Re: [問題] 全盛時期的蔣澎龍,在今日能世界前五嗎?消失
※ 引述《zkow (逍遙山水憶秋年)》之銘言:
: 感謝板友的分享,看完蔣澎龍2001年全盛期打劉國樑的影片
: 當時這個鬼之推擋真的是遇神殺神,遇魔殺魔
: 在國際舞台上,直拍選手的減少是因為技術的進步,使直拍選手越來越趨劣勢
: 倘若當年全盛期的蔣澎龍,以他的打法跟破壞力,放之今日,是否一樣能夠威揚呢?
: 我記得蔣澎龍選手晚期,還曾經跟岸川聖也打到第七局
: 鬼之推擋的打法,遇到今日的擰球技術,不知是否會被剋住
: 很好奇蔣澎龍的顛峰期若是在今日,將會是怎樣的情形
: 另外想請教板友,十幾年前以直拍打法訓練的小孩,後來遇到的瓶頸跟難關為何?
: 很想知道,謝謝
蔣澎龍為台灣桌球國手,身高(184公分)。
我也是看對戰劉國樑的影片
當年蔣的打法放到至今一樣會世界第三
這是2017卡達公開賽4強賽莊智淵VS馬龍
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulrzmxgeNNI
看了對戰內容
就算馬龍特別會擰球
蔣澎龍 的鬼之推擋不會給這麼多板
你擰球我加壓 在加壓
不是沒有勝算的機會
看多年桌球賽 失誤穩定性一直是我們的缺點
世界前十互有輸贏 需看當時比賽的狀況好不好
現在球員明顯結實了許多 現代化重量訓練不少
莊哥狀況一直保持的不錯 希望可以拼一面奧運獎牌
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.25.233.145
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/tabletennis/M.1504171155.A.392.html
→
08/31 17:58, , 1F
08/31 17:58, 1F
推
08/31 17:59, , 2F
08/31 17:59, 2F
推
08/31 18:02, , 3F
08/31 18:02, 3F
推
08/31 18:23, , 4F
08/31 18:23, 4F
推
08/31 18:39, , 5F
08/31 18:39, 5F
→
08/31 18:39, , 6F
08/31 18:39, 6F
→
08/31 18:48, , 7F
08/31 18:48, 7F
→
08/31 18:48, , 8F
08/31 18:48, 8F
→
08/31 19:26, , 9F
08/31 19:26, 9F
推
08/31 19:47, , 10F
08/31 19:47, 10F
→
08/31 19:48, , 11F
08/31 19:48, 11F
推
08/31 20:18, , 12F
08/31 20:18, 12F
→
08/31 20:18, , 13F
08/31 20:18, 13F
→
08/31 20:22, , 14F
08/31 20:22, 14F
→
08/31 20:22, , 15F
08/31 20:22, 15F
推
08/31 20:51, , 16F
08/31 20:51, 16F
推
08/31 20:55, , 17F
08/31 20:55, 17F
→
08/31 21:08, , 18F
08/31 21:08, 18F
推
08/31 22:15, , 19F
08/31 22:15, 19F
→
08/31 22:15, , 20F
08/31 22:15, 20F
→
08/31 22:15, , 21F
08/31 22:15, 21F
推
08/31 22:19, , 22F
08/31 22:19, 22F
推
08/31 23:01, , 23F
08/31 23:01, 23F
推
08/31 23:31, , 24F
08/31 23:31, 24F
推
09/01 00:00, , 25F
09/01 00:00, 25F
推
09/01 01:16, , 26F
09/01 01:16, 26F
推
09/01 02:00, , 27F
09/01 02:00, 27F
推
09/01 02:02, , 28F
09/01 02:02, 28F
→
09/01 02:03, , 29F
09/01 02:03, 29F
→
09/01 02:03, , 30F
09/01 02:03, 30F
→
09/01 02:04, , 31F
09/01 02:04, 31F
→
09/01 02:05, , 32F
09/01 02:05, 32F
→
09/01 02:06, , 33F
09/01 02:06, 33F
推
09/01 02:56, , 34F
09/01 02:56, 34F
推
09/01 10:52, , 35F
09/01 10:52, 35F
→
09/01 12:14, , 36F
09/01 12:14, 36F
推
09/01 12:43, , 37F
09/01 12:43, 37F
→
09/01 12:43, , 38F
09/01 12:43, 38F
→
09/01 12:43, , 39F
09/01 12:43, 39F
推
09/01 16:48, , 40F
09/01 16:48, 40F
推
09/01 22:29, , 41F
09/01 22:29, 41F
→
09/01 22:29, , 42F
09/01 22:29, 42F
推
09/02 09:45, , 43F
09/02 09:45, 43F
推
09/02 10:38, , 44F
09/02 10:38, 44F
→
09/02 10:38, , 45F
09/02 10:38, 45F
→
09/02 22:56, , 46F
09/02 22:56, 46F
→
09/02 22:57, , 47F
09/02 22:57, 47F
→
09/02 22:58, , 48F
09/02 22:58, 48F
→
09/02 22:59, , 49F
09/02 22:59, 49F
→
09/02 23:00, , 50F
09/02 23:00, 50F
→
09/02 23:02, , 51F
09/02 23:02, 51F
→
09/02 23:03, , 52F
09/02 23:03, 52F
推
09/03 02:41, , 53F
09/03 02:41, 53F
→
09/03 02:41, , 54F
09/03 02:41, 54F
→
09/03 02:41, , 55F
09/03 02:41, 55F
→
09/03 02:41, , 56F
09/03 02:41, 56F
→
09/03 02:41, , 57F
09/03 02:41, 57F
→
09/03 02:41, , 58F
09/03 02:41, 58F
推
09/03 02:53, , 59F
09/03 02:53, 59F
→
09/03 02:54, , 60F
09/03 02:54, 60F
→
09/03 02:55, , 61F
09/03 02:55, 61F
推
09/03 06:41, , 62F
09/03 06:41, 62F
→
09/03 06:41, , 63F
09/03 06:41, 63F
→
09/03 06:41, , 64F
09/03 06:41, 64F
→
09/03 06:41, , 65F
09/03 06:41, 65F
→
09/03 06:41, , 66F
09/03 06:41, 66F
→
09/03 06:41, , 67F
09/03 06:41, 67F
推
09/03 12:15, , 68F
09/03 12:15, 68F
→
09/03 12:15, , 69F
09/03 12:15, 69F
→
09/03 12:15, , 70F
09/03 12:15, 70F
推
09/03 12:22, , 71F
09/03 12:22, 71F
→
09/03 12:22, , 72F
09/03 12:22, 72F
→
09/03 12:22, , 73F
09/03 12:22, 73F
→
09/03 12:22, , 74F
09/03 12:22, 74F
→
09/03 12:22, , 75F
09/03 12:22, 75F
推
09/03 19:08, , 76F
09/03 19:08, 76F
→
09/03 19:08, , 77F
09/03 19:08, 77F
推
09/04 01:39, , 78F
09/04 01:39, 78F
→
09/04 01:40, , 79F
09/04 01:40, 79F
→
09/04 01:40, , 80F
09/04 01:40, 80F
→
09/04 01:40, , 81F
09/04 01:40, 81F
→
09/04 01:41, , 82F
09/04 01:41, 82F
推
09/04 02:23, , 83F
09/04 02:23, 83F
→
09/04 02:23, , 84F
09/04 02:23, 84F
→
09/04 02:23, , 85F
09/04 02:23, 85F
推
09/05 10:51, , 86F
09/05 10:51, 86F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 5 篇):