作者查詢 / shouri
作者 shouri 在 PTT [ GreenParty ] 看板的留言(推文), 共453則
限定看板：GreenParty
看板排序：
全部KMT3553politics2312DPP1868YAKYU1395Aviation719NEW_ROC680CrossStrait619TSU507GreenParty453Policy364SeibuLions348IA183MdnCNhistory142Gossiping101gallantry91swim74PresidentLi73HatePolitics71media-chaos42Golden-Award34K_baseball30Baseball29SwimWear28BayStars26YomiuriGIANT26OrixBuffalo25Ecophilia24NCCU_SEED21TigerBlue21Bus19CPBL19CMWang18FLAT_CLUB18L_SecretGard18Fighters17Education16HanshinTiger16Marines16Tigers16Adachi15ASIA-uni15TA_AN13Tokusatsu13Cobras12CSMU-HSA9612kochikame12Swallows12Chunichi11DummyHistory11TKU_EW94B11a-diane10Asia10CYCUEL95A10ESP10NY-Yankees10petwork10share10CSMU-MED959CYCU_MIS_93B9CYSH97Y3189GoldenEagles9NDMC-N579PCSH91_3059ADS8Carps8CSMU-D898Kids_Sucker8KS92-3138NKUTEE8Olympics_ISG8CareerPlan7CSMU-BS947FJU-Stat95A7NCCU07_Ghis7NCUT-IM7NeedFood7RedSox7TANAKA7THU_BA20007dlsh-7th-3036Football6Geography6JP_Entertain6Patent6SoftbankHawk6transgender6YP91-3096CGU_EE985CLHS-TALK5Dragons5KS97-3055MAJOR5NCU92Physics5NTHU_TM965NTUBSE-B-935Pharmacy5PHAT-MEN5USC5Violation5WuLing46-3175Buzz_Service4ChthoniC4ck58th3024EarthScience4Espannol4FJU-ACCR944HLHS_10thU4KS96-3104KS96-3144MartialArts4money4Monkeys4Nintendo4PH-sea4SSSH-13th3114visualband4XiangSheng4YP88-3094YP88-3104YP91-3054YP92-3094YP93-3064YP93-3084AprilSky3Baki3Catholic3ck-talk3ck56th3243cksh79th013cksh84th3033comm_and_RF3CPU_FA7313Delivery3FJU-BA93B3Hate3HCHS921043HisShark3HK-movie3HSHS3HSNU_11423HSNU_9363HsuMingchieh3KS90-3213KS91-3053License3NCCU08_EcoG3NCYU_AFL_963NDHU_ACC_4TH3NHLUE-EDU993NTOU-MME-99B3NTUE_Nse973NTULawHome3PDA3PeopleSeries3Pirates3PoliticLaw3PublicAffair3Road3scutran_city3specialman3THU-His893TuTsau3young-jiang3AaronKwok2CCF2ck52nd3012CSMU-MIS932CSMU-OSH2CTAD2Dodgers2Eagles2fastfood2FCU-INS93B2FHSH-89-3162Gary_chaw2GHIBLI2GsGirl2HSNU_9802JapanIdol2Korea2Kyoko2L_TalkandCha2Matsuzaka_182minoru2MishimaYukio2NCCU05_GIDS2NCCU07_EA2NDHU-dc962NTOU_TALK2NTOUEE982NTUniNews2NUK_AC982PttHistory2Realityshow2RockMetal2Sawajiri2SET2SlamDunk2SongYoonA2Sony-style2SouthPark2SRW2Stephen2TKU-Strategy2TKUMB-SB2TMU9432TPC_Police2TTU-talk2Utada2Warfare2WhiteEyes2wikibaseball2YZU_CN99A2YZUfinGrad952A-MEI1A-Rod1A-SI-95-1T1Aboriginal1About_Life1AC_In1Africa1AirForce1ASHS-93-li1ASHS-95RN1Asian-MLB1B96310XXX1B97305XXX1B97310XXX1BBSmovie1ccps1CD-R1ChemEng1CHU_ME92C1cksh85th3071CLVSC1ComeHere1CPBL_Retired1CPBL_veteran1Cross_Life1Cross_talk1CSMU-MED901CSMU-MED941CSMU-MEDSB1CSMU-MT961CSMU-MTSB1CSMU-Volley1CSMUshinyuan1CTSH923011CTSH963011CyberFormula1Cyndi1Digitalhome1Doraemon1DragonBall1Economics1Elephants1ENG_BASE1FIT1FJU-Laws941FJU_JCS111Fund1GameKing1Gintama1GIS1GTA1Guardians1GuardRookies1HCSH_10th3121HisSoccer1HOT_Game1HsinTien1HSNU_10101HSNU_10361HSNU_10661HSNU_10911HSNU_10981HSNU_11181HSNU_11251HSNU_9041HSNU_9481HSNU_9741Hunter1I-Lan1J-PopStation1JimmyLin1KingofPop1KOU1KS96-3051L_BoyMeetsGi1LCD1Left_Village1Linda1Lo-Sheng1LTK1Lun-mei1Marketing1MavisHsu1MCU_Talk1MiamiHeat1Mo-Musume1MP96-2T1Navigation1NCCU_Climb1NCHU-FS1001NCHU_CsHsnu1NCKU_CSIE931NCULG1NDMC-F81NDMC-M1061Nicholas1NIU-ECE94b1NPUST1NTHU-DSPMT111NTHU-DSPMT121NTHU_KAVALAN1NthuCs031NTNU_MathBmt1NTPU-CRIM951NTU-K61NTUT_EE490A1Ornithology1Paradox1PHS1Physics1Psy-Team1PSY_Baseball1pts1Ptt-Charity1R943220PT1Reds1RelayFiction1Reptile1RSSH91_3031Russian1SCU_ACC_96A1SCU_Japan96B1scu_transfer1SFFamily1Sijhih1sky1STS1TaichungCont1TAKESHI1tale1Tennis1TFSHS65th3061TKU_Aero_35A1Tsao1TTUcourse1TW-FirstClub1TWproducts1TY_Research1Urban_Plan1weiyin1Wikipedia1wind-god1Wrestle1X-Japan1Yanzi1YCChen1YiDA1YP90-3121Yulon1<< 收起看板(363)
8F推:把備載當作鐵板一塊，算出來的結果當然會是錯的。其實不同09/03 20:36
9F→:的能源，根本無法互相支援。09/03 20:36
8F推:核能發電主要是提供高耗能工業用電。台灣產業結構過06/18 11:23
9F→:於依賴高耗能產業，才是需要核電的主要原因。要求人06/18 11:24
10F→:民節電，可說毫無意義。06/18 11:24
15F推:我沒有反對你的意見啊。台灣本來就沒機會反核的。06/18 16:18
26F推:經濟零成長? 台灣會爆發大饑荒吧... 至於人口現在已06/21 12:56
27F→:經零成長嚕06/21 12:56
64F推:物價會不會因此上漲? 會, 整體的大趨勢是如此.06/24 22:16
1F→:當年賓士克萊斯勒一度合併03/29 12:53
55F推:不要被20幾%的備載能源誤導了 Gas Turbine這種東西是03/29 12:45
56F→:無法承擔工業電源的(說簡單點就是因為不耐操)03/29 12:45
57F→:綠黨當年以為Gas Turbine最乾淨 但可惜的是現在CO2和03/29 12:46
58F→:CH4都能毀滅世界03/29 12:46
59F→:要非核又不希望電價漲太多 不是不可能 就在台北港特03/29 12:47
60F→:定區蓋2個台中火力發電廠行了, 只是綠黨會不會繼續叫03/29 12:48
61F→:叫叫呢? 科科...03/29 12:49
62F→:最後再強調1次, 備載容量不是1+1=2, 核電勝火電就在03/29 12:50
63F→:停機檢修期程較長, 如果你玩全火家園, 備載容量不到03/29 12:51
64F→:30%, 一大修還是得限電的, 科科03/29 12:51
65F→:更何況玩全火家園, 什麼時候再來個購煤弊案全民買單03/29 12:52
66F→:也還不知道呢 科科03/29 12:52
67F→:還有火電廠爆了不用疏散? 居民不會得癌症? 不會禍延03/29 12:54
68F→:子孫? 科科科科科......03/29 12:55
75F推:我的主張本來就是蓋新的核電取代舊的核電，總之火電03/30 01:14
76F→:難以扛基載，這是技術限制問題。03/30 01:15
77F→:至於替代能源要扛基載...這在物理上就是不可能的03/30 01:16
129F推:10幾％是無可取代的。不要裝做看不懂我前面說的。04/02 23:07
139F→:我前面已經說過了，無可取代性是來自基載2字04/03 09:10
142F推:並不是所有國家都和我國一樣這麼依賴高耗能電子業04/04 17:20
143F→:全世界有12吋晶圓廠的國家有幾國？04/04 17:20
144F推:肯定比全世界有核能發電廠的國家少04/04 19:22
136F→:太陽能要達到核3的發電量 得花掉半個屏東縣的地03/29 15:03
8F推:現在的問題是綠黨把半衰期3萬年的東西和放射性低於自02/18 09:47
9F→:然背景輻射的東西混為一談，然後有意無意忽略現在討02/18 09:47
10F→:論的是後者。前者是重要戰略物資，所有權在美國手中02/18 09:48
12F→:我是沒差啊，在更強烈輻射環境下活了10幾年都沒事了02/19 23:04
2F推:你不知道維琪早就是正黑板大大了嗎01/20 11:35
6F→:顏色不對就噓啊，意外嗎？01/22 21:52
10F推:誰在擁抱誰啊？搞不清楚狀況。01/26 09:50
11F→:我在綠黨版寫文章以吐槽居多01/26 09:50
1F推:不過，媒體很多都是政黨花錢養的。10/09 15:57
2F→:這句話林正杰也說過。10/09 15:58
38F推:Anarchy? 那就得呼叫newid123了. 開放槍枝解決問題!07/20 12:49