[負雷]星戰:俠盜一號,ID4星際重生般的悲劇
看了一堆說星際大戰:俠盜一號
好雷的影評
真的眼睛是都瞎了?
就舉三點來說
1.
兩位亞洲配角,根本就和ID4:星際重生一樣花瓶
跟劇情扯不上多大的關係,但卻一值佔版面
然後 甄子丹 一邊念經一邊開無敵.無視史尼克局長精銳風暴士兵攻擊
把總開關開啟
這麼扯的事.你們說"好雷"的可以接受?
星戰迷會接受???
2.劇情中後段神扯,
女主角要去最後一顆星球時,原本在反抗軍執行檯面下動作的特工
忽然都良心發現,特工自願變成上前線的一般兵?
你乾脆說星際大戰裡面
那些科技研發人員,不只腦袋好,戰場上還都身經百戰算了
劇情轉超硬
3.
帝國軍風暴士兵.此作變神爛
在星戰系列原始劇本上,
士兵武力強弱比較:
絕地武士 > 風暴兵 > 商會機械人 > 反抗軍
結果現在卻是,主角要拿死星資料時
一台機械人,拿一把手槍,
可以幹爆攻堅的風暴士兵,還能閒暇之餘幫主角調資料?
那帝國幹嘛還要風暴士兵?
全部做機械人就好了啊,一台雜工機械人殺十幾位風暴兵????????
導演在幹啥吃的??
---------------------------------------------
為了亞州市場,
塞了兩位華人,然後給他們一堆無關劇情的畫面~
把亞洲人畫面刪掉,
然後總開關由白人打開
完全不損劇情發展
星戰系列,
就這部吃相最難看
然後一堆人在捧
這嘴臉也很難看
END
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 218.164.14.14
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/movie/M.1481792422.A.5CE.html
噓
12/15 17:02, , 1F
12/15 17:02, 1F
推
12/15 17:03, , 2F
12/15 17:03, 2F
噓
12/15 17:04, , 3F
12/15 17:04, 3F
....你真的有看過系列作嗎?帝國的士兵,規模,跟建制,都比反抗軍不知道強多少了
推
12/15 17:04, , 4F
12/15 17:04, 4F
...風暴兵是賞金獵人的複製體,然後你跟我說他們槍法很爛??
噓
12/15 17:05, , 5F
12/15 17:05, 5F
噓
12/15 17:07, , 6F
12/15 17:07, 6F
...你能回一篇反我這三點的"合理"回應?
→
12/15 17:08, , 7F
12/15 17:08, 7F
噓
12/15 17:09, , 8F
12/15 17:09, 8F
噓
12/15 17:09, , 9F
12/15 17:09, 9F
→
12/15 17:09, , 10F
12/15 17:09, 10F
→
12/15 17:12, , 11F
12/15 17:12, 11F
→
12/15 17:12, , 12F
12/15 17:12, 12F
...我認為是在死星毀滅後才開始徵招一般人的
→
12/15 17:12, , 13F
12/15 17:12, 13F
推
12/15 17:15, , 14F
12/15 17:15, 14F
推
12/15 17:15, , 15F
12/15 17:15, 15F
推
12/15 17:17, , 16F
12/15 17:17, 16F
→
12/15 17:17, , 17F
12/15 17:17, 17F
噓
12/15 17:19, , 18F
12/15 17:19, 18F
...這麼明顯的BUG,卻還要硬挺,為何不能批?那大家都去看海棉寶寶的劇情好了?
噓
12/15 17:19, , 19F
12/15 17:19, 19F
→
12/15 17:20, , 20F
12/15 17:20, 20F
※ 編輯: andy8292 (218.164.14.14), 12/15/2016 17:36:57
噓
12/15 17:31, , 21F
12/15 17:31, 21F
噓
12/15 17:35, , 22F
12/15 17:35, 22F
→
12/15 17:38, , 23F
12/15 17:38, 23F
→
12/15 17:38, , 24F
12/15 17:38, 24F
→
12/15 17:38, , 25F
12/15 17:38, 25F
推
12/15 17:40, , 26F
12/15 17:40, 26F
→
12/15 17:40, , 27F
12/15 17:40, 27F
→
12/15 17:41, , 28F
12/15 17:41, 28F
→
12/15 17:42, , 29F
12/15 17:42, 29F
推
12/15 17:43, , 30F
12/15 17:43, 30F
→
12/15 17:43, , 31F
12/15 17:43, 31F
推
12/15 17:44, , 32F
12/15 17:44, 32F
噓
12/15 17:44, , 33F
12/15 17:44, 33F
→
12/15 17:45, , 34F
12/15 17:45, 34F
噓
12/15 17:47, , 35F
12/15 17:47, 35F
推
12/15 17:51, , 36F
12/15 17:51, 36F
推
12/15 18:07, , 37F
12/15 18:07, 37F
噓
12/15 18:14, , 38F
12/15 18:14, 38F
噓
12/15 18:19, , 39F
12/15 18:19, 39F
→
12/15 18:20, , 40F
12/15 18:20, 40F
→
12/15 18:21, , 41F
12/15 18:21, 41F
→
12/15 18:23, , 42F
12/15 18:23, 42F
→
12/15 18:23, , 43F
12/15 18:23, 43F
推
12/15 18:25, , 44F
12/15 18:25, 44F
→
12/15 18:25, , 45F
12/15 18:25, 45F
噓
12/15 18:25, , 46F
12/15 18:25, 46F
→
12/15 18:26, , 47F
12/15 18:26, 47F
噓
12/15 19:37, , 48F
12/15 19:37, 48F
噓
12/15 19:52, , 49F
12/15 19:52, 49F
推
12/15 20:10, , 50F
12/15 20:10, 50F
推
12/15 20:15, , 51F
12/15 20:15, 51F
噓
12/15 20:35, , 52F
12/15 20:35, 52F
推
12/15 20:38, , 53F
12/15 20:38, 53F
推
12/15 20:45, , 54F
12/15 20:45, 54F
推
12/15 22:21, , 55F
12/15 22:21, 55F
推
12/15 22:23, , 56F
12/15 22:23, 56F
推
12/15 22:27, , 57F
12/15 22:27, 57F
→
12/15 22:27, , 58F
12/15 22:27, 58F
→
12/15 22:28, , 59F
12/15 22:28, 59F
噓
12/15 22:34, , 60F
12/15 22:34, 60F
噓
12/15 22:41, , 61F
12/15 22:41, 61F
噓
12/15 23:11, , 62F
12/15 23:11, 62F
→
12/15 23:12, , 63F
12/15 23:12, 63F
噓
12/15 23:16, , 64F
12/15 23:16, 64F
推
12/15 23:46, , 65F
12/15 23:46, 65F
推
12/16 00:57, , 66F
12/16 00:57, 66F
噓
12/16 01:40, , 67F
12/16 01:40, 67F
噓
12/16 02:10, , 68F
12/16 02:10, 68F
→
12/16 02:11, , 69F
12/16 02:11, 69F
→
12/16 02:48, , 70F
12/16 02:48, 70F
→
12/16 02:48, , 71F
12/16 02:48, 71F
→
12/16 02:48, , 72F
12/16 02:48, 72F
推
12/16 21:36, , 73F
12/16 21:36, 73F
推
12/16 21:44, , 74F
12/16 21:44, 74F
→
12/16 21:44, , 75F
12/16 21:44, 75F
推
12/18 14:13, , 76F
12/18 14:13, 76F
噓
12/18 15:28, , 77F
12/18 15:28, 77F
→
12/18 15:28, , 78F
12/18 15:28, 78F
推
12/18 15:39, , 79F
12/18 15:39, 79F
推
12/18 16:42, , 80F
12/18 16:42, 80F
噓
12/19 11:02, , 81F
12/19 11:02, 81F
噓
12/19 16:57, , 82F
12/19 16:57, 82F
噓
12/20 02:22, , 83F
12/20 02:22, 83F
推
12/24 04:48, , 84F
12/24 04:48, 84F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):