[討論] 大家接受『末法時代』的說法嗎?
看板CFantasy作者chungrew (work hard, play hard)時間10年前 (2015/11/27 14:36)推噓36(36推 0噓 90→)留言126則, 36人參與討論串1/9 (看更多)
大家看小說 應該蠻常看到這樣的設定
上古時期,天地靈氣充裕,修練者多強多強....
然後碰到災厄、劇變,或者雖然什麼事都沒發生,但天地靈氣枯竭
所以修練者越來越弱 古老的傳承流失或是不再適用
武功也是一樣,越往近代越是沒落
金庸小說好像常被人用來舉例,說天龍八部很強、射鵰三部曲次之、笑傲江湖再次之
到了清代的書劍恩仇錄就弱了,連內功都練不出來,只能用外功擺個姿勢
但為什麼不是隨著歷史演進、經驗累積,結果越來越繁榮昌盛呢?
為什麼現代人一定比古人要來的差?
這樣的說法究竟從何而來?
而且不是一本書,很多書都喜歡這樣寫
資源、天地靈氣、天地元氣、魔法元素等隨著時光而枯竭,然後進入末法或末武時代
大家認同這樣的說法嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.119.157.180
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/CFantasy/M.1448606195.A.A45.html
※ 編輯: chungrew (140.119.157.180), 11/27/2015 14:37:27
推
11/27 14:39, , 1F
11/27 14:39, 1F
→
11/27 14:40, , 2F
11/27 14:40, 2F
→
11/27 14:40, , 3F
11/27 14:40, 3F
推
11/27 14:41, , 4F
11/27 14:41, 4F
→
11/27 14:41, , 5F
11/27 14:41, 5F
推
11/27 14:42, , 6F
11/27 14:42, 6F
→
11/27 14:42, , 7F
11/27 14:42, 7F
→
11/27 14:42, , 8F
11/27 14:42, 8F
→
11/27 14:42, , 9F
11/27 14:42, 9F
推
11/27 14:43, , 10F
11/27 14:43, 10F
→
11/27 14:48, , 11F
11/27 14:48, 11F
→
11/27 14:52, , 12F
11/27 14:52, 12F
推
11/27 14:55, , 13F
11/27 14:55, 13F
推
11/27 15:01, , 14F
11/27 15:01, 14F
推
11/27 15:06, , 15F
11/27 15:06, 15F
推
11/27 15:07, , 16F
11/27 15:07, 16F
→
11/27 15:07, , 17F
11/27 15:07, 17F
→
11/27 15:08, , 18F
11/27 15:08, 18F
→
11/27 15:08, , 19F
11/27 15:08, 19F
→
11/27 15:08, , 20F
11/27 15:08, 20F
→
11/27 15:08, , 21F
11/27 15:08, 21F
→
11/27 15:08, , 22F
11/27 15:08, 22F
推
11/27 15:37, , 23F
11/27 15:37, 23F
→
11/27 16:46, , 24F
11/27 16:46, 24F
→
11/27 16:47, , 25F
11/27 16:47, 25F
推
11/27 16:50, , 26F
11/27 16:50, 26F
推
11/27 17:53, , 27F
11/27 17:53, 27F
→
11/27 17:53, , 28F
11/27 17:53, 28F
推
11/27 17:59, , 29F
11/27 17:59, 29F
推
11/27 18:08, , 30F
11/27 18:08, 30F
推
11/27 18:16, , 31F
11/27 18:16, 31F
推
11/27 18:22, , 32F
11/27 18:22, 32F
→
11/27 18:22, , 33F
11/27 18:22, 33F
→
11/27 18:26, , 34F
11/27 18:26, 34F
→
11/27 18:27, , 35F
11/27 18:27, 35F
→
11/27 18:30, , 36F
11/27 18:30, 36F
→
11/27 18:31, , 37F
11/27 18:31, 37F
→
11/27 18:31, , 38F
11/27 18:31, 38F
→
11/27 18:34, , 39F
11/27 18:34, 39F
還有 47 則推文
→
11/28 00:52, , 87F
11/28 00:52, 87F
→
11/28 00:52, , 88F
11/28 00:52, 88F
→
11/28 00:53, , 89F
11/28 00:53, 89F
→
11/28 00:54, , 90F
11/28 00:54, 90F
→
11/28 00:54, , 91F
11/28 00:54, 91F
→
11/28 00:55, , 92F
11/28 00:55, 92F
推
11/28 00:59, , 93F
11/28 00:59, 93F
→
11/28 00:59, , 94F
11/28 00:59, 94F
→
11/28 01:05, , 95F
11/28 01:05, 95F
推
11/28 04:22, , 96F
11/28 04:22, 96F
→
11/28 05:24, , 97F
11/28 05:24, 97F
→
11/28 05:24, , 98F
11/28 05:24, 98F
→
11/28 05:25, , 99F
11/28 05:25, 99F
推
11/28 06:32, , 100F
11/28 06:32, 100F
→
11/28 06:32, , 101F
11/28 06:32, 101F
推
11/28 06:37, , 102F
11/28 06:37, 102F
→
11/28 09:32, , 103F
11/28 09:32, 103F
→
11/28 09:34, , 104F
11/28 09:34, 104F
→
11/28 09:37, , 105F
11/28 09:37, 105F
→
11/28 09:38, , 106F
11/28 09:38, 106F
→
11/28 10:09, , 107F
11/28 10:09, 107F
→
11/28 10:25, , 108F
11/28 10:25, 108F
推
11/28 16:20, , 109F
11/28 16:20, 109F
→
11/28 16:21, , 110F
11/28 16:21, 110F
→
11/28 16:22, , 111F
11/28 16:22, 111F
→
11/28 16:23, , 112F
11/28 16:23, 112F
→
11/28 17:35, , 113F
11/28 17:35, 113F
→
11/28 17:36, , 114F
11/28 17:36, 114F
→
11/28 17:41, , 115F
11/28 17:41, 115F
推
11/28 17:49, , 116F
11/28 17:49, 116F
→
11/28 17:50, , 117F
11/28 17:50, 117F
→
11/28 17:52, , 118F
11/28 17:52, 118F
→
11/28 17:53, , 119F
11/28 17:53, 119F
→
11/28 17:53, , 120F
11/28 17:53, 120F
→
11/28 17:55, , 121F
11/28 17:55, 121F
→
11/28 17:55, , 122F
11/28 17:55, 122F
→
11/28 17:56, , 123F
11/28 17:56, 123F
推
11/28 19:51, , 124F
11/28 19:51, 124F
→
11/29 01:52, , 125F
11/29 01:52, 125F
推
11/30 08:59, , 126F
11/30 08:59, 126F
討論串 (同標題文章)