作者查詢 / idolater
作者 idolater 在 PTT [ FineArt ] 看板的留言(推文), 共56則
限定看板:FineArt
看板排序:
全部Gossiping8186MysticWiz321HatePolitics304Swccyer256studyteacher205Militarylife201DummyHistory137Military113historia92MobileComm92DSLR78C_Chat77FuMouDiscuss65japanavgirls62Chan_Mou59FineArt56Beauty41Cheer32Sewing318words26Digital_Art25PC_Shopping24AllTogether23car23Native23Warfare22HCKuo20painting19joke18Teacher18TOEIC17Tokusatsu16Viator96Gang15WomenTalk15Steam14Viator14Viator93Chia14Viator97Chia14Viator97Yii14AC_In13DC_SALE13Doraemon13PublicIssue13BoardGame12Hsinchu11MARIAH11C_Question10GUNDAM10PttLogo10WorkinChina10HardwareSale9WarCraft9Baseball8FITNESS8H-GAME8Touhou8Viator90Wuh8ask7DIABLO7home-sale7L_TalkandCha7NBA_Film7Road_Running7SENIORHIGH7TigerBlue7Wargaming7AntiVirus6EZsoft6HOT_Game6IA6mobilesales6MuscleBeach6NDHU-His1006Old-Games6Oracles6photo-buy6PresidentLi6SD-GundamOL6Taitung6Architecture5Ayu5Boy-Girl5Eng-Class5Facebook5Gintama5Keelung5model5photo5Storage_Zone5TaichungBun5TuTsau5Britney4CFantasy4Design4equal_change4FCU_Talk4Flash4hardware4Lakers4Linux4movie4NewAge4Orl-Magic4PCSH91_3054PSP-PSV4Stock4Summer4TheSims4TW-history4Army-Sir3ArtCenter3ask-why3AskBoard3CATCH3CSMU-MED943CSMU-Volley3DPP3Ecophilia3gallantry3humanity3hypermall3KanColle3L_HappyLivin3MenTalk3NEW_ROC3NTU3NUU_Talk3Printer_scan3Salary3SAN3Shima-Kosaku3tabletennis3Tech_Job3VideoCard3Windows3a-diane2Android2Aquarium2Aquarius2Arknights2ASHS-94sin2Audiophile2biker2Browsers2Bundesliga2cat2CGI-Game2Chiayi2CPSHS10th3032CrossStrait2CSMU-OT902DC2DigitalMusic2e-shopping2ELT2FAPL2FLAT_CLUB2Gamesale2guitar2IME2Japandrama2Key_Mou_Pad2Leo2Life2Mabinogi2medstudent2Mind2Nantou2NDMC-D622NIHONGO2NUU_ID2ONE_PIECE2paranormal2PathofExile2PM2PokeMon2PublicHealth2PushDoll2Shu-Lin2ShuangHe2Soft_Job2Songs2Sony-style2stationery2StupidClown2TA_AN2Taoyuan2TezukaOsamu2Theater2ToS2WorldCup2AaronKwok1About_Life1AfterPhD1ai-photo1Ajax1Ancient1AngelPray1AT_PingPong1Atletico1BandPlayer1BASKET-RULES1BB_Online1Billiard1Bioindustry1Biotech1BloodType1book1Broad_Band1C_and_CPP1Cad_Cae1calligraphic1Car-rent1CareerLady1Catholic1Celtics1CGU_EE981Chi-Gong1China1ChineseMed1CJCU_HCA981CMWang1ComeHere1comm_and_RF1Couchsurfing1creditcard1Digitalhome1DNF1dog1Donate-Blood1DragonBall1e-coupon1EarthScience1Eason1EatToDie1egg-exchange1Electronics1Examination1FAIRYTAIL1fashion1FBaseball1FEZ1Filming1FishShrimp1FJU1FJU-Laws951FJU_JCS111Food1forsale1friends1FTV1GEPT1GossipPicket1graduate1GreenParty1haiku1hairdo1Hamster1happy1HCHS923131HCU1Headphone1Hearthstone1Hiking1hotspring1I-Lan1ID_Problem1Instant_Mess1iOS1Isayama1ItohMisaki1JamesWen1Japan_Travel1Jeremy_Lin1jersey1juniorhigh1K-Kawaguchi1Kaohsiung1kawaii1Kids_Sucker1Kindaichi_Q1KingdomHuang1KMT1Knicks1KTV1KUAS1LGBT_SEX1Lineage1Lions1Loan1LoL1love1LTK1MacShop1ManCity1MapleStory1Master_D1MayDay1MdnCNhistory1medache1media-chaos1MJ1MOD1MP1Mudran1Music-Sell1NBA1NCCU1NCCU08_HISTO1NCCU09_CHI1NCCU_CG1NCCU_Wine1nCoV20191NDHU-LS-TT1NDHU-LS-WV1Newcastle1NIU-ECE94b1NKFUST-CCE901NKMU1NSYSU1NSYSU-Chem991NTPU-ECONM961NTUST-DT95-11NTUST-ENG1Ocean1Oceanography1Oh-GREAT1Option1PACERS1Plant1PlayStation1PoleStar1Policy1PttLaw1puzzle1PuzzleDragon1Railway1RO1Sangokumusou1SCU_CIS-92A1SCU_Talk1sex1Singapore1Softball1SongShan1specialman1SRW1StoneAge1STU1Suckcomic1SuperBike1SuperHeroes1swim1Taipei1Taiwan3191TCFSH70th3211teeth_salon1Test1Theatre1THU-HIS971THU_Talk1TKU-Strategy1TNFSH98th1Tobacco1toberich1TSU1TY_Research1ukulele1Urban_Plan1UTAH-JAZZ1ValenciaCF1Virgo1Vocaloid1W-Philosophy1watch1Wine1XBOX1Yunlin1<< 收起看板(378)
1F推: 看過新一代撤展的時候嗎?設計師都超不環保的01/28 23:50
1F→: 但其實很多作品如果你沒有一些先備知識或是脈絡理解,你07/07 12:30
2F→: 很難知道他好或令人感動的點在哪07/07 12:30
3F→: 縮短文化時空差距的方法就是講解。07/07 12:31
106F→: 需要被解釋的作品絕對不是只有概念性藝術,例如清朝人看07/22 07:46
107F→: 西洋人像繪畫全部都是爛畫,因為有光影,陰陽臉,視角固07/22 07:46
108F→: 定。不符合他們的“直觀”;當時的西方人看中國水墨也是07/22 07:46
109F→: ,比例不寫實,色彩單調,骨架不正確。不符合西方人的“07/22 07:46
110F→: 直觀”。那麼您所說的直觀到底是哪一種概念?07/22 07:46
111F→: 又例如:素人藝術,創作者作畫是未受學院訓練,憑藉本能07/22 07:53
112F→: 和土法煉鋼方式製作出來,有人說他們的創作方式對創作者07/22 07:53
113F→: 很“直觀”,然而欣賞者呢?是否每人都能接受這種表現方07/22 07:53
114F→: 式?或者有些人要被導覽,解釋,才能欣賞這種藝術的獨特07/22 07:54
115F→: 之處?07/22 07:54
137F→: 我講的不是自己的看法,而是已經發生的事實,那你要怎麼07/23 23:16
138F→: 用你的說法去解釋這些事實,或者不解釋,那是你的自由。07/23 23:16
2F推: 一般後現代都會從1960或1980年後的藝術運動談起,之前的08/21 07:25
3F→: 都算精神類似的先聲08/21 07:25
5F→:誰能把我跨下的劍拔出來,誰就是未來的英格蘭王!09/09 00:35
4F→:不,你搞錯了,這跟藝術貶低與否無關,跟勞動價值有關12/17 21:07
5F→:台灣就是充斥太多這種心態,每個人當起老闆來都吃人夠夠12/17 21:09
6F→:看那24小時壓榨無休的外勞看護工,進而影響本勞工作機會12/17 21:12
7F→:一堆農民工人本來也應該不只值這個價的,是因為被菜蟲、12/17 21:17
8F→:資方播削到讓你覺得他們的待遇是正常的12/17 21:18
4F噓:您為什麼這麼著急呢? 真的想要就拿出夠誠意的報酬12/17 18:35
2F噓:沒版主拉,不能刪文12/06 23:25
3F噓:22k時薪都比這高12/06 23:27
1F→:沒書單嗎?06/27 08:44
29F推:王老師:姆....如果我把一個真正的漫畫家擺在威尼斯雙年展06/01 22:03
30F→:會場,不知道大家會有什麼反應?06/01 22:03
31F→:^^^^^^某老師06/01 22:09
1F→:不,很多人只在意有沒有色情,是不是藝術必不是他們關心05/15 23:34
2F→:的重點。排斥色情是中產階級的專利。05/15 23:38
3F→: 並05/15 23:38