Re: [討論] 林奕含出書的目的
看板WomenTalk作者Birthday5566 (生日5566)時間7年前 (2017/05/02 01:11)推噓28(35推 7噓 63→)留言105則, 40人參與討論串8/18 (看更多)
出書的目的,我也不知,反正不知道最好。
我個人的想法很簡單:這本書最好就是不要去看啦。
如果看了這本書,還是不懂林女在想什麼就算了,
那如果懂了,知道她心理到底在想什麼了,那怎麼辦?
你愈認同她,你的思維就離她愈近,
可林女的那條路是死路,如果你走了上去,確定能走下來嗎?
現在看到有些人,都在用小說當證據來辦案了,
這些人看完書,會不會把自己代入林女更深,深到抽不出來的層度呢?
嗯,我覺得這個實驗可以不用作,這個問題可以沒有解答,
人不要在這種事情上挑戰極限比較好。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 218.164.5.220
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WomenTalk/M.1493658717.A.C62.html
推
05/02 01:17, , 1F
05/02 01:17, 1F
→
05/02 01:17, , 2F
05/02 01:17, 2F
→
05/02 01:17, , 3F
05/02 01:17, 3F
→
05/02 01:19, , 4F
05/02 01:19, 4F
→
05/02 01:19, , 5F
05/02 01:19, 5F
→
05/02 01:21, , 6F
05/02 01:21, 6F
→
05/02 01:21, , 7F
05/02 01:21, 7F
講直白點,一堆人看了電影、看了連續劇後都能哭得淅瀝嘩啦,
何況這小說,作者改編時還刻意求深加黑,是往死裡寫的。
大家看完,都可以沒事兒沒事兒,不傷肝腸不傷心?
→
05/02 01:27, , 8F
05/02 01:27, 8F
→
05/02 01:27, , 9F
05/02 01:27, 9F
推
05/02 01:31, , 10F
05/02 01:31, 10F
推
05/02 01:32, , 11F
05/02 01:32, 11F
→
05/02 01:32, , 12F
05/02 01:32, 12F
※ 編輯: Birthday5566 (218.164.5.220), 05/02/2017 01:40:48
→
05/02 01:41, , 13F
05/02 01:41, 13F
推
05/02 01:45, , 14F
05/02 01:45, 14F
→
05/02 01:45, , 15F
05/02 01:45, 15F
推
05/02 01:50, , 16F
05/02 01:50, 16F
→
05/02 01:50, , 17F
05/02 01:50, 17F
推
05/02 01:54, , 18F
05/02 01:54, 18F
推
05/02 01:56, , 19F
05/02 01:56, 19F
→
05/02 01:57, , 20F
05/02 01:57, 20F
推
05/02 02:05, , 21F
05/02 02:05, 21F
噓
05/02 02:05, , 22F
05/02 02:05, 22F
→
05/02 02:07, , 23F
05/02 02:07, 23F
推
05/02 02:08, , 24F
05/02 02:08, 24F
推
05/02 02:11, , 25F
05/02 02:11, 25F
→
05/02 02:11, , 26F
05/02 02:11, 26F
→
05/02 02:11, , 27F
05/02 02:11, 27F
→
05/02 02:12, , 28F
05/02 02:12, 28F
→
05/02 02:17, , 29F
05/02 02:17, 29F
→
05/02 02:20, , 30F
05/02 02:20, 30F
推
05/02 02:22, , 31F
05/02 02:22, 31F
→
05/02 02:22, , 32F
05/02 02:22, 32F
→
05/02 02:22, , 33F
05/02 02:22, 33F
推
05/02 02:23, , 34F
05/02 02:23, 34F
→
05/02 02:23, , 35F
05/02 02:23, 35F
→
05/02 02:28, , 36F
05/02 02:28, 36F
→
05/02 02:28, , 37F
05/02 02:28, 37F
還有 28 則推文
推
05/02 03:59, , 66F
05/02 03:59, 66F
→
05/02 03:59, , 67F
05/02 03:59, 67F
推
05/02 04:44, , 68F
05/02 04:44, 68F
→
05/02 04:44, , 69F
05/02 04:44, 69F
→
05/02 04:45, , 70F
05/02 04:45, 70F
推
05/02 05:50, , 71F
05/02 05:50, 71F
→
05/02 05:50, , 72F
05/02 05:50, 72F
→
05/02 05:50, , 73F
05/02 05:50, 73F
推
05/02 06:51, , 74F
05/02 06:51, 74F
噓
05/02 06:55, , 75F
05/02 06:55, 75F
推
05/02 07:02, , 76F
05/02 07:02, 76F
推
05/02 07:18, , 77F
05/02 07:18, 77F
→
05/02 08:03, , 78F
05/02 08:03, 78F
→
05/02 08:03, , 79F
05/02 08:03, 79F
推
05/02 08:18, , 80F
05/02 08:18, 80F
→
05/02 08:33, , 81F
05/02 08:33, 81F
推
05/02 09:00, , 82F
05/02 09:00, 82F
噓
05/02 09:04, , 83F
05/02 09:04, 83F
→
05/02 09:04, , 84F
05/02 09:04, 84F
推
05/02 09:11, , 85F
05/02 09:11, 85F
→
05/02 09:12, , 86F
05/02 09:12, 86F
推
05/02 09:34, , 87F
05/02 09:34, 87F
→
05/02 09:35, , 88F
05/02 09:35, 88F
→
05/02 09:36, , 89F
05/02 09:36, 89F
→
05/02 09:36, , 90F
05/02 09:36, 90F
推
05/02 10:41, , 91F
05/02 10:41, 91F
→
05/02 10:41, , 92F
05/02 10:41, 92F
推
05/02 10:47, , 93F
05/02 10:47, 93F
→
05/02 10:47, , 94F
05/02 10:47, 94F
噓
05/02 11:00, , 95F
05/02 11:00, 95F
推
05/02 11:28, , 96F
05/02 11:28, 96F
噓
05/02 11:51, , 97F
05/02 11:51, 97F
推
05/02 12:41, , 98F
05/02 12:41, 98F
推
05/02 13:37, , 99F
05/02 13:37, 99F
噓
05/02 14:34, , 100F
05/02 14:34, 100F
→
05/02 14:35, , 101F
05/02 14:35, 101F
噓
05/02 17:42, , 102F
05/02 17:42, 102F
推
05/02 19:02, , 103F
05/02 19:02, 103F
推
05/02 19:02, , 104F
05/02 19:02, 104F
→
06/04 16:19, , 105F
06/04 16:19, 105F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
討論
11
23
完整討論串 (本文為第 8 之 18 篇):
討論
79
318
討論
29
80
討論
179
325
討論
19
47
討論
6
24
討論
28
105
討論
8
27