[討論] 仔細想想復仇者2奧創的計畫怪怪的
他把一塊土地往上升 當成隕石砸下來 要搞恐龍滅絕那一套
但是根據能量守恆定理 把那塊土拉上去的能量應該等於他掉下來釋放的能量
那他直接把推進器蘊含的能量拿來引爆或釋放不就好了
還是物理不是我這個看電影的想的這麼簡單?
有沒有物理高手分享一下看法 奧創是不是多此一舉?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.160.117.122
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/movie/M.1491737855.A.EBE.html
推
04/09 19:39, , 1F
04/09 19:39, 1F
推
04/09 19:39, , 2F
04/09 19:39, 2F
→
04/09 19:40, , 3F
04/09 19:40, 3F
→
04/09 19:40, , 4F
04/09 19:40, 4F
→
04/09 19:40, , 5F
04/09 19:40, 5F
推
04/09 19:42, , 6F
04/09 19:42, 6F
推
04/09 19:44, , 7F
04/09 19:44, 7F
→
04/09 19:47, , 8F
04/09 19:47, 8F
→
04/09 19:49, , 9F
04/09 19:49, 9F
推
04/09 19:54, , 10F
04/09 19:54, 10F
→
04/09 19:55, , 11F
04/09 19:55, 11F
→
04/09 19:55, , 12F
04/09 19:55, 12F
推
04/09 19:57, , 13F
04/09 19:57, 13F
→
04/09 19:58, , 14F
04/09 19:58, 14F
→
04/09 19:59, , 15F
04/09 19:59, 15F
→
04/09 20:00, , 16F
04/09 20:00, 16F
推
04/09 20:16, , 17F
04/09 20:16, 17F
→
04/09 20:26, , 18F
04/09 20:26, 18F
推
04/09 20:36, , 19F
04/09 20:36, 19F
→
04/09 20:40, , 20F
04/09 20:40, 20F
推
04/09 20:58, , 21F
04/09 20:58, 21F
推
04/09 21:04, , 22F
04/09 21:04, 22F
推
04/09 21:09, , 23F
04/09 21:09, 23F
推
04/09 21:10, , 24F
04/09 21:10, 24F
→
04/09 21:10, , 25F
04/09 21:10, 25F
→
04/09 21:10, , 26F
04/09 21:10, 26F
→
04/09 21:10, , 27F
04/09 21:10, 27F
→
04/09 21:12, , 28F
04/09 21:12, 28F
推
04/09 21:19, , 29F
04/09 21:19, 29F
噓
04/09 21:19, , 30F
04/09 21:19, 30F
→
04/09 21:19, , 31F
04/09 21:19, 31F
推
04/09 21:38, , 32F
04/09 21:38, 32F
推
04/09 21:38, , 33F
04/09 21:38, 33F
推
04/09 21:40, , 34F
04/09 21:40, 34F
→
04/09 21:41, , 35F
04/09 21:41, 35F
推
04/09 21:53, , 36F
04/09 21:53, 36F
推
04/09 21:59, , 37F
04/09 21:59, 37F
推
04/09 22:01, , 38F
04/09 22:01, 38F
→
04/09 22:10, , 39F
04/09 22:10, 39F
→
04/09 22:12, , 40F
04/09 22:12, 40F
→
04/09 22:12, , 41F
04/09 22:12, 41F
→
04/09 22:14, , 42F
04/09 22:14, 42F
→
04/09 22:14, , 43F
04/09 22:14, 43F
推
04/09 22:34, , 44F
04/09 22:34, 44F
推
04/09 22:42, , 45F
04/09 22:42, 45F
推
04/09 22:48, , 46F
04/09 22:48, 46F
→
04/09 22:49, , 47F
04/09 22:49, 47F
推
04/09 22:49, , 48F
04/09 22:49, 48F
推
04/09 22:54, , 49F
04/09 22:54, 49F
→
04/09 22:55, , 50F
04/09 22:55, 50F
推
04/09 23:01, , 51F
04/09 23:01, 51F
→
04/09 23:01, , 52F
04/09 23:01, 52F
→
04/09 23:02, , 53F
04/09 23:02, 53F
→
04/09 23:03, , 54F
04/09 23:03, 54F
推
04/09 23:41, , 55F
04/09 23:41, 55F
噓
04/10 00:21, , 56F
04/10 00:21, 56F
推
04/10 00:48, , 57F
04/10 00:48, 57F
推
04/10 01:14, , 58F
04/10 01:14, 58F
推
04/10 01:37, , 59F
04/10 01:37, 59F
推
04/10 01:53, , 60F
04/10 01:53, 60F
推
04/10 02:49, , 61F
04/10 02:49, 61F
推
04/10 03:12, , 62F
04/10 03:12, 62F
推
04/10 07:46, , 63F
04/10 07:46, 63F
→
04/10 07:46, , 64F
04/10 07:46, 64F
推
04/10 08:20, , 65F
04/10 08:20, 65F
→
04/10 08:26, , 66F
04/10 08:26, 66F
推
04/10 09:33, , 67F
04/10 09:33, 67F
推
04/10 12:14, , 68F
04/10 12:14, 68F
推
04/10 13:12, , 69F
04/10 13:12, 69F
推
04/10 13:24, , 70F
04/10 13:24, 70F
推
04/10 17:51, , 71F
04/10 17:51, 71F
推
04/11 02:04, , 72F
04/11 02:04, 72F
推
04/11 10:51, , 73F
04/11 10:51, 73F
→
04/11 10:52, , 74F
04/11 10:52, 74F
推
01/10 13:40, , 75F
01/10 13:40, 75F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 4 篇):