[請益] 為什麼現在的流行歌曲幾乎都和愛情有關?
之前就覺得的流行音樂很煩
音樂元素一成不變就算了 是有必要動不動就扯到愛情嗎?
不過之前是想說可能是我見識太少 或許是自己太敏感
但最近看了一本書叫做美國爵士樂全攻略 裡面有一段說到
「在二十世紀最初幾年,流行歌曲所涉及的主題範圍相當廣泛,以至於像是達到無所不包
的境界,例如嬰兒生日(John Mercer唱的"Mandy Is Two")、田園牧歌的冥想("Lazy
Afternoon)、.........美國南方對黑人所使用的私刑(名曲Strange Fruit)。質言之,
美式流行歌曲包含一種涉及人類情緒即存在狀況的無限可能。然而到了今天,流行歌曲
卻只注重情侶間的瑣事,無論是墜入愛河或失戀」
衝著這一段 我又去翻了一下之前買的六弦百貨店歷年精選吉他譜裡的歌詞
發現這七八年來每年被精選出來的歌曲 媽啊 還真的幾乎百分之九十九都跟愛情有關
我覺得這真的太扯了啦 e04 難道人活著除了談戀愛沒有其他重要事了嗎?
我覺得這之中一定有什麼陰謀詭計! 例如說 流行樂背後
會不會其實是是花卉業、化妝品業、婚紗業、巧克力業、汽車旅館業、保險套業、香水業
情趣用品業等等大家可以想到跟愛情有關的產業所操控的呢?
我知道我這樣想有點白癡有點被害妄想症
但這種狀況 是不是真的有可能 是某一集團為了某種不為人知的目的所製造出來的結果呢?
大家撥冗來一起討論討論好嗎? 感激~
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 59.112.168.241
※ 編輯: onedge 來自: 59.112.168.241 (03/29 02:49)
推
03/29 02:54, , 1F
03/29 02:54, 1F
→
03/29 02:55, , 2F
03/29 02:55, 2F
→
03/29 02:55, , 3F
03/29 02:55, 3F
→
03/29 02:56, , 4F
03/29 02:56, 4F
→
03/29 02:57, , 5F
03/29 02:57, 5F
→
03/29 02:58, , 6F
03/29 02:58, 6F
→
03/29 02:58, , 7F
03/29 02:58, 7F
→
03/29 03:00, , 8F
03/29 03:00, 8F
→
03/29 03:00, , 9F
03/29 03:00, 9F
→
03/29 03:00, , 10F
03/29 03:00, 10F
→
03/29 03:00, , 11F
03/29 03:00, 11F
→
03/29 03:00, , 12F
03/29 03:00, 12F
推
03/29 08:15, , 13F
03/29 08:15, 13F
→
03/29 08:53, , 14F
03/29 08:53, 14F
推
03/29 09:03, , 15F
03/29 09:03, 15F
推
03/29 10:01, , 16F
03/29 10:01, 16F
→
03/29 10:01, , 17F
03/29 10:01, 17F
推
03/29 10:16, , 18F
03/29 10:16, 18F
推
03/29 11:42, , 19F
03/29 11:42, 19F
→
03/29 12:27, , 20F
03/29 12:27, 20F
→
03/29 12:28, , 21F
03/29 12:28, 21F
→
03/29 12:28, , 22F
03/29 12:28, 22F
推
03/29 12:40, , 23F
03/29 12:40, 23F
→
03/29 12:42, , 24F
03/29 12:42, 24F
→
03/29 12:42, , 25F
03/29 12:42, 25F
推
03/29 12:48, , 26F
03/29 12:48, 26F
→
03/29 12:48, , 27F
03/29 12:48, 27F
→
03/29 13:23, , 28F
03/29 13:23, 28F
→
03/29 13:23, , 29F
03/29 13:23, 29F
推
03/29 14:30, , 30F
03/29 14:30, 30F
→
03/29 14:30, , 31F
03/29 14:30, 31F
→
03/29 14:51, , 32F
03/29 14:51, 32F
推
03/29 14:57, , 33F
03/29 14:57, 33F
→
03/29 14:57, , 34F
03/29 14:57, 34F
→
03/29 14:58, , 35F
03/29 14:58, 35F
推
03/29 16:33, , 36F
03/29 16:33, 36F
推
03/29 16:37, , 37F
03/29 16:37, 37F
推
03/29 16:58, , 38F
03/29 16:58, 38F
推
03/29 17:49, , 39F
03/29 17:49, 39F
→
03/29 17:49, , 40F
03/29 17:49, 40F
→
03/29 21:23, , 41F
03/29 21:23, 41F
→
03/29 21:23, , 42F
03/29 21:23, 42F
推
03/29 21:51, , 43F
03/29 21:51, 43F
→
03/29 23:07, , 44F
03/29 23:07, 44F
→
03/29 23:08, , 45F
03/29 23:08, 45F
推
03/30 00:26, , 46F
03/30 00:26, 46F
→
03/30 00:27, , 47F
03/30 00:27, 47F
推
03/30 00:36, , 48F
03/30 00:36, 48F
推
03/30 01:41, , 49F
03/30 01:41, 49F
→
03/30 01:41, , 50F
03/30 01:41, 50F
推
03/30 01:46, , 51F
03/30 01:46, 51F
推
03/30 01:47, , 52F
03/30 01:47, 52F
推
03/31 12:26, , 53F
03/31 12:26, 53F
→
03/31 12:26, , 54F
03/31 12:26, 54F
→
03/31 12:26, , 55F
03/31 12:26, 55F
→
03/31 12:26, , 56F
03/31 12:26, 56F
→
03/31 12:26, , 57F
03/31 12:26, 57F
推
03/31 12:29, , 58F
03/31 12:29, 58F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):