[問題] 6X歲的教授開Infiniti適合嗎?
本魯的指導教授最近打算購車,幾次聊天都跟我說他想買Infiniti Q50
主要喜歡它的運動化、配備完整等等...
可是又怕車款外型太過於年輕,跟他形象不搭(教授今年大概63歲)
所以另一方面也有在考慮同級的雙B,但又覺得配備跟Q50比起來太過陽春
因此陷入一個無限迴圈的糾結,每次Meeting結束就一直跟我討論這個問題
本魯給的建議是,一樣的價錢可以買到更好更完整的配備,那為什麼不呢?
不需要太在意別人的看法(狂電我們的時候都不在意我們對他的看法了XD)
我知道他會看PTT,所以特別上來問一下鄉民們
大家覺得一位年近65的教授適合開Q50嗎?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 172.111.144.33
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/car/M.1470992064.A.DB5.html
※ 編輯: auston0301 (172.111.144.33), 08/12/2016 16:55:18
推
08/12 16:54, , 1F
08/12 16:54, 1F
推
08/12 16:56, , 2F
08/12 16:56, 2F
→
08/12 16:56, , 3F
08/12 16:56, 3F
XDD
推
08/12 16:56, , 4F
08/12 16:56, 4F
大大跟我舉一樣的例子耶~
→
08/12 16:59, , 5F
08/12 16:59, 5F
Q50內裝不到老氣吧
→
08/12 16:59, , 6F
08/12 16:59, 6F
推
08/12 16:59, , 7F
08/12 16:59, 7F
推
08/12 17:00, , 8F
08/12 17:00, 8F
令尊一定很酷
推
08/12 17:01, , 9F
08/12 17:01, 9F
推
08/12 17:04, , 10F
08/12 17:04, 10F
→
08/12 17:04, , 11F
08/12 17:04, 11F
推
08/12 17:06, , 12F
08/12 17:06, 12F
推
08/12 17:06, , 13F
08/12 17:06, 13F
460L載蛋應該比較不會破吧~~
※ 編輯: auston0301 (172.111.144.33), 08/12/2016 17:09:09
推
08/12 17:08, , 14F
08/12 17:08, 14F
→
08/12 17:09, , 15F
08/12 17:09, 15F
推
08/12 17:10, , 16F
08/12 17:10, 16F
→
08/12 17:10, , 17F
08/12 17:10, 17F
推
08/12 17:10, , 18F
08/12 17:10, 18F
→
08/12 17:10, , 19F
08/12 17:10, 19F
推
08/12 17:12, , 20F
08/12 17:12, 20F
推
08/12 17:14, , 21F
08/12 17:14, 21F
→
08/12 17:14, , 22F
08/12 17:14, 22F
→
08/12 17:15, , 23F
08/12 17:15, 23F
→
08/12 17:16, , 24F
08/12 17:16, 24F
推
08/12 17:18, , 25F
08/12 17:18, 25F
推
08/12 17:18, , 26F
08/12 17:18, 26F
推
08/12 17:21, , 27F
08/12 17:21, 27F
推
08/12 17:29, , 28F
08/12 17:29, 28F
推
08/12 17:30, , 29F
08/12 17:30, 29F
推
08/12 17:34, , 30F
08/12 17:34, 30F
噓
08/12 17:37, , 31F
08/12 17:37, 31F
推
08/12 17:38, , 32F
08/12 17:38, 32F
→
08/12 17:39, , 33F
08/12 17:39, 33F
→
08/12 17:40, , 34F
08/12 17:40, 34F
還有 38 則推文
→
08/12 20:02, , 73F
08/12 20:02, 73F
推
08/12 20:11, , 74F
08/12 20:11, 74F
推
08/12 20:14, , 75F
08/12 20:14, 75F
推
08/12 20:27, , 76F
08/12 20:27, 76F
推
08/12 20:51, , 77F
08/12 20:51, 77F
推
08/12 21:01, , 78F
08/12 21:01, 78F
→
08/12 21:31, , 79F
08/12 21:31, 79F
推
08/12 21:39, , 80F
08/12 21:39, 80F
推
08/12 21:41, , 81F
08/12 21:41, 81F
→
08/12 21:41, , 82F
08/12 21:41, 82F
推
08/12 21:42, , 83F
08/12 21:42, 83F
→
08/12 21:42, , 84F
08/12 21:42, 84F
推
08/12 21:56, , 85F
08/12 21:56, 85F
推
08/12 22:21, , 86F
08/12 22:21, 86F
推
08/12 22:24, , 87F
08/12 22:24, 87F
推
08/12 22:26, , 88F
08/12 22:26, 88F
推
08/12 22:56, , 89F
08/12 22:56, 89F
推
08/12 23:20, , 90F
08/12 23:20, 90F
推
08/12 23:26, , 91F
08/12 23:26, 91F
→
08/12 23:27, , 92F
08/12 23:27, 92F
推
08/12 23:40, , 93F
08/12 23:40, 93F
推
08/13 00:10, , 94F
08/13 00:10, 94F
→
08/13 00:10, , 95F
08/13 00:10, 95F
推
08/13 00:15, , 96F
08/13 00:15, 96F
→
08/13 00:15, , 97F
08/13 00:15, 97F
→
08/13 00:15, , 98F
08/13 00:15, 98F
→
08/13 00:25, , 99F
08/13 00:25, 99F
推
08/13 01:31, , 100F
08/13 01:31, 100F
推
08/13 04:46, , 101F
08/13 04:46, 101F
推
08/13 08:46, , 102F
08/13 08:46, 102F
推
08/13 10:58, , 103F
08/13 10:58, 103F
→
08/13 10:58, , 104F
08/13 10:58, 104F
→
08/13 10:58, , 105F
08/13 10:58, 105F
→
08/13 13:21, , 106F
08/13 13:21, 106F
推
08/13 17:39, , 107F
08/13 17:39, 107F
→
08/13 17:39, , 108F
08/13 17:39, 108F
推
08/13 23:39, , 109F
08/13 23:39, 109F
推
08/14 09:24, , 110F
08/14 09:24, 110F
→
08/15 11:20, , 111F
08/15 11:20, 111F
推
08/17 12:55, , 112F
08/17 12:55, 112F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):