Re: [討論] 關於吳宗峻
※ 引述《abcd40116 (Cueto念做__頭)》之銘言:
: 最近酷寒戰士 愛將論
: 討論的沸沸揚揚
: 但今年黑峻的狀況
: 就是比前幾年好上不少
: 但出場數不是很多
: 還被定位為代打
: 讓很多人無言
: 矛頭指向守備野球的葉總
: 但有個很奇怪的地方
: 是真的剛好今年狀況回來
: 還是說他真的痛痛
: 其實在洋教練時代
: 大威老馮當總教的時候
: 他的出賽數就不多
: 也很常被當第一代打人選
: 洋教總沒有愛將包袱了吧
: 而且那時候牛迷期待的就是球員異動
: 跟現在史總一樣
: 一二軍流動很大
: 除了火龍輝全以外
: 其實其他位置一直大搬風
: 但就是很少會有吳宗峻
: 問題在哪邊呢?
只能說,跟酸民認真就輸了,維尼最大的問題是守備.跟打擊一點關係也沒有
還有富邦本身的隊形問題.富邦本身就是只能LF限定的外野手實在太多.能打不能守的外野
手實在太多
今年季中還好有拿到PJ算是及時補上空缺
太多只能LF限定的外野手.教練本來就很難調度
一支球隊不需要那麼多個只能LF限定的外野手.LF是所有守備位置中最不重要的一個
現在維尼在一軍也是因為富邦現在傷兵滿營.如果全員健康,我認為維尼是不會在一軍的
除非他打得贏胡,胡跟維尼一樣也是只能LF限定.其他哪都不能守
但維尼有可能打打得贏胡嗎?個人認為不太可能,守備能力已經嚴重退化的火哥,因為不是LF
限定.他今年到現在為止還能拿到272個PA,而且打擊率還能保持在0.3的水準
維尼如果讓他場場先發.打擊率如果能維持在0.28~0.29就已經算不錯了
今年要說愛將.大概就只有林WW吧.攻守兩方都沒有一軍水準.但是居然在一軍拿了105PA
這種等級的拿到破百個PA.難怪這支球隊戰績會差
總之,如果是全員健康的富邦,外野手應該是RF PJ CF釣蝦 LF國輝 DH胡 萬用外野替補高
孝儀這5位
維尼.林WW.詠漢.以及年紀漸大+守備嚴重退化的火哥.都不應該出現在一軍名單中
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.239.242.138
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1505116332.A.EB1.html
→
09/11 15:52, , 1F
09/11 15:52, 1F
推
09/11 15:52, , 2F
09/11 15:52, 2F
推
09/11 15:53, , 3F
09/11 15:53, 3F
→
09/11 15:53, , 4F
09/11 15:53, 4F
推
09/11 15:54, , 5F
09/11 15:54, 5F
→
09/11 15:54, , 6F
09/11 15:54, 6F
※ 編輯: Allen524 (36.239.242.138), 09/11/2017 15:55:22
噓
09/11 15:55, , 7F
09/11 15:55, 7F
→
09/11 15:55, , 8F
09/11 15:55, 8F
→
09/11 15:55, , 9F
09/11 15:55, 9F
推
09/11 15:55, , 10F
09/11 15:55, 10F
→
09/11 15:55, , 11F
09/11 15:55, 11F
推
09/11 15:56, , 12F
09/11 15:56, 12F
噓
09/11 15:57, , 13F
09/11 15:57, 13F
噓
09/11 15:57, , 14F
09/11 15:57, 14F
推
09/11 15:57, , 15F
09/11 15:57, 15F
噓
09/11 15:57, , 16F
09/11 15:57, 16F
※ 編輯: Allen524 (36.239.242.138), 09/11/2017 15:58:20
推
09/11 15:58, , 17F
09/11 15:58, 17F
推
09/11 16:00, , 18F
09/11 16:00, 18F
→
09/11 16:00, , 19F
09/11 16:00, 19F
→
09/11 16:01, , 20F
09/11 16:01, 20F
推
09/11 16:03, , 21F
09/11 16:03, 21F
推
09/11 16:04, , 22F
09/11 16:04, 22F
推
09/11 16:04, , 23F
09/11 16:04, 23F
→
09/11 16:04, , 24F
09/11 16:04, 24F
推
09/11 16:04, , 25F
09/11 16:04, 25F
→
09/11 16:05, , 26F
09/11 16:05, 26F
推
09/11 16:12, , 27F
09/11 16:12, 27F
→
09/11 16:12, , 28F
09/11 16:12, 28F
推
09/11 16:15, , 29F
09/11 16:15, 29F
推
09/11 16:16, , 30F
09/11 16:16, 30F
推
09/11 16:18, , 31F
09/11 16:18, 31F
推
09/11 16:19, , 32F
09/11 16:19, 32F
推
09/11 16:20, , 33F
09/11 16:20, 33F
推
09/11 16:22, , 34F
09/11 16:22, 34F
噓
09/11 16:23, , 35F
09/11 16:23, 35F
推
09/11 16:30, , 36F
09/11 16:30, 36F
推
09/11 16:30, , 37F
09/11 16:30, 37F
推
09/11 16:35, , 38F
09/11 16:35, 38F
推
09/11 16:39, , 39F
09/11 16:39, 39F
→
09/11 16:40, , 40F
09/11 16:40, 40F
→
09/11 16:40, , 41F
09/11 16:40, 41F
→
09/11 16:41, , 42F
09/11 16:41, 42F
→
09/11 16:46, , 43F
09/11 16:46, 43F
推
09/11 16:46, , 44F
09/11 16:46, 44F
→
09/11 16:48, , 45F
09/11 16:48, 45F
推
09/11 16:54, , 46F
09/11 16:54, 46F
→
09/11 16:54, , 47F
09/11 16:54, 47F
→
09/11 16:55, , 48F
09/11 16:55, 48F
→
09/11 16:55, , 49F
09/11 16:55, 49F
推
09/11 17:01, , 50F
09/11 17:01, 50F
推
09/11 17:04, , 51F
09/11 17:04, 51F
→
09/11 17:05, , 52F
09/11 17:05, 52F
→
09/11 17:05, , 53F
09/11 17:05, 53F
→
09/11 17:06, , 54F
09/11 17:06, 54F
推
09/11 17:09, , 55F
09/11 17:09, 55F
推
09/11 17:11, , 56F
09/11 17:11, 56F
→
09/11 17:11, , 57F
09/11 17:11, 57F
噓
09/11 17:14, , 58F
09/11 17:14, 58F
→
09/11 17:18, , 59F
09/11 17:18, 59F
→
09/11 17:18, , 60F
09/11 17:18, 60F
噓
09/11 17:18, , 61F
09/11 17:18, 61F
推
09/11 17:24, , 62F
09/11 17:24, 62F
噓
09/11 17:45, , 63F
09/11 17:45, 63F
推
09/11 17:49, , 64F
09/11 17:49, 64F
推
09/11 17:57, , 65F
09/11 17:57, 65F
推
09/11 18:00, , 66F
09/11 18:00, 66F
噓
09/11 18:02, , 67F
09/11 18:02, 67F
噓
09/11 18:03, , 68F
09/11 18:03, 68F
→
09/11 18:07, , 69F
09/11 18:07, 69F
推
09/11 18:11, , 70F
09/11 18:11, 70F
→
09/11 18:12, , 71F
09/11 18:12, 71F
推
09/11 18:15, , 72F
09/11 18:15, 72F
噓
09/11 18:19, , 73F
09/11 18:19, 73F
噓
09/11 18:22, , 74F
09/11 18:22, 74F
推
09/11 18:45, , 75F
09/11 18:45, 75F
推
09/11 18:59, , 76F
09/11 18:59, 76F
→
09/11 19:00, , 77F
09/11 19:00, 77F
推
09/11 19:01, , 78F
09/11 19:01, 78F
噓
09/11 19:15, , 79F
09/11 19:15, 79F
→
09/11 19:22, , 80F
09/11 19:22, 80F
推
09/11 20:40, , 81F
09/11 20:40, 81F
→
09/11 20:41, , 82F
09/11 20:41, 82F
推
09/11 20:42, , 83F
09/11 20:42, 83F
→
09/11 21:52, , 84F
09/11 21:52, 84F
噓
09/11 23:10, , 85F
09/11 23:10, 85F
噓
09/12 09:53, , 86F
09/12 09:53, 86F
噓
09/12 12:44, , 87F
09/12 12:44, 87F
推
09/12 18:19, , 88F
09/12 18:19, 88F
推
09/12 18:20, , 89F
09/12 18:20, 89F
→
09/12 18:24, , 90F
09/12 18:24, 90F
推
09/12 18:25, , 91F
09/12 18:25, 91F
推
09/12 19:01, , 92F
09/12 19:01, 92F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
討論
-3
23
以下文章回應了本文:
討論
-5
13
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 5 篇):
討論
-5
13
討論
5
11
討論
28
92
討論
11
54
討論
-3
23