[討論] 為何文組女生多?理組女生少?已回收
這件事情困惑我很久......
前面有人提到薪資不平等的問題
我就會想問 是在怎樣的基礎下去談論薪資?
是在全體男女性直接算平均?問題是這樣算的話 會牽涉到男女的就業結構似乎不一樣
男女就業結構不一樣 直覺就會想到竹科都是(或者很多)男工程師之類的
這種理工科 男女性分布不均等的問題似乎不是到就業才發生 而是從學生時期就出現了
首先 大家先忘記那些男生數學比較好之類的話 去年都有女生得數學諾貝爾獎了
理工科薪資似乎比文組高 這也似乎是很多男生會選擇理工科(醫科)而非文科的原因
我不是女生也沒念過女校 但也有有聽說過女校 文組似乎也比理組的人還多
所以這不應該是能力問題 因為女校裡文理組是女生跟女生比較
在明知社會薪資結構理工高過文組之下 女生為什麼偏好文組勝過理組 ?
--
希望不要出現女生就是怎樣 男生就是怎樣的...論述orz
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 220.136.63.249
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WomenTalk/M.1459143623.A.EE5.html
推
03/28 13:42, , 1F
03/28 13:42, 1F
推
03/28 13:42, , 2F
03/28 13:42, 2F
推
03/28 13:42, , 3F
03/28 13:42, 3F
我以前雄中 理組15個班 文組2個班xD
推
03/28 13:43, , 4F
03/28 13:43, 4F
→
03/28 13:43, , 5F
03/28 13:43, 5F
推
03/28 13:43, , 6F
03/28 13:43, 6F
→
03/28 13:43, , 7F
03/28 13:43, 7F
推
03/28 13:43, , 8F
03/28 13:43, 8F
這觀念倒底怎麼出現的xd
推
03/28 13:43, , 9F
03/28 13:43, 9F
推
03/28 13:43, , 10F
03/28 13:43, 10F
推
03/28 13:43, , 11F
03/28 13:43, 11F
※ 編輯: hayuyang (220.136.63.249), 03/28/2016 13:44:56
推
03/28 13:44, , 12F
03/28 13:44, 12F
推
03/28 13:44, , 13F
03/28 13:44, 13F
→
03/28 13:44, , 14F
03/28 13:44, 14F
推
03/28 13:45, , 15F
03/28 13:45, 15F
推
03/28 13:45, , 16F
03/28 13:45, 16F
推
03/28 13:45, , 17F
03/28 13:45, 17F
→
03/28 13:45, , 18F
03/28 13:45, 18F
→
03/28 13:45, , 19F
03/28 13:45, 19F
→
03/28 13:45, , 20F
03/28 13:45, 20F
假如是社會結構 產業結構影響的話 這種狀況理應是台灣特有
但這件事情似乎在各國都有某種程度的現象出現
→
03/28 13:46, , 21F
03/28 13:46, 21F
→
03/28 13:47, , 22F
03/28 13:47, 22F
推
03/28 13:47, , 23F
03/28 13:47, 23F
→
03/28 13:47, , 24F
03/28 13:47, 24F
→
03/28 13:47, , 25F
03/28 13:47, 25F
推
03/28 13:48, , 26F
03/28 13:48, 26F
→
03/28 13:48, , 27F
03/28 13:48, 27F
推
03/28 13:48, , 28F
03/28 13:48, 28F
推
03/28 13:48, , 29F
03/28 13:48, 29F
→
03/28 13:49, , 30F
03/28 13:49, 30F
推
03/28 13:49, , 31F
03/28 13:49, 31F
→
03/28 13:49, , 32F
03/28 13:49, 32F
推
03/28 13:50, , 33F
03/28 13:50, 33F
→
03/28 13:50, , 34F
03/28 13:50, 34F
這種滿有可能 從各種感情兩性專家議題來看 男生女生處理生活問題的方式似乎不一樣
男生傾向尋求邏輯解決問題 女生似乎尋求感情上的解決?
還有 141 則推文
還有 7 段內文
→
03/28 18:18, , 176F
03/28 18:18, 176F
推
03/28 18:48, , 177F
03/28 18:48, 177F
→
03/28 18:48, , 178F
03/28 18:48, 178F
→
03/28 18:48, , 179F
03/28 18:48, 179F
推
03/28 19:03, , 180F
03/28 19:03, 180F
推
03/28 19:09, , 181F
03/28 19:09, 181F
→
03/28 19:09, , 182F
03/28 19:09, 182F
→
03/28 19:10, , 183F
03/28 19:10, 183F
推
03/28 19:26, , 184F
03/28 19:26, 184F
推
03/28 19:37, , 185F
03/28 19:37, 185F
→
03/28 19:37, , 186F
03/28 19:37, 186F
→
03/28 19:38, , 187F
03/28 19:38, 187F
推
03/28 19:41, , 188F
03/28 19:41, 188F
推
03/28 19:45, , 189F
03/28 19:45, 189F
→
03/28 19:45, , 190F
03/28 19:45, 190F
推
03/28 19:54, , 191F
03/28 19:54, 191F
推
03/28 20:05, , 192F
03/28 20:05, 192F
→
03/28 20:16, , 193F
03/28 20:16, 193F
推
03/28 20:30, , 194F
03/28 20:30, 194F
→
03/28 20:30, , 195F
03/28 20:30, 195F
→
03/28 23:33, , 196F
03/28 23:33, 196F
→
03/28 23:33, , 197F
03/28 23:33, 197F
推
03/28 23:40, , 198F
03/28 23:40, 198F
→
03/28 23:40, , 199F
03/28 23:40, 199F
推
03/29 01:01, , 200F
03/29 01:01, 200F
→
03/29 01:01, , 201F
03/29 01:01, 201F
→
03/29 01:01, , 202F
03/29 01:01, 202F
→
03/29 02:08, , 203F
03/29 02:08, 203F
→
03/29 02:08, , 204F
03/29 02:08, 204F
→
03/29 02:08, , 205F
03/29 02:08, 205F
→
03/29 02:08, , 206F
03/29 02:08, 206F
→
03/29 02:08, , 207F
03/29 02:08, 207F
→
03/29 02:08, , 208F
03/29 02:08, 208F
→
03/29 02:37, , 209F
03/29 02:37, 209F
推
03/29 03:16, , 210F
03/29 03:16, 210F
→
03/29 13:55, , 211F
03/29 13:55, 211F
→
03/29 13:55, , 212F
03/29 13:55, 212F
推
03/29 21:18, , 213F
03/29 21:18, 213F
→
03/29 21:18, , 214F
03/29 21:18, 214F
推
03/30 02:59, , 215F
03/30 02:59, 215F
討論串 (同標題文章)