Re: [問題] 國外鄉民對於TLC或MLC看法如何?
※ 引述《NewMacpro (Mika(o'A'o))》之銘言:
: 毛真多
: 我iphone4還在使用中 從ipod iphone ipad imac使用到現在的我
: 蘋果根本沒得挑剔
: 那我們早期買的人不都是傻子?
我自己也有用apple產品,但是我無法理解有人可以有這種想法
香港方面已有測試
http://h0.hkepc.com/11911/page/3
擷取一段如下
"使用 MLC NAND Flash 的 iPhone 6 64GB 樣本,在進行相同的拷貝時
Memory usage 只輕微上升,並不會像 TLC 版本突使佔用大量記憶體,
而且 Random Copy 時 TLC NAND Flash 的 iPhone 6 64GB 樣本曾經導
致此程式閃退,系統變得極不穩定,但 MLC NAND Flash 的 iPhone 6
64GB 樣本並沒有此一問題。"
一樣價錢,你可能買到好貨或會閃退/不穩定的產品
這樣還不能在意,還上來護航,真的是奇文共賞
擷取結論
"HKEPC 實驗室為買到 MLC 版本 iPhone 6 的讀者感到高興,同時對買
到 TLC 版本iPhone 6 的讀者遭遇表示遺憾及難過,推介你們參加
Apple Care 服務吧,否則一年過後問題多多自找煩惱。"
可以多一點理性嗎? apple東西真的不錯,但是不是神OK?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.116.48.163
※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/iPhone/M.1415937020.A.76A.html
→
11/14 11:57, , 1F
11/14 11:57, 1F
→
11/14 11:58, , 2F
11/14 11:58, 2F
→
11/14 11:58, , 3F
11/14 11:58, 3F
→
11/14 12:00, , 4F
11/14 12:00, 4F
推
11/14 12:01, , 5F
11/14 12:01, 5F
→
11/14 12:01, , 6F
11/14 12:01, 6F
→
11/14 12:01, , 7F
11/14 12:01, 7F
→
11/14 12:01, , 8F
11/14 12:01, 8F
→
11/14 12:02, , 9F
11/14 12:02, 9F
推
11/14 12:04, , 10F
11/14 12:04, 10F
→
11/14 12:04, , 11F
11/14 12:04, 11F
→
11/14 12:04, , 12F
11/14 12:04, 12F
→
11/14 12:04, , 13F
11/14 12:04, 13F
→
11/14 12:04, , 14F
11/14 12:04, 14F
→
11/14 12:05, , 15F
11/14 12:05, 15F
→
11/14 12:06, , 16F
11/14 12:06, 16F
推
11/14 12:07, , 17F
11/14 12:07, 17F
推
11/14 12:07, , 18F
11/14 12:07, 18F
推
11/14 12:07, , 19F
11/14 12:07, 19F
→
11/14 12:08, , 20F
11/14 12:08, 20F
推
11/14 12:09, , 21F
11/14 12:09, 21F
→
11/14 12:09, , 22F
11/14 12:09, 22F
→
11/14 12:10, , 23F
11/14 12:10, 23F
推
11/14 12:11, , 24F
11/14 12:11, 24F
推
11/14 12:12, , 25F
11/14 12:12, 25F
→
11/14 12:13, , 26F
11/14 12:13, 26F
→
11/14 12:13, , 27F
11/14 12:13, 27F
→
11/14 12:15, , 28F
11/14 12:15, 28F
推
11/14 12:17, , 29F
11/14 12:17, 29F
推
11/14 12:25, , 30F
11/14 12:25, 30F
推
11/14 12:27, , 31F
11/14 12:27, 31F
推
11/14 12:28, , 32F
11/14 12:28, 32F
→
11/14 12:29, , 33F
11/14 12:29, 33F
推
11/14 12:31, , 34F
11/14 12:31, 34F
推
11/14 12:33, , 35F
11/14 12:33, 35F
推
11/14 12:33, , 36F
11/14 12:33, 36F
→
11/14 12:34, , 37F
11/14 12:34, 37F
→
11/14 12:34, , 38F
11/14 12:34, 38F
→
11/14 12:35, , 39F
11/14 12:35, 39F
推
11/14 12:35, , 40F
11/14 12:35, 40F
→
11/14 12:35, , 41F
11/14 12:35, 41F
推
11/14 12:38, , 42F
11/14 12:38, 42F
推
11/14 12:41, , 43F
11/14 12:41, 43F
推
11/14 12:42, , 44F
11/14 12:42, 44F
推
11/14 12:43, , 45F
11/14 12:43, 45F
推
11/14 12:44, , 46F
11/14 12:44, 46F
推
11/14 12:44, , 47F
11/14 12:44, 47F
推
11/14 12:44, , 48F
11/14 12:44, 48F
推
11/14 12:46, , 49F
11/14 12:46, 49F
→
11/14 12:46, , 50F
11/14 12:46, 50F
推
11/14 12:46, , 51F
11/14 12:46, 51F
→
11/14 12:50, , 52F
11/14 12:50, 52F
推
11/14 12:52, , 53F
11/14 12:52, 53F
推
11/14 12:53, , 54F
11/14 12:53, 54F
推
11/14 13:01, , 55F
11/14 13:01, 55F
推
11/14 13:02, , 56F
11/14 13:02, 56F
推
11/14 13:16, , 57F
11/14 13:16, 57F
→
11/14 13:42, , 58F
11/14 13:42, 58F
推
11/14 14:17, , 59F
11/14 14:17, 59F
推
11/14 14:49, , 60F
11/14 14:49, 60F
推
11/14 15:50, , 61F
11/14 15:50, 61F
→
11/14 15:51, , 62F
11/14 15:51, 62F
→
11/14 17:22, , 63F
11/14 17:22, 63F
推
11/14 18:38, , 64F
11/14 18:38, 64F
推
11/14 21:32, , 65F
11/14 21:32, 65F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 7 篇):