[閒聊] 買了難以脫手、也無法養老的中古屋怎麼辦
前幾天也有陪我朋友看板橋的房子
看到一間在某國中附近,25坪開8百多
仲仲說可以努力談7xx
我好羨慕!這間比我那間貴一百萬
可是使用坪數多了五坪、格局也方正
要不是我已經買了不然很想買!
剛剛問他,他不買了
原因是家人說這間四樓、以後老了很難爬
這個樓層、這個地點也不好脫手
(離捷運走路快半小時)
說都更也不太可能因為在巷子裡
這裡有買4樓以上、30幾年老房、巷弄內的人嗎?你們未來怎麼辦呢?
-----
Sent from JPTT on my iPhone
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 118.150.143.69
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/home-sale/M.1478051834.A.75D.html
推
11/02 09:59, , 1F
11/02 09:59, 1F
→
11/02 10:00, , 2F
11/02 10:00, 2F
推
11/02 10:04, , 3F
11/02 10:04, 3F
現在是30幾年,風韻猶存,再住個20年就是50幾歲的歐巴桑。現在有賣相,50年的房子會
有人想買嗎?
推
11/02 10:06, , 4F
11/02 10:06, 4F
推
11/02 10:10, , 5F
11/02 10:10, 5F
推
11/02 10:10, , 6F
11/02 10:10, 6F
→
11/02 10:10, , 7F
11/02 10:10, 7F
推
11/02 10:11, , 8F
11/02 10:11, 8F
推
11/02 10:13, , 9F
11/02 10:13, 9F
※ 編輯: jadishcat (118.150.143.69), 11/02/2016 10:15:41
推
11/02 10:13, , 10F
11/02 10:13, 10F
推
11/02 10:29, , 11F
11/02 10:29, 11F
推
11/02 10:32, , 12F
11/02 10:32, 12F
推
11/02 10:34, , 13F
11/02 10:34, 13F
推
11/02 10:37, , 14F
11/02 10:37, 14F
推
11/02 10:38, , 15F
11/02 10:38, 15F
推
11/02 10:42, , 16F
11/02 10:42, 16F
→
11/02 10:48, , 17F
11/02 10:48, 17F
推
11/02 10:48, , 18F
11/02 10:48, 18F
→
11/02 10:52, , 19F
11/02 10:52, 19F
推
11/02 11:00, , 20F
11/02 11:00, 20F
推
11/02 11:02, , 21F
11/02 11:02, 21F
噓
11/02 11:03, , 22F
11/02 11:03, 22F
噓
11/02 11:22, , 23F
11/02 11:22, 23F
推
11/02 11:25, , 24F
11/02 11:25, 24F
推
11/02 11:28, , 25F
11/02 11:28, 25F
→
11/02 11:28, , 26F
11/02 11:28, 26F
推
11/02 11:32, , 27F
11/02 11:32, 27F
推
11/02 11:33, , 28F
11/02 11:33, 28F
那你可以告訴我屋主怎麼想的嗎?
→
11/02 11:34, , 29F
11/02 11:34, 29F
推
11/02 11:34, , 30F
11/02 11:34, 30F
推
11/02 11:35, , 31F
11/02 11:35, 31F
→
11/02 11:35, , 32F
11/02 11:35, 32F
→
11/02 11:37, , 33F
11/02 11:37, 33F
→
11/02 11:38, , 34F
11/02 11:38, 34F
推
11/02 12:09, , 35F
11/02 12:09, 35F
推
11/02 12:12, , 36F
11/02 12:12, 36F
推
11/02 12:17, , 37F
11/02 12:17, 37F
推
11/02 12:20, , 38F
11/02 12:20, 38F
推
11/02 12:22, , 39F
11/02 12:22, 39F
※ 編輯: jadishcat (118.150.143.69), 11/02/2016 12:27:02
推
11/02 12:28, , 40F
11/02 12:28, 40F
推
11/02 12:31, , 41F
11/02 12:31, 41F
推
11/02 12:32, , 42F
11/02 12:32, 42F
→
11/02 12:32, , 43F
11/02 12:32, 43F
推
11/02 12:33, , 44F
11/02 12:33, 44F
推
11/02 12:37, , 45F
11/02 12:37, 45F
→
11/02 12:59, , 46F
11/02 12:59, 46F
→
11/02 13:32, , 47F
11/02 13:32, 47F
→
11/02 13:32, , 48F
11/02 13:32, 48F
→
11/02 13:33, , 49F
11/02 13:33, 49F
→
11/02 13:41, , 50F
11/02 13:41, 50F
→
11/02 13:42, , 51F
11/02 13:42, 51F
推
11/02 13:45, , 52F
11/02 13:45, 52F
→
11/02 13:46, , 53F
11/02 13:46, 53F
推
11/02 13:59, , 54F
11/02 13:59, 54F
→
11/02 14:00, , 55F
11/02 14:00, 55F
→
11/02 14:01, , 56F
11/02 14:01, 56F
推
11/02 16:01, , 57F
11/02 16:01, 57F
推
11/02 16:47, , 58F
11/02 16:47, 58F
→
11/02 16:56, , 59F
11/02 16:56, 59F
→
11/02 17:04, , 60F
11/02 17:04, 60F
推
11/03 10:02, , 61F
11/03 10:02, 61F
推
11/03 11:15, , 62F
11/03 11:15, 62F
→
11/03 11:28, , 63F
11/03 11:28, 63F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):