Re: [轉錄][情報] 阿同伯酸雲端：我們需要萊特希爾 …
※ 引述《Lindemann (工作真難找)》之銘言：
: 恕在這麼多優秀博士和博士後討論這個問題,希望鞭小力一點啦
: 我是有點覺得李家同教授這個論證是非常"不合邏輯的",無論是從歷史來看或是常理來看
: 首先Lighthill教授專長是流體力學,數學物理,即使他非常聰明,但人總是渺小的
: 我不知道Lighthill教授他是怎麼去證明這件事情,或是他在資工也是非常的專精?
: 但是任何非資訊這領域的專家應該無法對整個資訊界和外界做一個公正的評價吧
: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Lighthill
It is easy to find the Lighthill report and related information here:
http://www.chilton-computing.org.uk/inf/literature/reports
/lighthill_report/overview.htm
After reading it, it might help to find how he could reach the pessimistic
conclusion.
The future is notoriously difficult to predict, however, sometime we are
forced to do it for limit of resource. It does not really matter. Scientific
progress is often walking on the trails of previous mistakes.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 58.114.222.65
推
04/18 11:00, , 1F
04/18 11:00, 1F
推
04/18 14:16, , 2F
04/18 14:16, 2F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 6 之 13 篇)：