Re: [心得] 課本上沒教的歷史(8)：誠實數據說228

看板Warfare作者srx00000 (五零)時間8年前 (2016/03/07 08:53)推噓6(6推 0噓 113→)

留言119則, 21人參與討論串4/4 (看更多)

228基金會所引用之葛氏言論，原文中應該是如此的：「When the Japanese Property Registration Commission completed its work, qualified staff economists estimated the total value of nonmilitary property made ready for transfer at two billion dollars at prewar rates of exchange. If we halve this sum (to mitigate the charge that the Japanese must be expected to exaggerate their losses), we are still confronted with a billion-dollar figure. Under circumstances then affecting values at Shanghai and Taipei it was impossible to put a realistic valuation on Formosa as a whole, and upon the confiscated properties. Here was in effect an enormous reparations transfer of four or five billion dollars' worth of properties (excluding arms and ammunition), by Japan to China. Under proper management Formosa's modern economy could have been made to generate great surpluses needed in the rehabilitation program for China proper , and the island could have become an invaluable training ground for tens of thousands of Chinese technicians needed in every mainland Chinese province.」 --FORMOSA BETRAYED　George H. Kerr 第122~123頁跟中文版有一些出入，不過原文貼在這給你看了。至於文中所述20億美元資產也其來有自根據戰後日本處理賠償問題時外務省所做的調查，至1945年8月5日時海外資產如下：朝鮮 702億5600万円台湾 425億4200万円東北 1465億3200万円中国華北 554億3700万円華中・華南 367億1800万円その他の地域（樺太、南洋、その他南方地域、欧米諸国等）其他地區(庫頁島，南太平洋，其他南方區域，歐美諸國等) 280億1400万円合計 3794億9900万円出自：国会図書館外交防衛課『調査と情報第228号戦後補償問題ー総論（1）』第7頁 1945年時1美元=15日圓，故可簡單得出台灣資產換算美元後為： 28億3613萬美元說30億是胡謅的，是否有些欠缺公允？至於葛氏的經歷嘛， 1937-1940 English teacher, Taipei, Taiwan 1942-1943 Analyst and consultant on Formosa, U.S. Department of War 1944-1946 Director, Formosa Research Unit, Naval School of Military 　　　　　　　　Government and Administration, U.S. Navy, Columbia University, 　　　　　　　　New York 1946-1947 Foreign service staff officer and vice consul, U.S. 　　　　　　　　Department of State, Taipei, Taiwan 1947-1949 Lecturer, University of Washington 1949-1950 Lecturer, Stanford University and University of California at 　　　　　　　　Berkeley 1950-1955　 Research Associate, Hoover Institution 比較起一個"駐台不到一年期間、也未受專業財報或軍事訓練的外交官"提出的言論，僅僅一個"普通大學畢業生"的言論有多可信，我也是存疑的。不才在下要補充的僅以上而已，若有錯誤之處，還望各位先進大德不吝指正賜教。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.116.166.72 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Warfare/M.1457311984.A.F01.html

→

tokyopig579

03/07 09:07, , 1^F

03/07 09:07, 1^F

→

g3sg1

03/07 09:57, , 2^F

03/07 09:57, 2^F

→

Swallow43

03/07 10:25, , 3^F

03/07 10:25, 3^F