18:15, , 23F
09/03 18:15, 23F
噓
09/03 18:21, , 24F
09/03 18:21, 24F
噓
09/03 18:24, , 25F
09/03 18:24, 25F
→
09/03 18:24, , 26F
09/03 18:24, 26F
噓
09/03 18:25, , 27F
09/03 18:25, 27F
噓
09/03 18:30, , 28F
09/03 18:30, 28F
噓
09/03 18:38, , 29F
09/03 18:38, 29F
噓
09/03 18:51, , 30F
09/03 18:51, 30F
噓
09/03 19:02, , 31F
09/03 19:02, 31F
噓
09/03 19:07, , 32F
09/03 19:07, 32F
噓
09/03 19:09, , 33F
09/03 19:09, 33F
噓
09/03 19:13, , 34F
09/03 19:13, 34F
噓
09/03 19:23, , 35F
09/03 19:23, 35F
噓
09/03 19:27, , 36F
09/03 19:27, 36F
噓
09/03 19:29, , 37F
09/03 19:29, 37F
噓
09/03 19:39, , 38F
09/03 19:39, 38F
噓
09/03 19:57, , 39F
09/03 19:57, 39F
還有 37 則推文
→
09/04 00:18, , 77F
09/04 00:18, 77F
→
09/04 00:19, , 78F
09/04 00:19, 78F
推
09/04 00:36, , 79F
09/04 00:36, 79F
噓
09/04 00:38, , 80F
09/04 00:38, 80F
推
09/04 00:51, , 81F
09/04 00:51, 81F
推
09/04 00:52, , 82F
09/04 00:52, 82F
推
09/04 00:54, , 83F
09/04 00:54, 83F
推
09/04 01:06, , 84F
09/04 01:06, 84F
噓
09/04 02:01, , 85F
09/04 02:01, 85F
推
09/04 02:27, , 86F
09/04 02:27, 86F
推
09/04 03:03, , 87F
09/04 03:03, 87F
→
09/04 05:14, , 88F
09/04 05:14, 88F
噓
09/04 06:24, , 89F
09/04 06:24, 89F
噓
09/04 06:45, , 90F
09/04 06:45, 90F
噓
09/04 06:51, , 91F
09/04 06:51, 91F
噓
09/04 08:14, , 92F
09/04 08:14, 92F
推
09/04 09:17, , 93F
09/04 09:17, 93F
噓
09/04 09:49, , 94F
09/04 09:49, 94F
推
09/04 10:27, , 95F
09/04 10:27, 95F
→
09/04 10:28, , 96F
09/04 10:28, 96F
推
09/04 10:52, , 97F
09/04 10:52, 97F
→
09/04 10:56, , 98F
09/04 10:56, 98F
→
09/04 10:57, , 99F
09/04 10:57, 99F
→
09/04 10:59, , 100F
09/04 10:59, 100F
→
09/04 10:59, , 101F
09/04 10:59, 101F
→
09/04 11:00, , 102F
09/04 11:00, 102F
→
09/04 11:01, , 103F
09/04 11:01, 103F
→
09/04 11:02, , 104F
09/04 11:02, 104F
推
09/04 11:36, , 105F
09/04 11:36, 105F
噓
09/04 12:08, , 106F
09/04 12:08, 106F
噓
09/04 12:38, , 107F
09/04 12:38, 107F
推
09/04 12:48, , 108F
09/04 12:48, 108F
噓
09/04 13:08, , 109F
09/04 13:08, 109F
推
09/04 13:15, , 110F
09/04 13:15, 110F
噓
09/04 13:53, , 111F
09/04 13:53, 111F
推
09/04 16:18, , 112F
09/04 16:18, 112F
推
09/04 16:23, , 113F
09/04 16:23, 113F
推
09/04 16:46, , 114F
09/04 16:46, 114F
推
09/04 17:08, , 115F
09/04 17:08, 115F
推
09/06 01:10, , 116F
09/06 01:10, 116F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
紀錄
10
14
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 12 篇):
紀錄
62
95
紀錄
22
34
紀錄
12
24
紀錄
-18
116
紀錄
10
14
紀錄
15
36
紀錄
1
1
紀錄
9
14
紀錄
21
28
紀錄
10
18