[-Fx-] Fx 4,5,6,7 2011 送達
via: http://mcaf.ee/92457
剛剛看到這個RSS Feed,覺得一點驚訝,雖然我只用Opera
但偶爾也會看看Firefox的新聞。
---
Firefox's official roadmap has been updated, and boy are there some
interesting changes afoot. Most notably, Firefox 7 will ship in 2011. The
second biggy, and the main focus of Firefox development in 2011, is to make
sure there is no more than 50ms between any user interaction and feedback
from the browser.
官方說Firefox 7會在2011年釋出,而且Roadmap都出來了。
As far as feature sets go, this is what the roadmap looks like: Firefox 5
will absorb the Account Manager and F1 Simple Sharing add-ons to become
built-in features. It looks like Windows 7 64-bit will be officially
supported with FF5, too.
Firefox 5 開發重點在[帳號管理]和 F1 Simple Sharing 套件成為內建功能
(抱歉我沒用FX所以有些東西不知道怎麼翻)
Firefox 6 will have a focus on the Web applications framework, JavaScript
optimizations, and support for OS X 10.7. For Web applications, some missing
pieces of CSS3 and HTML5 will be added to Gecko, the rendering engine.
Firefox 6 著重在網路應用程式架構,JavaScript最佳化和支援 OS X 10.7。
Firefox 7's feature list is less clear. Electrolysis (splitting everything
into separate processes) and changes to XBL support are mentioned, but
nothing certain.
Firefox 7 功能清單比較不清楚。Electrolysis(分解任何東西成為獨立的處理程序)
還有提到支援 XBL。(這段我就更加不清楚了)
Overall, there's a big emphasis on responsiveness and "shining the primary UI
until it gleams."
It'll definitely be interesting to see how Mozilla transitions to a new
release cycle -- and it'll definitely mean a lot more Firefox-related news,
too!
---
一開始看到標題時感覺是「難道Firefox要學恐龍妹」不過看到每個版本都有重點的
開發項目又覺得不像。不過這要激進的開發計畫是不是Mozilla想宣示:
不要看我年輕,我發展也是可以很快的
我是希望Firefox正常開發就好,沒必要學恐龍拿開發週期來當版本號
不過以我對Firefox的開發和使用者的言行來看,這個海口跳票的機會恐怕比較高
2011...我覺得要不要多加個1到2年,只能說Firefox的使用者們辛苦了
--
◆ ◆◆◆◆◆
◆ ◆ [t7度空間]
◆◆◆◆◆ ◆ http://t7yang.blogspot.com
◆ ◆ 一個屬於我的創作空間
◆ ◆
◆◆ ◆
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.113.230.27
推
02/08 04:29, , 1F
02/08 04:29, 1F
→
02/08 07:02, , 2F
02/08 07:02, 2F
→
02/08 07:04, , 3F
02/08 07:04, 3F
→
02/08 07:05, , 4F
02/08 07:05, 4F
→
02/08 07:10, , 5F
02/08 07:10, 5F
→
02/08 10:06, , 6F
02/08 10:06, 6F
→
02/08 10:06, , 7F
02/08 10:06, 7F
→
02/08 10:30, , 8F
02/08 10:30, 8F
→
02/08 10:30, , 9F
02/08 10:30, 9F
推
02/08 10:53, , 10F
02/08 10:53, 10F
推
02/08 11:51, , 11F
02/08 11:51, 11F
推
02/08 13:04, , 12F
02/08 13:04, 12F
→
02/08 13:20, , 13F
02/08 13:20, 13F
→
02/08 16:37, , 14F
02/08 16:37, 14F
推
02/08 17:17, , 15F
02/08 17:17, 15F
推
02/08 22:39, , 16F
02/08 22:39, 16F
→
02/08 23:24, , 17F
02/08 23:24, 17F
推
02/09 00:25, , 18F
02/09 00:25, 18F
推
02/09 11:06, , 19F
02/09 11:06, 19F
推
02/09 12:47, , 20F
02/09 12:47, 20F
推
02/10 04:32, , 21F
02/10 04:32, 21F
推
02/10 14:31, , 22F
02/10 14:31, 22F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):