[討論] 大家覺得美國隊長3排第幾名?
討論範圍僅限超級英雄電影
不知道這次美國隊長3:英雄內戰在大家心目中排名是第幾名?
先說我對這次美3的看法
劇情非常流暢且完整
超過兩小時的英雄片卻毫無冷場
即使看第二遍還是目不轉睛
這麼多的角色出場卻毫無雜亂感且有次序(對照復2)
武打場面也是爽到極致
加上各個英雄的超能力的特色都有做出來
我心中的排名:
1.黑暗騎士
2.美國隊長2:酷寒戰士
3.美國隊長3:英雄內戰
連超立方都說,黑暗騎士不算是"純"超級英雄電影,所以美3是最棒的純超級英雄電影
至於美2相對於美3的劇情更加完整且有更多的陰謀論
武打動作流暢、拳拳到肉
雖然美2角色不多,可是卻能夠一直抓住觀眾注意力
這就是它成功的地方
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 210.242.30.250
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/movie/M.1462246498.A.35B.html
推
05/03 11:38, , 1F
05/03 11:38, 1F
噓
05/03 11:39, , 2F
05/03 11:39, 2F
打臉的點是? 美3好,美2更好
→
05/03 11:39, , 3F
05/03 11:39, 3F
推
05/03 11:41, , 4F
05/03 11:41, 4F
推
05/03 11:42, , 5F
05/03 11:42, 5F
※ 編輯: tenminutes (210.242.30.250), 05/03/2016 11:43:56
推
05/03 11:43, , 6F
05/03 11:43, 6F
推
05/03 11:44, , 7F
05/03 11:44, 7F
推
05/03 11:44, , 8F
05/03 11:44, 8F
美2和美3光看武打是分不出高下
可能也跟我看之前的期待有關
美2給我的驚喜多到數不清,所以才會覺得美2這麼好
噓
05/03 11:45, , 9F
05/03 11:45, 9F
※ 編輯: tenminutes (210.242.30.250), 05/03/2016 11:47:10
推
05/03 11:45, , 10F
05/03 11:45, 10F
→
05/03 11:46, , 11F
05/03 11:46, 11F
→
05/03 11:58, , 12F
05/03 11:58, 12F
推
05/03 12:02, , 13F
05/03 12:02, 13F
推
05/03 12:06, , 14F
05/03 12:06, 14F
推
05/03 12:13, , 15F
05/03 12:13, 15F
推
05/03 12:18, , 16F
05/03 12:18, 16F
→
05/03 12:19, , 17F
05/03 12:19, 17F
→
05/03 12:19, , 18F
05/03 12:19, 18F
推
05/03 12:22, , 19F
05/03 12:22, 19F
→
05/03 12:22, , 20F
05/03 12:22, 20F
推
05/03 12:23, , 21F
05/03 12:23, 21F
→
05/03 12:24, , 22F
05/03 12:24, 22F
→
05/03 12:24, , 23F
05/03 12:24, 23F
推
05/03 12:25, , 24F
05/03 12:25, 24F
推
05/03 12:31, , 25F
05/03 12:31, 25F
推
05/03 12:35, , 26F
05/03 12:35, 26F
推
05/03 12:37, , 27F
05/03 12:37, 27F
推
05/03 12:42, , 28F
05/03 12:42, 28F
推
05/03 12:43, , 29F
05/03 12:43, 29F
推
05/03 12:44, , 30F
05/03 12:44, 30F
推
05/03 12:47, , 31F
05/03 12:47, 31F
推
05/03 12:55, , 32F
05/03 12:55, 32F
推
05/03 13:02, , 33F
05/03 13:02, 33F
噓
05/03 13:07, , 34F
05/03 13:07, 34F
推
05/03 13:07, , 35F
05/03 13:07, 35F
噓
05/03 13:14, , 36F
05/03 13:14, 36F
噓
05/03 13:22, , 37F
05/03 13:22, 37F
推
05/03 13:25, , 38F
05/03 13:25, 38F
推
05/03 13:28, , 39F
05/03 13:28, 39F
推
05/03 13:29, , 40F
05/03 13:29, 40F
推
05/03 13:30, , 41F
05/03 13:30, 41F
推
05/03 13:30, , 42F
05/03 13:30, 42F
推
05/03 13:31, , 43F
05/03 13:31, 43F
→
05/03 13:32, , 44F
05/03 13:32, 44F
推
05/03 13:32, , 45F
05/03 13:32, 45F
→
05/03 13:32, , 46F
05/03 13:32, 46F
→
05/03 13:36, , 47F
05/03 13:36, 47F
推
05/03 13:37, , 48F
05/03 13:37, 48F
推
05/03 13:43, , 49F
05/03 13:43, 49F
推
05/03 13:45, , 50F
05/03 13:45, 50F
→
05/03 13:46, , 51F
05/03 13:46, 51F
→
05/03 13:46, , 52F
05/03 13:46, 52F
→
05/03 14:04, , 53F
05/03 14:04, 53F
→
05/03 14:16, , 54F
05/03 14:16, 54F
推
05/03 14:18, , 55F
05/03 14:18, 55F
→
05/03 14:19, , 56F
05/03 14:19, 56F
推
05/03 14:31, , 57F
05/03 14:31, 57F
推
05/03 14:59, , 58F
05/03 14:59, 58F
推
05/03 15:04, , 59F
05/03 15:04, 59F
推
05/03 15:15, , 60F
05/03 15:15, 60F
推
05/03 15:17, , 61F
05/03 15:17, 61F
→
05/03 15:17, , 62F
05/03 15:17, 62F
推
05/03 15:47, , 63F
05/03 15:47, 63F
推
05/03 15:59, , 64F
05/03 15:59, 64F
→
05/03 15:59, , 65F
05/03 15:59, 65F
推
05/03 16:00, , 66F
05/03 16:00, 66F
→
05/03 16:01, , 67F
05/03 16:01, 67F
→
05/03 16:01, , 68F
05/03 16:01, 68F
推
05/03 16:18, , 69F
05/03 16:18, 69F
推
05/03 16:37, , 70F
05/03 16:37, 70F
→
05/03 16:43, , 71F
05/03 16:43, 71F
推
05/03 16:57, , 72F
05/03 16:57, 72F
→
05/03 16:58, , 73F
05/03 16:58, 73F
推
05/03 17:58, , 74F
05/03 17:58, 74F
推
05/03 18:05, , 75F
05/03 18:05, 75F
推
05/03 19:28, , 76F
05/03 19:28, 76F
推
05/03 21:43, , 77F
05/03 21:43, 77F
推
05/03 23:26, , 78F
05/03 23:26, 78F
推
05/05 07:57, , 79F
05/05 07:57, 79F