作者查詢 / uka123ily
作者 uka123ily 在 PTT [ W-Philosophy ] 看板的留言(推文), 共1328則
限定看板:W-Philosophy
看板排序:
全部gay8145Christianity6532PublicIssue3488GUNDAM2857Gossiping2596AfterPhD1637NTU1457W-Philosophy1328Master_D1225SENIORHIGH1142Education1139Policy1130PhD494TKU_Talk432LGBT_SEX426Tokusatsu421SRW316L_BoyMeetsGi268graduate204lesbian201textbook174MAC173IA169HumService152Teacher151MH148marriage127C_Chat121L_TalkandCha106Espannol103MobileComm75CCU_talk74Catholic61Channel_V59GossipPicket51medstudent47Ancient38About_Life36J-PopStation36JesusLove35feminine_sex30Falcom29SYSOP28C_ChatBM27Feminism27NCCU09_PHILO27Brethren26HSNU_114226movie26Buddhism25DragonQuest25FinalFantasy25SHENA-RINGO25haiku23Aviation22creditcard22iOS22SW_Job22transgender22Confucianism21FLAT_CLUB21NDS21NSwitch21TKU_CME96B19FJU18iPod18Seiya17DIGIMON16media-chaos15PSP-PSV15Sandy14EqualRights13CrossStrait12Macross12Militarylife12NCCU08_Ethno12nCoV201912sex12bi-sexual11BraveSaga11LAW11GreenParty10Marxism10RESIT10Sociology10TO-LesQu10ck-talk9model9PUBLICISS_PT9AU_Talk8KMT8LatinAmerica8PCSH91_3058pet8Salary8study8AC_In7AdvEduUK7book7cat7CSMU-CM-OP7KOU7medache7MEI-CHYI7SuperStarAve7Utada7Violation7Asexual6BookService6digitalk6HatePolitics6Health_Life6L_HappyLivin6LoL6TKU-Strategy6CSMU-MED975Ecophilia5JapanMovie5joke5junji-ITO5MCU_Talk5NCCU5NCCU08_HISTO5NewYork5ONE_PIECE5popmusic5PuzzleDragon5studyteacher5WeiLi-geo5CKKC3132334CMU_CM444D_Fin_Law_924EarthQuake264EarthQuake434EUREKA4Lawyer4learnyf4Monotheism4NHU_Talk4NSYSU_EE95-14Nurse4pighead4RIPE_gender4SCU_Talk4scu_transfer4Suckcomic4TamShui4Aboriginal3AGEC993Bank_Service3CHU3ck59th3063DPP3Examination3HSNU_11123HSNU_8203Japandrama3kochikame3NCCU09_MAENG3NCCU_SEED3NTNU-HISBK3PttHistory3rent-exp3studyabroad3THU_BA20003THU_Talk3Trans_Study3AboutBoards2Anti-ramp2ChildrensDay2cksh85th3012CSMU-MED932DirectSales2dlsh-7th-3032Drama2Employee2FTHS-1582FuMouDiscuss2Google2Joi2MRT2NCCU_CCSH2Nintendo2NTUGIPO_PNSL2NTUmed002NUK_AC982Olympics_ISG2PCSH_talk2Physics2psychedelico2Slayers2tattoo_ring2TNFSH98th2Tour-Manager2Transformers2TYSH50-3032WuLing46-3172AnimMovie1ArakawaCow1ASHS-93-li1Atheism1Bio-Job1Biology1Buddha1Cancer1CCU-GIE981Certificate1CFP1Cheer1CHING1civic_life1ck58th3111cksh79th011Cobras1CODE_GEASS1Conan1CPU_7711CS_TEACHER1CTSH97EXP1DiscoveryNGC1DistantLove1documentary1Doraemon1Drum1ESP1Evangelion1Finance1FineArt1FJU-ACCR941FJU-Stat95A1Folklore1GarbageCan1Gintama1GONZO1H-GAME1HarukiMuraka1HCSH_10th3121HCU1Holland1HSNU_10371HSNU_11461humanity1japanavgirls1JP_Entertain1juniorhigh1kawaii1Kids_Sucker1KingdomHuang1Kitty_Sanrio1kodomo1Kojima1KS93-3161KS94-3021KS94-3181KS95-3141KS96-3141KS98-3021LadyGaga1LightNovel1Lo-Sheng1London1LTK1MacShop1marvel1MetalGear1mknoheya1mobile-game1NCCU01_DIP1NCCU07_Ghis1NCCU_SSSH1NCHU-AE981NCHU-CE-SB1NCHUS1NetRumor1NKFUST1NTOU-MME-99B1NTOUEE981NTUOCGeo1NTUT_IPET4951NYUST98_FING1Ocean1Oceanography1Odoko-juku1P2PSoftWare1Patent1PCCU_Talk1PCman1PHS1PlayStation1PoliceRadio1PoliticLaw1politics1Pride1PT-961PublicAffair1PublicServan1Publish1Queer_drama1QueerHabit1Reptile1Rockman1Salesperson1San-Ying1Scout1SetMeUp1SFFamily1Shima-Kosaku1SHU-Gender951single1SK_SD_PL1SlamDunk1So-Edition1Sorry_Youth1SoulEater1SpongeBob1SSSH-16th-Fk1TaichungBun1Tainan1Taitung1TAS1TCFSH67TH101Tennis1Terry1TFSHS65th3131TFSHS65th3151TFSHS65th3201TFSHS67th3091TFSHS68th3021THEBACKHORN1THULAW1TNNUA-MUSEUM1TORIKO1TryingTimes1TSU1TW-language1UglyClub1USC1vetbasket1VISA1Vocaloid1WesternMusic1YMSC_94_3191Yup01-031Yup03-041Yup99-081YZU_CN99A1YZU_MBA971Z-Chen1ZenKwun1Zombie1<< 收起看板(350)
8F推:沒眼鏡也是一種眼鏡05/24 14:31
9F→:所謂的中立並不存在 只是相對位置而已05/24 14:31
11F推:不須證明中立才是草率05/24 16:32
12F→:要怎麼去論述一個立場是超脫價值的? 立場本身就有價值05/24 16:32
16F→:價值中立本身就無法定義了 要達到無法定義的有可能?05/24 19:41
22F推:你要說是比較複雜的一套價值觀系統也可以啦05/24 22:54
23F→:雖然方便理解,但就定義來說不是很精準就次05/24 22:54
24F→:我無法定義我自己,所以我根本無法到達自己阿05/24 22:55
31F→:你無法定義我怎麼知道真的是我在講話?05/25 00:27
32F→:這很簡單吧XD05/25 00:27
33F→:你不知道什麼是中立,也很難定義,怎麼去說自己中立05/25 00:28
39F推:所以你知道了吧 當你知道中立的時候 就不中立了05/25 01:48
8F推:我不太能理解他為什麼抓這東西出來,然後什麼都沒解釋05/23 23:16
29F推:哈維爾不是研究意識型態的 我不知道能拿來做什麼05/24 02:07
30F→:充其量就是哈維爾個人的批判觀點,需要詳細審視。05/24 02:08
31F推:我只能看出,充滿許多修辭,需要商榷的修辭。05/24 02:10
32F→:這篇的價值也不會是你談的。05/24 02:12
1F推:現在是玩修辭學就好了?05/23 14:13
4F推:這兩個都沒處理過是半斤八兩05/23 09:13
21F推:好離題,不離嗎05/22 13:47
23F推:既然離題也無法辯了,建議你換個標題重新出發05/22 14:21
12F推:西哲版可以發兩行文05/22 11:26
13F→:我也是今天才知道的05/22 11:26
14F→:我會建議去看社會主義05/22 11:27
1F推:我會認為以柏林的自由觀點會比古典觀點更能批判共產主義05/19 00:47
2F→:也就是從政治層面去理解批判會比從經濟層次來的能打點05/19 00:48
18F推:因為柏林就是再談論社會主義浪潮下的自由為何05/20 15:33
19F→:你的倆邊怪怪的05/20 15:35
53F推:你說政治解決,就因為是政治無法解決05/21 21:24
55F推:你從哪裡看出她這樣認為05/21 23:09
1F推:你的確錯很大,我本來就不認為你在論述共產主義05/18 10:44
2F→:你從頭到尾只是說 自由主義覺得共產主義不公平而已05/18 10:45
3F→:共產主義就不是以自利作為出發點05/18 10:46
4F→:那麼你論述回饋不公平就會打稻草人05/18 10:47
7F→:你的意思就是你由自由主義觀點覺得共產主義不公平05/18 13:26
10F推:你的論點就是自由主義論點阿05/18 14:30
8F→:共產主義當然是談馬克思阿 不然你要談誰?05/18 13:26
9F→:要談列寧或毛澤東就是另一回事<05/18 13:26
12F→:所以我問了 到底他所謂共產主義是甚麼?05/18 13:44
13F→:而去釐清馬克思所想像的共產主義是必須的05/18 13:45
14F→:因為沒有馬克思也沒有列寧跟毛澤東的再修正與詮釋05/18 13:46
15F→:而不管你要談誰,都要回到馬克思到底說了甚麼。05/18 13:46
16F→:並沒有說馬克思等於共產主義。05/18 13:50
20F→:問題馬克思說共產主義耶XD05/18 16:02
21F→:應該是說毛列到底算不算是共產主義的實踐者05/18 16:03
22F→:不過不管怎麼分,都不代表他這樣的是批判是合理的05/18 16:04
24F→:馬克思寫的共產黨宣言說到共產主義當然先檢視馬克思05/18 16:08
28F→:第二國際的時候馬克思早死了吧05/18 16:18
7F推:是付出分配的問題05/18 08:54