[閒聊] 臺灣似乎還不適合車速分流?已刪文
理性勿戰
先聲明,我是強烈支持車速分流的
平時騎車我大多騎在機車有路權的外側快車道
時速也總是跟上車流,不當路隊長
我常在晚上約8~9點時,從高雄騎台一到屏東
這時間點屏東市到麟洛的車很少,所以時速大概都在70↑
但我已經遇過非常多次以下狀況:
我騎在外側快車道約70km/h,內側快車道無任何車輛
後面的四輪快速駛來,猛按喇叭逼我讓道,然後同線刷卡超車
今天還差點被攔車,還好我及時鑽進小巷裡
也不限於屏東該路段,這種藐視二輪路權的四輪到處都有
也讓我不禁懷疑,車速分流真的適合臺灣嗎?
駕駛人素質如此低落的地方,若真開放車速分流,二輪似乎只會更受壓迫
尤其機車遇到惡意逼車時,根本沒有自保的能力
被攔車時沒騎好可能摔車,四輪拿傢伙時也無從防禦
就算裝記錄器或叫警察,也無法在立即對自己有保護的作用
尤其是郊區,可能出事了還沒人會發現…
如果後車是輕按喇叭或閃遠燈,我會很樂意退到旁邊讓他過
但passing燈對某些駕駛來說,還算滿多餘的功能呢
我的想法是,臺灣的劣質駕駛人太多了(不限車種)
若開放機車行駛內側、直接左轉
在這個素質低落的道路環境,汽機車駕駛人違規積非成是
汽車不會因為修法而減少對機車的歧視
機車的弱勢程度,應該不會有明顯的改善?
唉,在鬼島還是買台四輪比較實在
至少在遇到垃圾駕駛時,還能躲在鈑金裡打110
以後騎車時還是生命為重,乖乖閃邊,活下來才能爭取路權啊…
感謝各位看完碎碎念廢文
無意引戰,希望是理性討論唷^_^
--
推
05/09 19:51,
05/09 19:51
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.237.200.228
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/biker/M.1474223879.A.C35.html
推
09/19 02:58, , 1F
09/19 02:58, 1F
→
09/19 02:58, , 2F
09/19 02:58, 2F
冰凍三尺非一日之寒
推
09/19 03:14, , 3F
09/19 03:14, 3F
→
09/19 03:14, , 4F
09/19 03:14, 4F
推
09/19 03:20, , 5F
09/19 03:20, 5F
推
09/19 03:26, , 6F
09/19 03:26, 6F
→
09/19 03:27, , 7F
09/19 03:27, 7F
推
09/19 03:31, , 8F
09/19 03:31, 8F
政府帶頭無作為(或者說帶頭歧視機車?)
偏差的觀念已經深植在某些人心中了
推
09/19 03:41, , 9F
09/19 03:41, 9F
→
09/19 03:41, , 10F
09/19 03:41, 10F
推
09/19 03:41, , 11F
09/19 03:41, 11F
→
09/19 03:42, , 12F
09/19 03:42, 12F
查無不法,洩洩指教
→
09/19 03:43, , 13F
09/19 03:43, 13F
推
09/19 06:30, , 14F
09/19 06:30, 14F
推
09/19 06:36, , 15F
09/19 06:36, 15F
※ 編輯: LieFang (36.237.200.228), 09/19/2016 07:16:33
→
09/19 08:30, , 16F
09/19 08:30, 16F
搞不好會被水桶
※ 編輯: LieFang (140.127.27.46), 09/19/2016 08:32:44
推
09/19 08:48, , 17F
09/19 08:48, 17F
→
09/19 08:58, , 18F
09/19 08:58, 18F
推
09/19 08:59, , 19F
09/19 08:59, 19F
推
09/19 09:04, , 20F
09/19 09:04, 20F
路權誠可貴,生命價更高
推
09/19 09:04, , 21F
09/19 09:04, 21F
推
09/19 09:06, , 22F
09/19 09:06, 22F
→
09/19 09:06, , 23F
09/19 09:06, 23F
慢車道是要讓到人行道嗎@@
→
09/19 09:10, , 24F
09/19 09:10, 24F
→
09/19 09:10, , 25F
09/19 09:10, 25F
政府當初沒有反對智慧型手機呀
→
09/19 09:10, , 26F
09/19 09:10, 26F
→
09/19 09:10, , 27F
09/19 09:10, 27F
→
09/19 09:21, , 28F
09/19 09:21, 28F
→
09/19 09:24, , 29F
09/19 09:24, 29F
還有 54 則推文
還有 18 段內文
ㄨㄨ 小白牌沒本事啊
※ 編輯: LieFang (36.237.195.238), 09/19/2016 15:21:56
推
09/19 16:29, , 84F
09/19 16:29, 84F
→
09/19 16:29, , 85F
09/19 16:29, 85F
→
09/19 16:29, , 86F
09/19 16:29, 86F
推
09/19 16:33, , 87F
09/19 16:33, 87F
推
09/19 16:51, , 88F
09/19 16:51, 88F
→
09/19 18:36, , 89F
09/19 18:36, 89F
→
09/19 18:38, , 90F
09/19 18:38, 90F
→
09/19 18:40, , 91F
09/19 18:40, 91F
→
09/19 19:12, , 92F
09/19 19:12, 92F
確實,安全還是最重要的
推
09/19 19:31, , 93F
09/19 19:31, 93F
→
09/19 19:31, , 94F
09/19 19:31, 94F
→
09/19 19:31, , 95F
09/19 19:31, 95F
→
09/19 19:31, , 96F
09/19 19:31, 96F
→
09/19 19:31, , 97F
09/19 19:31, 97F
→
09/19 19:31, , 98F
09/19 19:31, 98F
→
09/19 19:31, , 99F
09/19 19:31, 99F
→
09/19 19:31, , 100F
09/19 19:31, 100F
→
09/19 19:37, , 101F
09/19 19:37, 101F
→
09/19 19:37, , 102F
09/19 19:37, 102F
推
09/19 19:43, , 103F
09/19 19:43, 103F
→
09/19 19:43, , 104F
09/19 19:43, 104F
推
09/19 19:48, , 105F
09/19 19:48, 105F
→
09/19 19:49, , 106F
09/19 19:49, 106F
當然支持,但駕駛人需要教育
※ 編輯: LieFang (223.138.221.130), 09/19/2016 20:06:13
推
09/19 20:40, , 107F
09/19 20:40, 107F
→
09/19 21:09, , 108F
09/19 21:09, 108F
推
09/19 22:01, , 109F
09/19 22:01, 109F
→
09/19 22:02, , 110F
09/19 22:02, 110F
推
09/20 00:38, , 111F
09/20 00:38, 111F
推
09/20 11:00, , 112F
09/20 11:00, 112F
推
09/20 14:03, , 113F
09/20 14:03, 113F
→
09/20 14:03, , 114F
09/20 14:03, 114F
推
09/20 15:15, , 115F
09/20 15:15, 115F
→
09/20 15:31, , 116F
09/20 15:31, 116F
推
09/20 23:51, , 117F
09/20 23:51, 117F
推
09/21 00:57, , 118F
09/21 00:57, 118F
推
09/21 12:38, , 119F
09/21 12:38, 119F
→
09/22 16:22, , 120F
09/22 16:22, 120F
討論串 (同標題文章)