[討論] 有人覺得台大一年160億太多嗎?已回收
某堂課的老師說外面的人聽到台大一直哭窮都很不爽,因為已經拿了全台最多的錢了(新
聞的來源說是160億),
但是他說其實跟國外一流(公立)的大學來比,其實輸了一大截,根本無法比,甚至台大一
年的預算擠不進大陸高教預算排行榜的前40名,這樣是如何躋身國際,並且提高競爭力呢
?
沒有足夠的預算就無法吸引好的教授來台教書,也不能購買好的設備,台灣最聰明的學生
因而無法受到最好的教育
-----------以上為老師的言論XDD----------
大家覺得政府是不是應該提高預算呢?還是應該降低,應該要平均分配,反正在台大讀書
其實是要培養人脈,老師設備不那麼重要,而且反正之後也都會去國外念碩博,教育讓國
外的大學幫我們國家就好呢?
新聞數字參考這裡:http://udn.com/news/story/9/1740643
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.83.241.38
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WomenTalk/M.1481373883.A.CFD.html
※ 編輯: llueveahora7 (111.83.241.38), 12/10/2016 20:46:30
→
12/10 20:46, , 1F
12/10 20:46, 1F
→
12/10 20:46, , 2F
12/10 20:46, 2F
推
12/10 20:48, , 3F
12/10 20:48, 3F
推
12/10 20:49, , 4F
12/10 20:49, 4F
→
12/10 20:49, , 5F
12/10 20:49, 5F
→
12/10 20:49, , 6F
12/10 20:49, 6F
→
12/10 20:49, , 7F
12/10 20:49, 7F
推
12/10 20:51, , 8F
12/10 20:51, 8F
推
12/10 20:55, , 9F
12/10 20:55, 9F
推
12/10 20:59, , 10F
12/10 20:59, 10F
推
12/10 21:02, , 11F
12/10 21:02, 11F
推
12/10 21:05, , 12F
12/10 21:05, 12F
→
12/10 21:08, , 13F
12/10 21:08, 13F
→
12/10 21:08, , 14F
12/10 21:08, 14F
推
12/10 21:09, , 15F
12/10 21:09, 15F
推
12/10 21:09, , 16F
12/10 21:09, 16F
→
12/10 21:09, , 17F
12/10 21:09, 17F
→
12/10 21:10, , 18F
12/10 21:10, 18F
推
12/10 21:10, , 19F
12/10 21:10, 19F
→
12/10 21:10, , 20F
12/10 21:10, 20F
噓
12/10 21:10, , 21F
12/10 21:10, 21F
推
12/10 21:11, , 22F
12/10 21:11, 22F
推
12/10 21:11, , 23F
12/10 21:11, 23F
→
12/10 21:11, , 24F
12/10 21:11, 24F
→
12/10 21:11, , 25F
12/10 21:11, 25F
噓
12/10 21:12, , 26F
12/10 21:12, 26F
→
12/10 21:12, , 27F
12/10 21:12, 27F
噓
12/10 21:12, , 28F
12/10 21:12, 28F
→
12/10 21:12, , 29F
12/10 21:12, 29F
→
12/10 21:12, , 30F
12/10 21:12, 30F
推
12/10 21:13, , 31F
12/10 21:13, 31F
→
12/10 21:13, , 32F
12/10 21:13, 32F
推
12/10 21:13, , 33F
12/10 21:13, 33F
→
12/10 21:14, , 34F
12/10 21:14, 34F
→
12/10 21:14, , 35F
12/10 21:14, 35F
推
12/10 21:18, , 36F
12/10 21:18, 36F
→
12/10 21:19, , 37F
12/10 21:19, 37F
→
12/10 21:19, , 38F
12/10 21:19, 38F
→
12/10 21:19, , 39F
12/10 21:19, 39F
還有 104 則推文
還有 1 段內文
→
12/11 00:34, , 144F
12/11 00:34, 144F
噓
12/11 00:40, , 145F
12/11 00:40, 145F
推
12/11 01:05, , 146F
12/11 01:05, 146F
→
12/11 01:05, , 147F
12/11 01:05, 147F
→
12/11 01:07, , 148F
12/11 01:07, 148F
推
12/11 01:28, , 149F
12/11 01:28, 149F
→
12/11 01:28, , 150F
12/11 01:28, 150F
推
12/11 01:34, , 151F
12/11 01:34, 151F
推
12/11 01:59, , 152F
12/11 01:59, 152F
推
12/11 02:15, , 153F
12/11 02:15, 153F
噓
12/11 02:42, , 154F
12/11 02:42, 154F
推
12/11 04:19, , 155F
12/11 04:19, 155F
→
12/11 04:19, , 156F
12/11 04:19, 156F
推
12/11 04:25, , 157F
12/11 04:25, 157F
推
12/11 04:49, , 158F
12/11 04:49, 158F
→
12/11 06:25, , 159F
12/11 06:25, 159F
噓
12/11 07:09, , 160F
12/11 07:09, 160F
→
12/11 08:08, , 161F
12/11 08:08, 161F
→
12/11 08:08, , 162F
12/11 08:08, 162F
推
12/11 08:40, , 163F
12/11 08:40, 163F
推
12/11 08:53, , 164F
12/11 08:53, 164F
推
12/11 09:21, , 165F
12/11 09:21, 165F
推
12/11 09:53, , 166F
12/11 09:53, 166F
推
12/11 10:20, , 167F
12/11 10:20, 167F
→
12/11 10:20, , 168F
12/11 10:20, 168F
→
12/11 10:20, , 169F
12/11 10:20, 169F
噓
12/11 12:38, , 170F
12/11 12:38, 170F
→
12/11 12:38, , 171F
12/11 12:38, 171F
→
12/11 12:38, , 172F
12/11 12:38, 172F
推
12/11 12:52, , 173F
12/11 12:52, 173F
推
12/11 12:59, , 174F
12/11 12:59, 174F
→
12/11 13:10, , 175F
12/11 13:10, 175F
推
12/11 13:32, , 176F
12/11 13:32, 176F
→
12/11 13:32, , 177F
12/11 13:32, 177F
推
12/11 15:55, , 178F
12/11 15:55, 178F
噓
12/11 17:18, , 179F
12/11 17:18, 179F
噓
12/11 17:56, , 180F
12/11 17:56, 180F
推
12/11 18:16, , 181F
12/11 18:16, 181F
→
12/11 21:35, , 182F
12/11 21:35, 182F
噓
12/17 12:00, , 183F
12/17 12:00, 183F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):