[討論]台灣是不是敗在打球人口基數太少?已回收
幹,敗因就是沒選手可用,臺灣現在的實力現在只能撐前七局,一直爆在八九局或延長賽
,媽的 ,政府真的有心搞好棒球,先趕快把國中小的PU跑道全挖掉,全台先增建10,000
簡易球場吧,不然打球人口基數這麼少,怎麼挑到更棒的選手!! 一再輸球,真的很不爽
,別國都在進步,我們臺灣還在向下沉淪,拜託先把臺灣基層棒球搞起來好嗎? DPP不要
在嘴巴說要檢討了,快點做事!!! 第一步先從廢掉棒邪開始!!!
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 223.136.207.157
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Baseball/M.1489070504.A.4E5.html
※ 編輯: a20050405 (223.136.207.157), 03/09/2017 22:42:51
推
03/09 22:42, , 1F
03/09 22:42, 1F
推
03/09 22:42, , 2F
03/09 22:42, 2F
推
03/09 22:42, , 3F
03/09 22:42, 3F
噓
03/09 22:42, , 4F
03/09 22:42, 4F
→
03/09 22:42, , 5F
03/09 22:42, 5F
推
03/09 22:42, , 6F
03/09 22:42, 6F
→
03/09 22:43, , 7F
03/09 22:43, 7F
→
03/09 22:43, , 8F
03/09 22:43, 8F
→
03/09 22:43, , 9F
03/09 22:43, 9F
推
03/09 22:43, , 10F
03/09 22:43, 10F
推
03/09 22:43, , 11F
03/09 22:43, 11F
推
03/09 22:43, , 12F
03/09 22:43, 12F
→
03/09 22:43, , 13F
03/09 22:43, 13F
→
03/09 22:43, , 14F
03/09 22:43, 14F
→
03/09 22:44, , 15F
03/09 22:44, 15F
→
03/09 22:44, , 16F
03/09 22:44, 16F
推
03/09 22:44, , 17F
03/09 22:44, 17F
推
03/09 22:44, , 18F
03/09 22:44, 18F
→
03/09 22:44, , 19F
03/09 22:44, 19F
→
03/09 22:44, , 20F
03/09 22:44, 20F
推
03/09 22:44, , 21F
03/09 22:44, 21F
推
03/09 22:44, , 22F
03/09 22:44, 22F
→
03/09 22:44, , 23F
03/09 22:44, 23F
→
03/09 22:44, , 24F
03/09 22:44, 24F
推
03/09 22:44, , 25F
03/09 22:44, 25F
→
03/09 22:44, , 26F
03/09 22:44, 26F
→
03/09 22:45, , 27F
03/09 22:45, 27F
→
03/09 22:45, , 28F
03/09 22:45, 28F
→
03/09 22:45, , 29F
03/09 22:45, 29F
→
03/09 22:45, , 30F
03/09 22:45, 30F
→
03/09 22:45, , 31F
03/09 22:45, 31F
推
03/09 22:46, , 32F
03/09 22:46, 32F
推
03/09 22:46, , 33F
03/09 22:46, 33F
推
03/09 22:46, , 34F
03/09 22:46, 34F
推
03/09 22:46, , 35F
03/09 22:46, 35F
推
03/09 22:46, , 36F
03/09 22:46, 36F
→
03/09 22:46, , 37F
03/09 22:46, 37F
→
03/09 22:46, , 38F
03/09 22:46, 38F
→
03/09 22:46, , 39F
03/09 22:46, 39F
還有 92 則推文
→
03/09 23:00, , 132F
03/09 23:00, 132F
→
03/09 23:00, , 133F
03/09 23:00, 133F
推
03/09 23:01, , 134F
03/09 23:01, 134F
推
03/09 23:01, , 135F
03/09 23:01, 135F
→
03/09 23:01, , 136F
03/09 23:01, 136F
→
03/09 23:01, , 137F
03/09 23:01, 137F
推
03/09 23:01, , 138F
03/09 23:01, 138F
→
03/09 23:01, , 139F
03/09 23:01, 139F
推
03/09 23:02, , 140F
03/09 23:02, 140F
→
03/09 23:02, , 141F
03/09 23:02, 141F
→
03/09 23:02, , 142F
03/09 23:02, 142F
→
03/09 23:03, , 143F
03/09 23:03, 143F
推
03/09 23:03, , 144F
03/09 23:03, 144F
→
03/09 23:04, , 145F
03/09 23:04, 145F
→
03/09 23:04, , 146F
03/09 23:04, 146F
→
03/09 23:05, , 147F
03/09 23:05, 147F
→
03/09 23:05, , 148F
03/09 23:05, 148F
→
03/09 23:05, , 149F
03/09 23:05, 149F
→
03/09 23:05, , 150F
03/09 23:05, 150F
推
03/09 23:07, , 151F
03/09 23:07, 151F
→
03/09 23:07, , 152F
03/09 23:07, 152F
→
03/09 23:07, , 153F
03/09 23:07, 153F
→
03/09 23:14, , 154F
03/09 23:14, 154F
推
03/09 23:17, , 155F
03/09 23:17, 155F
→
03/09 23:18, , 156F
03/09 23:18, 156F
→
03/09 23:21, , 157F
03/09 23:21, 157F
→
03/09 23:21, , 158F
03/09 23:21, 158F
推
03/09 23:22, , 159F
03/09 23:22, 159F
推
03/09 23:30, , 160F
03/09 23:30, 160F
→
03/09 23:57, , 161F
03/09 23:57, 161F
→
03/10 02:04, , 162F
03/10 02:04, 162F
推
03/11 08:25, , 163F
03/11 08:25, 163F
推
03/11 08:25, , 164F
03/11 08:25, 164F
推
03/11 08:26, , 165F
03/11 08:26, 165F
推
03/11 08:27, , 166F
03/11 08:27, 166F
推
03/11 08:28, , 167F
03/11 08:28, 167F
噓
03/11 11:14, , 168F
03/11 11:14, 168F
→
03/11 18:37, , 169F
03/11 18:37, 169F
推
03/11 19:29, , 170F
03/11 19:29, 170F
推
03/11 19:29, , 171F
03/11 19:29, 171F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 9 篇):