[討論] TIIDA V.S. FOCUS已回收
FOCUS 3W
車子小 但是我覺得超控性佳~而且蠻有力的
車子踩起來也不會頓 但是家人一至不贊成
原因是福特給人"買車買到好 修車修到老"的印象
還一天到晚說那個誰誰誰的福特車又在修漏油
那個什麼什麼車二手價很低很低 聽這些都飽了
我去問到的報價就是
雜牌導航+行車紀錄器+抬頭顯示+
全車隔熱紙(擋風3M 全車VCOOL+
&乙式全險 強制險 領牌全部辦到好67萬
BIG TIIDA SV(定速 IKEY 倒車雷達)
車子空間大 但據說比較不安全?操控性就是順順開
快速道路上去就100KM沒問題 前後也有3個同事買舊款TIIDA
家人也說不錯 但總覺得左岸的車就是不舒服
而且嚴老大的車據說失竊率也比較高
來說一下報價好了 69.9萬 空車折3萬 然後再選3萬配備 所以是66.9萬
但領牌稅金強制險全險另外加 辦到好應該72萬
大家覺得哪一台車比較優呢
PS 使用環境是以後老婆懷孕要帶老婆上下班還有我自己上下班
每天高速公路平地各半吧 一天40KM左右 假日會出去玩
=>如果有比較優的菜單也歡迎討論.然後頭又大的車聽到頭就大了 不考慮
--
→
07/10 17:44,
07/10 17:44
推
07/10 17:46,
07/10 17:46
推
07/10 18:00,
07/10 18:00
→
07/10 18:04,
07/10 18:04
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 210.242.25.82
→
02/01 13:41, , 1F
02/01 13:41, 1F
→
02/01 13:42, , 2F
02/01 13:42, 2F
→
02/01 13:42, , 3F
02/01 13:42, 3F
→
02/01 13:46, , 4F
02/01 13:46, 4F
推
02/01 13:53, , 5F
02/01 13:53, 5F
→
02/01 13:58, , 6F
02/01 13:58, 6F
推
02/01 14:06, , 7F
02/01 14:06, 7F
→
02/01 14:08, , 8F
02/01 14:08, 8F
推
02/01 14:12, , 9F
02/01 14:12, 9F
→
02/01 14:13, , 10F
02/01 14:13, 10F
→
02/01 14:13, , 11F
02/01 14:13, 11F
推
02/01 14:34, , 12F
02/01 14:34, 12F
→
02/01 14:37, , 13F
02/01 14:37, 13F
推
02/01 16:13, , 14F
02/01 16:13, 14F
→
02/01 16:14, , 15F
02/01 16:14, 15F
→
02/01 16:15, , 16F
02/01 16:15, 16F
→
02/01 16:16, , 17F
02/01 16:16, 17F
→
02/01 16:17, , 18F
02/01 16:17, 18F
→
02/01 16:17, , 19F
02/01 16:17, 19F
→
02/01 16:18, , 20F
02/01 16:18, 20F
→
02/01 16:19, , 21F
02/01 16:19, 21F
推
02/01 16:22, , 22F
02/01 16:22, 22F
推
02/01 16:22, , 23F
02/01 16:22, 23F
推
02/01 16:29, , 24F
02/01 16:29, 24F
→
02/01 16:36, , 25F
02/01 16:36, 25F
→
02/01 16:36, , 26F
02/01 16:36, 26F
推
02/01 16:42, , 27F
02/01 16:42, 27F
推
02/01 16:52, , 28F
02/01 16:52, 28F
推
02/01 16:52, , 29F
02/01 16:52, 29F
→
02/01 16:53, , 30F
02/01 16:53, 30F
推
02/01 17:09, , 31F
02/01 17:09, 31F
→
02/01 17:10, , 32F
02/01 17:10, 32F
→
02/01 17:10, , 33F
02/01 17:10, 33F
推
02/01 18:42, , 34F
02/01 18:42, 34F
→
02/01 20:20, , 35F
02/01 20:20, 35F
推
02/01 20:51, , 36F
02/01 20:51, 36F
推
02/01 20:53, , 37F
02/01 20:53, 37F
推
02/01 21:01, , 38F
02/01 21:01, 38F
推
02/01 21:48, , 39F
02/01 21:48, 39F
推
02/01 21:51, , 40F
02/01 21:51, 40F
推
02/01 21:55, , 41F
02/01 21:55, 41F
推
02/01 21:59, , 42F
02/01 21:59, 42F
推
02/01 22:07, , 43F
02/01 22:07, 43F
推
02/01 22:45, , 44F
02/01 22:45, 44F
→
02/01 22:45, , 45F
02/01 22:45, 45F
推
02/01 22:47, , 46F
02/01 22:47, 46F
→
02/01 22:47, , 47F
02/01 22:47, 47F
推
02/01 23:50, , 48F
02/01 23:50, 48F
推
02/02 01:58, , 49F
02/02 01:58, 49F
→
02/02 02:00, , 50F
02/02 02:00, 50F
推
02/02 11:02, , 51F
02/02 11:02, 51F
推
02/02 16:52, , 52F
02/02 16:52, 52F
推
02/03 09:42, , 53F
02/03 09:42, 53F
推
02/03 13:01, , 54F
02/03 13:01, 54F
推
02/03 19:34, , 55F
02/03 19:34, 55F
推
02/03 22:47, , 56F
02/03 22:47, 56F
→
02/03 22:48, , 57F
02/03 22:48, 57F
→
02/04 10:57, , 58F
02/04 10:57, 58F
→
02/04 10:58, , 59F
02/04 10:58, 59F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):